I am trying to parse this information for my non-mathematical brain. Is this what he is saying:
An algorithm of ratios were applied, but it was not the same across the board. A certain ratio, for example, 9:1, would be applied in one precinct over a period of time. Then it would stop and be applied to another precinct after. The ratio didn’t always have to be 9:1, it had a few different variations. But whatever ratio was used, was used in “batches” in different precincts consecutively, not simultaneously. But mostly in Fulton county it appears.
So while Shiva showed the “overall” ratio algorithm, this guy kind of shows what it actually looked at on the ground. It makes sense because if they always used same ratio in one precinct, it would be too obvious. So they moved it around and switched up the ratio slightly.
Is that a correct understanding of what is being presented?
Has anyone averaged all these ratios to see if they equal Shiva’s overall ratio of 10:3 in AZ (Biden:Trump) I think it was.
From what I saw yesterday, by using a random number, you can prove an algorithm was used because they will all revert to the same denominators.
In other words, they all revert to 14.65, and there is not 1 chance in 6 billion for that to happen. It's just not possible, we send people to prison for rape via those "RANDOM CHANCES".
I am trying to parse this information for my non-mathematical brain. Is this what he is saying:
An algorithm of ratios were applied, but it was not the same across the board. A certain ratio, for example, 9:1, would be applied in one precinct over a period of time. Then it would stop and be applied to another precinct after. The ratio didn’t always have to be 9:1, it had a few different variations. But whatever ratio was used, was used in “batches” in different precincts consecutively, not simultaneously. But mostly in Fulton county it appears.
So while Shiva showed the “overall” ratio algorithm, this guy kind of shows what it actually looked at on the ground. It makes sense because if they always used same ratio in one precinct, it would be too obvious. So they moved it around and switched up the ratio slightly.
Is that a correct understanding of what is being presented?
Has anyone averaged all these ratios to see if they equal Shiva’s overall ratio of 10:3 in AZ (Biden:Trump) I think it was.
From what I saw yesterday, by using a random number, you can prove an algorithm was used because they will all revert to the same denominators.
In other words, they all revert to 14.65, and there is not 1 chance in 6 billion for that to happen. It's just not possible, we send people to prison for rape via those "RANDOM CHANCES".
Please help me close the loop on this - How did they create corresponding paper ballots to account for the hand recounts?
I dont know.... but Dominion has capability of printing ballots.... just dont want to make that leap yet.