That "documentary" seemed more like propaganda to paint a different story but not necessarily the truth.
In any case, there are some points about Hitler and WWII that most people need to reevaluate.
Did the west need to declare war on Hitler? Who was the west defending? What were the reasons for the west to go to war with Hitler? Why did the USA enter the war? What was there to gain?
What role did international finance and banking have in the war?
Was killing the Jews ever actually the plan until Hitler's supply lines were low due to the war. Was killing the Jews simply a last resort? Should the west take more blame for not taking in Jews when Hitler tried to extradite them instead of put them in internment camps?
The Jews were predominantly in the job fields that were having a negative impact on society, even today in the USA with only 2% of the population, Jewish people dominate the professions that are having a substantially negative impact on society such as areas surrounding critical race theory, social media, traditional media, Hollywood and academia. Why is this? Was Hitler justified in his actions against the Jews?
Was the USSR and communism a bigger threat? Would Germany's fascism actually have been a better country in Europe than what we had following WWII and even today?
Regardless of all of this, Hitler did lose, so he ultimately failed and in some regards his efforts has put society back considerably because due to his failure, the powers at play utilized the war to indoctrinate everyone in society toward their egalitarian and new world order ideologies, which we're now experiencing having a significant negative impact on society, much the same way Germany had experienced negative impacts in the Weimar Republic. If you read the book "Germany and the Jewish Question" written by Dr. Friederich Karl Wiehe in 1938, he describes the Jewish people in Germany as being responsible for XYZ. Now, replace Jew with Liberal in today's dialogue and you essentially get the EXACT same thing. I could rewrite the whole book, change Jew to liberal, publish it in the USA and all conservatives would agree with me. That to me is worth discussion, especially since when you look at the key people behind much of the problems the book speaks of that mimic the issues of liberals, the Jews do seem to dominate the areas. No one likes making things about race these days but why is that? BLM makes it about race. Critical race theory makes it about race. Everyone is making everything about race already...
Anyway, fascism isn't the way. It essentially was socialism and amounted totalitarianism which is not much different than communism. National capitalism with christian morality is the way tor run a country. We also need to remove ourselves from the international community and the international banking system which needs to be national in nature not international.
Dude I literally agree with everything you said. But as an American we are fed this ww2 mythology that is a paradigm shift for an average yank like me, no change the term Jew, and liberal for follower of satan...
Communism is satanic, change my mind
One more point, can we have a true free market capitalist system with the internationalist tick imbedded into the “market”. They already control the money.
Hitler expelled the central banks and created currency that was based on labor which is why his country went from debt ridden to a world power in 3 years. This fake financial system they have us toiling in is the real bullshit. They have enslaved us to debt.
No, we cannot have true free market because that is how the international community has taken advantage of the system. We need national capitalism. A market as free as possible but with controls set to benefit the country first.
I work in banking and am highly knowledgeable in how banking works. I have a number of post graduate certifications that are too hard for most people to pass... Whenever people discuss banking/finance as evil they can never explain why. Saying "money backed by labor instead of air", is actually a meaningless statement in regards to modern finance/banking. Explain how one benefits the other and most people cannot. It sounds good but it doesn't mean anything.
The reason Hitler was able to increase the wealth substantially is because he stopped paying the interest on his country's loans.
Our society would be immeasurably worse without usury. In any system designed to replace an interest based system, it always has implied interest built into user-fees or simply larger principals to be repaid.
The quick summary of why banking is bad that no one seems able to articulate properly: Banking matches savers with borrowers. When you have an international banking system what effectively happens is that money saved in country A matches with borrowers in country B. This isn't good for country A because it isn't seeing the gains from their savers be applied to their own country. The academic rationale for why it's good is because the profits from the bank lending to country B will come back to country A and it'll be a net gain for country A but this isn't the case in actual practice.
Also I agree the documentary tried to make Hitler look like a catholic which I don’t believe he was, but that was literally the only part of the documentary that I didn’t believe.
It amazes me people can be awake, today, see all the shit we're being lied to about by the big powers, and not stop and think that maybe the whole narrative on WWII is just as much a load of crap, told by winners to justify the awful things they did during the war.
Why is one group of people so sacred you can never question anything about them without being automatically declared some kind of racist for it?
This is a provocative content. No questions are asked, and it seeks confirmation that other people do not despise hitler here. They do.
Apart from that, You guys in uS are fed a lot of crap regarding the history and WW2 mostly because - in general - people are ignorant on the subject and do not educate themselves. Europe had many countries, local language and effect is all materials available are based on same previous info, there is no push for reaching out and dig further.
That "documentary" seemed more like propaganda to paint a different story but not necessarily the truth.
In any case, there are some points about Hitler and WWII that most people need to reevaluate.
Did the west need to declare war on Hitler? Who was the west defending? What were the reasons for the west to go to war with Hitler? Why did the USA enter the war? What was there to gain?
What role did international finance and banking have in the war?
Was killing the Jews ever actually the plan until Hitler's supply lines were low due to the war. Was killing the Jews simply a last resort? Should the west take more blame for not taking in Jews when Hitler tried to extradite them instead of put them in internment camps?
The Jews were predominantly in the job fields that were having a negative impact on society, even today in the USA with only 2% of the population, Jewish people dominate the professions that are having a substantially negative impact on society such as areas surrounding critical race theory, social media, traditional media, Hollywood and academia. Why is this? Was Hitler justified in his actions against the Jews?
Was the USSR and communism a bigger threat? Would Germany's fascism actually have been a better country in Europe than what we had following WWII and even today?
Regardless of all of this, Hitler did lose, so he ultimately failed and in some regards his efforts has put society back considerably because due to his failure, the powers at play utilized the war to indoctrinate everyone in society toward their egalitarian and new world order ideologies, which we're now experiencing having a significant negative impact on society, much the same way Germany had experienced negative impacts in the Weimar Republic. If you read the book "Germany and the Jewish Question" written by Dr. Friederich Karl Wiehe in 1938, he describes the Jewish people in Germany as being responsible for XYZ. Now, replace Jew with Liberal in today's dialogue and you essentially get the EXACT same thing. I could rewrite the whole book, change Jew to liberal, publish it in the USA and all conservatives would agree with me. That to me is worth discussion, especially since when you look at the key people behind much of the problems the book speaks of that mimic the issues of liberals, the Jews do seem to dominate the areas. No one likes making things about race these days but why is that? BLM makes it about race. Critical race theory makes it about race. Everyone is making everything about race already...
Anyway, fascism isn't the way. It essentially was socialism and amounted totalitarianism which is not much different than communism. National capitalism with christian morality is the way tor run a country. We also need to remove ourselves from the international community and the international banking system which needs to be national in nature not international.
Dude I literally agree with everything you said. But as an American we are fed this ww2 mythology that is a paradigm shift for an average yank like me, no change the term Jew, and liberal for follower of satan...
Communism is satanic, change my mind
One more point, can we have a true free market capitalist system with the internationalist tick imbedded into the “market”. They already control the money.
Hitler expelled the central banks and created currency that was based on labor which is why his country went from debt ridden to a world power in 3 years. This fake financial system they have us toiling in is the real bullshit. They have enslaved us to debt.
No, we cannot have true free market because that is how the international community has taken advantage of the system. We need national capitalism. A market as free as possible but with controls set to benefit the country first.
I work in banking and am highly knowledgeable in how banking works. I have a number of post graduate certifications that are too hard for most people to pass... Whenever people discuss banking/finance as evil they can never explain why. Saying "money backed by labor instead of air", is actually a meaningless statement in regards to modern finance/banking. Explain how one benefits the other and most people cannot. It sounds good but it doesn't mean anything.
The reason Hitler was able to increase the wealth substantially is because he stopped paying the interest on his country's loans.
Ok So I’m not a banker. But I am a Deus Vult Catholic who believes usury is evil, period
Our society would be immeasurably worse without usury. In any system designed to replace an interest based system, it always has implied interest built into user-fees or simply larger principals to be repaid.
The quick summary of why banking is bad that no one seems able to articulate properly: Banking matches savers with borrowers. When you have an international banking system what effectively happens is that money saved in country A matches with borrowers in country B. This isn't good for country A because it isn't seeing the gains from their savers be applied to their own country. The academic rationale for why it's good is because the profits from the bank lending to country B will come back to country A and it'll be a net gain for country A but this isn't the case in actual practice.
True Free Market capitalism. Is that really what you want?
Here's a list of reasons regarding the benefits of regulation
Also I agree the documentary tried to make Hitler look like a catholic which I don’t believe he was, but that was literally the only part of the documentary that I didn’t believe.
It amazes me people can be awake, today, see all the shit we're being lied to about by the big powers, and not stop and think that maybe the whole narrative on WWII is just as much a load of crap, told by winners to justify the awful things they did during the war.
Why is one group of people so sacred you can never question anything about them without being automatically declared some kind of racist for it?
It wasn’t as much as being red pilled on Hitler but on how much propaganda we were fed regarding the events leading up to ww2
This is a provocative content. No questions are asked, and it seeks confirmation that other people do not despise hitler here. They do. Apart from that, You guys in uS are fed a lot of crap regarding the history and WW2 mostly because - in general - people are ignorant on the subject and do not educate themselves. Europe had many countries, local language and effect is all materials available are based on same previous info, there is no push for reaching out and dig further.
4chan is where you want to be, glowie.
That was the paradigm shift,