133
Comments (8)
sorted by:
5
Ruck_Feddit69 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm watching Starcraft footage to better understand how Democrats committed their latest crime against our country.

This timeline is nuts.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0 (edited)
4
MikeObamasVeineyCock 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not sure starcraft is the best simulation engine. I watched his longer videos which are way more convincing. Where he bumblefucks through excel. Dude needs an actual engineer to help him. A commercial engineer used to dealing with non academics.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)
1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

i still dont understand it lol

2
Loiuzein 2 points ago +2 / -0

I shall attempt a translation.

At any given point in time, Dominion has assumed direct control of the voting data of some number of precincts.

These "seized" precincts are generating votes in predetermined ratios - i.e., one will generate 2 Biden votes per Trump vote; another generates 10 Biden per Trump; another generates 1 Biden per 2 Trump, etc.

All other precincts are generating natural votes (whatever gets scanned in).

Every so often, the system chooses to release all "seized" precincts, and seize different precincts instead. This helps to hide that there was vote flipping, by keeping the number of flipped votes in any given precinct to a minimum.

The system has pre-calculated the number of votes that need to be generated by each of its ratios (e.g., the 10:1 ratio might need to process 2000 votes, while the 1:2 ratio needs to process 200). Once a ratio's quota is fulfilled, the system stops seizing precincts for that ratio.

My assumptions follow: the number of votes that a ratio needs to generate is determined based on projected voter turnout, and may update over time. Trump's landslide victory resulted in so many more Trump votes than expected that the system's initial calculations were too far off to steal the election. That's why the counting lasted so unacceptably long after the election.

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

But how would you prove that is the algorithm without all the conditions of election night?

1
Loiuzein 1 point ago +1 / -0

The guy who did the video has two other videos where he's using the direct results from election night, this one is just a visual aid to try to help with understanding. He shows the ratios moving from precinct to precinct in a manner wholly consistent with this theory.

I imagine it's unprovable other than by calculating the probability that this regular series of numbers would occur naturally, which is probably less likely than 138,000 votes in a row for one candidate. But I honestly dunno 🤡🌎 anything could happen