44
Comments (19)
sorted by:
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
4
Gyromancer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am not talking about whether any orders have been given, but rather whether this is a real law or not.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was a long thread, but this particular snapshot talks about a law in the books and not specific to any instance. I just wanted to know the validity of such a law.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you are saying there is no such thing as Prometheus (or whatever it is called) that pins down the chain of command in case of problematic succession ?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, did you even read the title of my post? If you cannot confirm the validity of this, it does not automatically make this a larp

1
beholdachair 1 point ago +2 / -1

post the link

1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry buddy, lost it. There was a lot of usual stuff, nothing new, only this part looked interesting

1
scarfacexxx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Im also trying to find something about this

1
1Vigilantbastard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait didn’t krebbs say something in his tweet about us not knowing anything about promethius He said something shitty about us not knowing anything about kraken and then said something about promethius

1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Recent tweet or a while ago ?

1
1Vigilantbastard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right after he was fired.