Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
And....they nobody tested this equipment out this way before the election...I would think that would be the first thing you would do before opening the precinct door....The whole dame nation is incompetent....at least the part in charge of elections.....
Most the machines received an “update” days before the or even after “certification “ but they also have thumb drives put in them constantly which could upload whatever they want. Many machines were also connected to the internet so anything was possible.
Interesting in and of itself - he says the hand recount showed a shift of 37 votes from Trump to Biden. He says nothing about what is in the Parler posting that looks like the ballots were re-run through the Tabulator and "those conducting the test were so shocked that they ran the same ballots again." That is, the Tabulator on the audit was STILL shifting votes. Is there any corroboration of that part. So on the one hand, it is a story about hand recounts not matching the initial tabulation, which is big. The second part is that there is a machine that when testing still is shifting votes - that one is harder to swallow and which this witness is not alleging.
I think the Story has been a victim of The Game of Telephone... he never says they put it back through.. he said hand counted... BUT what if we get more Hand counts.
throw it on the pile, excuse me, mountain of evidence that continues to be denied and ignored by MSM. when justice prevails, it will have been because a majority in SCOTUS has the BALLS to do it.
Twitter bio of the congressman: Proudly serving Georgia's 10th District |
@FreedomCaucus
Communications Chair |
@GOPOversight
Government Operations Subcommittee Ranking Member
Don’t hang your hat on the count distribution being static. It’s very possible to modify the coefficients in real-time only, meaning they are only stored in RAM and not persistently on disk, or compiled in. In fact IMO doing it persistently is stupid, if you have a back door available.
Personally I would DD the entire disk off one machine, block by block at a minimum for deep analysis. As well as log check the other machines
I was looking for a source and came across a Washington Examiner article "debunking" that the Trump campaign even snagged a Dominion machine two days ago. The entire article seemed to be smearing the idea of election tampering without evidence (and also didn't debunk that the Trump campaign got the machine). Is Washington Examiner cucked?
Is there a source for this?
https://georgiastarnews.com/2020/12/05/trump-legal-team-witness-alleged-that-ware-county-audit-results-revealed-dominion-machine-flipped-ballots-from-trump-to-biden/
https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/11/ware-county-confirmation.jpg
First im hearing of this, can we get a source?
And....they nobody tested this equipment out this way before the election...I would think that would be the first thing you would do before opening the precinct door....The whole dame nation is incompetent....at least the part in charge of elections.....
Most the machines received an “update” days before the or even after “certification “ but they also have thumb drives put in them constantly which could upload whatever they want. Many machines were also connected to the internet so anything was possible.
To have these kind of voting systems at all is really baffling. It checks all the specifikations where it shouldnt.
They work perfectly as election-stealing machines. That's what they were built for.
Its incompetent by design.
They can easily set a switch to turn on/off the algorithm.
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/12/05/co-founder-of-voterga-garland-favorito-discusses-being-cut-from-ware-county-georgia-testimony-on-dominion-algorithms/
Interesting in and of itself - he says the hand recount showed a shift of 37 votes from Trump to Biden. He says nothing about what is in the Parler posting that looks like the ballots were re-run through the Tabulator and "those conducting the test were so shocked that they ran the same ballots again." That is, the Tabulator on the audit was STILL shifting votes. Is there any corroboration of that part. So on the one hand, it is a story about hand recounts not matching the initial tabulation, which is big. The second part is that there is a machine that when testing still is shifting votes - that one is harder to swallow and which this witness is not alleging.
I think the Story has been a victim of The Game of Telephone... he never says they put it back through.. he said hand counted... BUT what if we get more Hand counts.
throw it on the pile, excuse me, mountain of evidence that continues to be denied and ignored by MSM. when justice prevails, it will have been because a majority in SCOTUS has the BALLS to do it.
America has the weirdests high performing outliers in the world- dont forget it!
24 hour wait. This is big, if true.
A comment in the Parler post says: "Source congressman Jody Hice on Twitter"
Twitter bio of the congressman: Proudly serving Georgia's 10th District | @FreedomCaucus Communications Chair | @GOPOversight Government Operations Subcommittee Ranking Member
Haven't found the tweet yet.
Hice tweet
Here’s a link. He mentions the 3rd as a point when a “forensic” exam of machine took place but the sauce needs a sauce.
Verify and make sticky
Don’t hang your hat on the count distribution being static. It’s very possible to modify the coefficients in real-time only, meaning they are only stored in RAM and not persistently on disk, or compiled in. In fact IMO doing it persistently is stupid, if you have a back door available.
Personally I would DD the entire disk off one machine, block by block at a minimum for deep analysis. As well as log check the other machines
I was looking for a source and came across a Washington Examiner article "debunking" that the Trump campaign even snagged a Dominion machine two days ago. The entire article seemed to be smearing the idea of election tampering without evidence (and also didn't debunk that the Trump campaign got the machine). Is Washington Examiner cucked?
I can’t find the original tweet about this. Anyone have a source beyond parlor?
Congressman Jody Hice on Twitter.
I went to her Twitter and I could not find this
Gretchen Whitmer’s anus if true
Wish you hadn't said that - now I can't get that image out of my mind