Source on this? The SCOWI responded positively to our request, but made it go through lower courts first. The fact that it was split for that move shows that they'll likely rule favorably.
It wasn't split though, it was 3 out of 7 who wrote favorably. That won't get it done. I WANT Wisconsin to flip, but I just don't have a ton of faith that the courts will act quickly enough for it to matter.
There are only 7 Justices on the Wisconsin SC. It has a 4-3 "Conservative" lead in it technically but Trump's lawsuit was rejected 4-3, so one of the conservative Justices went with the liberals.
Source on this? The SCOWI responded positively to our request, but made it go through lower courts first. The fact that it was split for that move shows that they'll likely rule favorably.
It wasn't split though, it was 3 out of 7 who wrote favorably. That won't get it done. I WANT Wisconsin to flip, but I just don't have a ton of faith that the courts will act quickly enough for it to matter.
It was 4-5, no? At least on the important one?
There are only 7 Justices on the Wisconsin SC. It has a 4-3 "Conservative" lead in it technically but Trump's lawsuit was rejected 4-3, so one of the conservative Justices went with the liberals.
That's not a rejection—they said to go through the lower courts first. The fact that it was split on that action is a positive signal for us.