Intent has to be unambiguously attached to intentional irregularities as the rational explanation- one accident or anomaly sure- but what must be proven just by clear presentation is the concert- have you noticed nobody has claimed at all an irregularity favouring Trump?
Intent has to be unambiguously attached to intentional irregularities as the rational explanation- one accident or anomaly sure- but what must be proven just by clear presentation is the concert- have you noticed nobody has claimed at all an irregularity favouring Trump?