5851
Comments (577)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
TalmudIsToiletPaper -1 points ago +1 / -2

If you note the precise differences in hair analysis, and facial structure you should arrive at a different conclusion. And they do not have the same body types at all. The lanyard is GA Government Issue, it's not hers uniquely.

1
labiator 1 point ago +3 / -2

you are trained co-intel, we know

2
BeefCastle69 2 points ago +3 / -1

This dude is the second shill I've found on this thread trying desperately to deboonk this. They're relentless, always claiming to a higher authority as if we shouldn't believe OWN FUCKING EYES

0
milonie 0 points ago +1 / -1

Then i must be the second. Ever noticed that for europeans asians all look the same? thats because they differentiate faces differently. But if you lived long enough in a region you would have no problem distinguishing smeone from ghana from nigeria, japan from china, philipins from thai. In this picture we only have eye region and forehead for distinguishing. Someone that draws for 10 years or someone that does 3d modeling will immediately see cm or mm differences. you only need a few cm difference at the jawline and smaller face to cranium ratio to make a male face female. https://www.spektrum.de/news/mal-frau-mal-mann/1055542 https://www.spektrum.de/news/wie-berechnet-man-schoenheit/793179 the problem with the frontal pictures of ballot woman is that you do not see the difference in angle of the forehead. When i model 3d portraits in maya i need at least 3 (better 7) different angles to get it right. the strongest difference is the the left pic has way deeper eysockets and hence that caveman look. Also look at the angle the forehead goes down. and at the superciliary arch. ballot counter has a much more prodruding face, probably due to a stronger jawline ( superciliary arch groes in relation to jaw, evolutionary it is meant to buffer the forces that result from a bite). look at the forehead shape at the hairline. the overall flatter face of ballot counter. the steep angle Parent's forehead has compared to ballot counter. anyone who draws portraits would immediately see that.

-3
TalmudIsToiletPaper -3 points ago +1 / -4

Actually trying to stop you from getting Psyop Played, but whatever. Check my post history.

0
BeefCastle69 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not the same body type? Bro her boobs are at the exact same level. And considering shes wearing some puffy suit jacket thing at the hearing I would say the physiques are damn close. couple that with all the dozen other similarities and the bizarre behavior during the hearing and we have a winner. It's almost as if you don't want it to be her...Elena? is that you?

0
TalmudIsToiletPaper 0 points ago +2 / -2

As stated, beyond extensive course work on how to create positive identification of a subject or suspect, you might want to consider if it was you in surveillance footage who was being misidentified. As I seem to be the only trained observer commenting, with the background to do so, you might want to recognize that it takes many years of training and experience to make the comments I did.

What's your background in trained observation exactly?

It's not for her, or her good. It's for people here who need a lesson in trained observation and facial recognition. Imagine if US Marshals were as incompetent as most of you when they were on a manhunt. They would miss all the time, and nail the wrong people regularly. And yet they have an excellent track record of recovering the fugitives they seek. Almost like they have extensive Course Work and testing, along with years of required Field Experience in noting the differences between subtle aspects of human appearance. Food for thought.

-1
BeefCastle69 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Oh ok so we should just ignore the other numerous coincidences because you think she can't put fat on her arms because you're fully aware of her genetic profile and phenotype. Yep don't believe you're lying eyes civilian just trust the government employees that are required to have IQs in the double digits

2
TalmudIsToiletPaper 2 points ago +3 / -1

I'm not a Government Employee anymore. Haven't been for a long time. But I didn't sleep through Academy Course Work, or fail to use those skills in the field for many years.

It's your choice to be indiscriminate, and go with the mob. And I'm an Oath Keeper, so there are no days off. You're pegging an innocent election worker as being someone who has serious integrity issues, with potential Criminal Ramifications. They're simply not the same person.

Like the "Bin Laden" videos over the years containing some 5 different men. Trained Observers know it, but most of you don't. You just see a bearded Middle Eastern guy who looks very roughly the same. Imagine how trained you have to be in recognition when you're hunting someone specific, like Bin Laden. Same applies here. Good Luck!