There're a lot of circular referencing over there, i.e. wikipedia referencing a source, and the source referencing wikipedia. You'll never know where that piece of information really came from and if it's factual.
Despite its problems, I used to have respect for Wikipedia. Far as I'm concerned, it can be no more or less inaccurate, incorrect or biased than any other academic encyclopedia. I thought it was a decent service, as good as it could be, not to mention exactly what the internet was envisioned for...
... then it got taken over by commies like everything else.
There're a lot of circular referencing over there, i.e. wikipedia referencing a source, and the source referencing wikipedia. You'll never know where that piece of information really came from and if it's factual.
Right this circular stuff of results all cycling back to wikipedia was a yuge issue in google for a while. Or I was the only one annoyed by that.
Despite its problems, I used to have respect for Wikipedia. Far as I'm concerned, it can be no more or less inaccurate, incorrect or biased than any other academic encyclopedia. I thought it was a decent service, as good as it could be, not to mention exactly what the internet was envisioned for...
... then it got taken over by commies like everything else.