27
Comments (15)
sorted by:
5
EdwardSolomon 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ok, so explain how I found a solution to a reverse floor function (wheel number that was equal to 2231) and then proved that the algorithm started with equal weight on each ratio (same number of total votes per hijacked precinct) and used simple vector addition to move the weights and maintain the same average.

1
Bangarang1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you tell me what the 0.1465 represents at 1:06:26 of your part 2 video? Is that the percentage of votes that are being swapped?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
john1234 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is a true fucking banana republic if the actual numbers are not public

Because it is impossible for anyone to verify to total counts for the state, if

-only the total votes for the state are public

-any vote counter / observer has been present in only one counting location, for only a part of the time, and not 24/7

Every single batch reported to the total sums by every single vote counter should be public, so that the counters+observers can see that their numbers were correct - and that anyone can then sum up the different numbers from different counters & get the correct numbers for the state.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
NZ_needs_a_Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

So is this invalid then?

https://thedonald.win/p/11QlKSgp33/edward-solomon-shares-laymans-ve/c/

Are you saying that it updates new votes in pre-set batch amounts?

1
NeoSprtacus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you point to where to get more refined data? I previously had some precinct data but it only contained 4 hours of reporting.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
unfiltered 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://thedonald.win/p/11QRov5EwD/timeseries-precinct-data-files-f/sort=new

Not sure what the OP's "proof" was. I think the data speaks for itself.

1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

What country are you from, adamschiffsneck2?

I noticed you used the non-American spelling "apologise" instead of "apologize" here:

https://thedonald.win/p/11QlKPIB3H/x/c/4Dqc4kfVg2z?d=50

BTW, I have a screenshot of that linked post, so don't think that editing it will be a valid cover for you.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why does an Australian have such a keen interest in the minutiae of an American election? And why do you say "we" in some of your posts, as if you had a personal stake in this election? Were you attempting to pose as an American?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
AnonymousR 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why does this thread have no OP post?