From what I understood from the last video, when Biden needed more votes, the Dominion software would target a random precinct and add votes for Biden at a 10:1 ratio (10 votes for Biden, 1 vote for Trump) for a short period of time.
Then the Dominion software would switch to a different precinct, and add fraudulent votes at the same ratio (10:1) in that new precinct, to prevent being detected.
The ratio of the fraudulent votes coming in could be changed at any time (to a 11:1 ratio, 9:1 ratio, 8:1 ratio, etc) to increase or decrease the amount of rigging, and to avoid being detected.
I believe the RIGGED VOTES were coming in like this:
Start rigging the vote at Precinct A
8:00 PM - Precinct A - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:01 PM - Precinct A - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:02 PM - Precinct A - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:03 PM - Precinct A - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:04 PM - Precinct A - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
Change to different precinct to avoid being suspicious
8:05 PM - Precinct B - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:06 PM - Precinct B - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:07 PM - Precinct B - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:08 PM - Precinct B - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
Change to different precinct to avoid being suspicious
8:09 PM - Precinct C - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:10 PM - Precinct C - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:11 PM - Precinct C - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:12 PM - Precinct C - Ratio 10:1 - Add 100 for Biden, 10 for Trump
Change to different precinct to avoid being suspicious, also change ratio
8:13 PM - Precinct D - Ratio 9:1 - Add 90 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:14 PM - Precinct D - Ratio 9:1 - Add 90 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:15 PM - Precinct D - Ratio 9:1 - Add 90 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:16 PM - Precinct D - Ratio 9:1 - Add 90 for Biden, 10 for Trump
Change to different precinct to avoid being suspicious
8:17 PM - Precinct E - Ratio 9:1 - Add 90 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:18 PM - Precinct E - Ratio 9:1 - Add 90 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:19 PM - Precinct E - Ratio 9:1 - Add 90 for Biden, 10 for Trump
8:20 PM - Precinct E - Ratio 9:1 - Add 90 for Biden, 10 for Trump
This is a huge oversimplification and I think misses the point and the elegance of his idea somewhat.
From what I understood of his video, the democrats would have to have known what the real polling data was suggesting would happen in a natural election. Let's say it was 52:48 for Trump. They wanted to make sure to rig the election to make sure they actually got a 55:45 Biden win (for instance) since this is a safe margin of victory that's not too outrageous but large enough that it defies credulity to challenge it.
Let's say that they expected 1 million voters in the county they're looking at. They would leave about 70% of those votes untouched in their natural state to make things look natural. Then for the remaining 30%, they would simply substitute the real voting results with fake ones to make up the margin that they need to win by the desired amount. In my example, the 70% of votes that are untouched would be 364K T, 336K B. To win with a ratio of 55-45 with 1 million total votes, the remaining 300K votes would have to have NO MORE than 86K votes for Trump or 28% of the votes. The remaining 72% were would mostly be given to Biden, but some of them (calculated by a bounded random number generator would be given to 3rd party candidates.)
They couldn't just throw in 216,000 Biden votes into one precinct because it would be super obvious, and they couldn't just sprinkle them on the top of a bunch of different precincts because it would not guarantee them a victory and would put them at risk of overvoting on some precincts of other problems that could get them caught.
So they used this wheel method to come up with different ratios: 1/10, 4/65, some even favoring Trump. A whole bunch of them and mathematically calculated how many votes were needed in each bucket ratio to balance the votes across all of these ratios to GUARANTEE that the final result would be the ratio (72% Biden, 28% Trump) they want once everything was compiled. The guy in this video calls these "virtual precincts"
Then they needed to spread these votes out amongst the REAL precincts. They couldn't just assign fixed ratios permanently to one precinct because 1) it would be too obvious, and 2) a lot of the precincts didn't contain enough votes to make up the numbers. So they targeted mostly low turnout precincts (because they'd need to stuff real ballots in these actual precincts to make the results auditable. Might explain why there are SO MANY Biden only ballots, as well as the abnormally high turnout in some precincts) and added votes at these different fixed ratios in an algorithmically determined pattern. Once one precinct's maximum vote potential was nearly exhausted, the algorithm would stop in that precinct and pop up in another precinct, and another, and another, until that vote ratio hit it's "quota" to be balanced against all of the other ratios. That's why he can observe this repeatable pattern of a county reporting a certain ratio then falling off that ratio just before another county picks up that same ratio again.
The wheel number he calculated was something like 2200, which means that the largest common denominator of the fractional ratios that were applied was that wheel number, with dozens or hundreds of ratios balanced around their end goal result (which in Georgia was I think 14.6%).
I hope that this summary makes some degree of sense. Let me know if it sounds like I'm speaking crazy talk. It's late and this is complicated, lol.
We really do have the best autists, don't we folks..?
Edit: Solomon you have my highest respect for what you've done; I say that as a fellow autist. Kudos.
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlKSiT0b/we-have-the-best-autists-folks-i/c/
From what I understood from the last video, when Biden needed more votes, the Dominion software would target a random precinct and add votes for Biden at a 10:1 ratio (10 votes for Biden, 1 vote for Trump) for a short period of time.
Then the Dominion software would switch to a different precinct, and add fraudulent votes at the same ratio (10:1) in that new precinct, to prevent being detected.
The ratio of the fraudulent votes coming in could be changed at any time (to a 11:1 ratio, 9:1 ratio, 8:1 ratio, etc) to increase or decrease the amount of rigging, and to avoid being detected.
I believe the RIGGED VOTES were coming in like this:
This is a huge oversimplification and I think misses the point and the elegance of his idea somewhat.
From what I understood of his video, the democrats would have to have known what the real polling data was suggesting would happen in a natural election. Let's say it was 52:48 for Trump. They wanted to make sure to rig the election to make sure they actually got a 55:45 Biden win (for instance) since this is a safe margin of victory that's not too outrageous but large enough that it defies credulity to challenge it.
Let's say that they expected 1 million voters in the county they're looking at. They would leave about 70% of those votes untouched in their natural state to make things look natural. Then for the remaining 30%, they would simply substitute the real voting results with fake ones to make up the margin that they need to win by the desired amount. In my example, the 70% of votes that are untouched would be 364K T, 336K B. To win with a ratio of 55-45 with 1 million total votes, the remaining 300K votes would have to have NO MORE than 86K votes for Trump or 28% of the votes. The remaining 72% were would mostly be given to Biden, but some of them (calculated by a bounded random number generator would be given to 3rd party candidates.)
They couldn't just throw in 216,000 Biden votes into one precinct because it would be super obvious, and they couldn't just sprinkle them on the top of a bunch of different precincts because it would not guarantee them a victory and would put them at risk of overvoting on some precincts of other problems that could get them caught.
So they used this wheel method to come up with different ratios: 1/10, 4/65, some even favoring Trump. A whole bunch of them and mathematically calculated how many votes were needed in each bucket ratio to balance the votes across all of these ratios to GUARANTEE that the final result would be the ratio (72% Biden, 28% Trump) they want once everything was compiled. The guy in this video calls these "virtual precincts"
Then they needed to spread these votes out amongst the REAL precincts. They couldn't just assign fixed ratios permanently to one precinct because 1) it would be too obvious, and 2) a lot of the precincts didn't contain enough votes to make up the numbers. So they targeted mostly low turnout precincts (because they'd need to stuff real ballots in these actual precincts to make the results auditable. Might explain why there are SO MANY Biden only ballots, as well as the abnormally high turnout in some precincts) and added votes at these different fixed ratios in an algorithmically determined pattern. Once one precinct's maximum vote potential was nearly exhausted, the algorithm would stop in that precinct and pop up in another precinct, and another, and another, until that vote ratio hit it's "quota" to be balanced against all of the other ratios. That's why he can observe this repeatable pattern of a county reporting a certain ratio then falling off that ratio just before another county picks up that same ratio again.
The wheel number he calculated was something like 2200, which means that the largest common denominator of the fractional ratios that were applied was that wheel number, with dozens or hundreds of ratios balanced around their end goal result (which in Georgia was I think 14.6%).
I hope that this summary makes some degree of sense. Let me know if it sounds like I'm speaking crazy talk. It's late and this is complicated, lol.
Thank you pede, underrated comment - this sums it up well.