Bit of a controversial thought: But I find the mainstream media to be a highly reliable source of news. Every day I flip through MSNBC, CNN, and the BBC and watch about ten minutes of each. Whatever all three are talking about that day is the opposite of what actually happened. Bonus points if they all use the same script.
I would agree with this. I clocked the potential election fraud months before, when the BBC started repeating that "there is no evidence that mail in ballots are less secure". No, you don't need evidence of that sweetie, its inherently obvious to a 4 year old child. So why are you telling me otherwise? Why are you trying to convince me the sky isn't blue? and low and behold come election night, mail in ballot fraud. Somehow the BBC knew months in advance.
Pedes, Former Law Enforcement. That's not Elena Parent in the Election Photo.
Observations:
The arms are too fat on the woman in the Election Photo, you can make comparisons to the arm structure here, although it is an older photo, it shows an Ecto-Mesomorph Bodytype, whereas the woman in the film/photo is a Meso-Endomorph, leaning Endomorph: https://www.thecrier.net/image_6a7f9944-a835-11e0-832d-001cc4c002e0.html Elena did not lose 20-30 lbs between Election Day, and change scientific body types, before her presence at the hearings. In fact, Elena's weight appears consistent over the past number of years, and her arms are relatively toned, as she is naturally an Ecto-Mesomorph.
Elena Parent has a natural irregular curl pattern to her hair, damage from peroxide bleach, on 2/3 of her length, and a persistent flare outward at the shoulder level, existing across numerous photos. Her hair ends in more stressed/ damaged hair and split ends. She does not have a taper, and shows no apparent layers. She's a Mom, and a "Career Gal", her hair is not a primary concern, it's secondary. (Your hair looks like shit Elena)
If you examine Elena's facial structure, the orbital sockets, brow ridge, and high angular cheek bones, create in combination a rectangular or squaring effect of her eyebrows, and the area around her eyes. This is consistent with the angular squaring of her jawbone, giving her more of a squared/ box angular face over all. Her eyes are set more deeply into this bone/facial structure than the woman in the Election Photo. Elena's facial structure is very distinct.
The woman in the Election Photo is heavier set than Elena, the arms and midsection do not match in that she is significantly heavier. The woman in the Election photo also has a more rounded facial structure on the edges around the eyes and cheek bones, lacking the same boxing of the orbital/brow structure, and also demonstrating a larger forehead. The woman in the Election Photo and film also has more of a peaked arch at the apex of her larger forehead at the hairline. This is distinctly different than Elena Parent.
The woman in the photo has naturally straighter hair, and has layered hair, demonstrating a tapered cut, which hangs more inwardly curling, which is opposite of Elena's natural flare outward. This hair is clearly thicker, and longer than Elena Parent's hair, and is clearly lacking the split ends/ frazzled/ damaged look.
Both women appear Caucasian and of Central/ Northern European Ancestry. Both are natural brunettes, who use hair bleach and dye. Facial recognition software would fail to confirm they are the same woman easily. Anyone who says they've used software successfully to create probability match is being dishonest. Any other trained observer/ investigator should also be able to make the same confirmations of difference between the two women.
Don't get trapped in this rabbit hole, or promote it. It's a distraction, and it makes us look bad, discrediting our Group Source/ Group Intelligence Capabilities. We're far better at analysis than this.
Looks to me like the same woman that has had her hair done in the last 30 days. The picture you provided doesnt look like either of the op pictures either. Shes also wearing a black loose jacket at the hearings instead of a fitted hoodie so the arm size could be deceiving. Her eyebrow appears at different angles because her HEAD is at different angles. Her hair looks a little more fluffed in the election night picture because she was working and its HARD work cheating all night. She wasnt wearing her wring because she was working with her hands for im sure an extended period of time. When she knew she would be on camera she had on her rock. The second woman is a dead ringer for the election night photo. Has the same hair, same eye shape and eyebrow shape. Now i have no evidence to sit here and say i KNOW its them but quite frankly you dont either to say its not.
Are you a female? Do you know anything about hairstyles? Do you know anything about lingerie? It is the same crazy-eyed woman and it is you who is trying to gaslight and psy-ops
I think you're actually correct though. The entire point of the media, advertising, etc is to get us to do things or go along with things we normally wouldn't and shouldn't. To make us interested in things or up for things we normally wouldn't waste our time with. There's normally a reason for that. They're not good things. They might be good for someone but not us.
So basically everything they say is what not to do. I treat adverts like that most of the time but it should be extended to main stream news.
Bit of a controversial thought: But I find the mainstream media to be a highly reliable source of news. Every day I flip through MSNBC, CNN, and the BBC and watch about ten minutes of each. Whatever all three are talking about that day is the opposite of what actually happened. Bonus points if they all use the same script.
I would agree with this. I clocked the potential election fraud months before, when the BBC started repeating that "there is no evidence that mail in ballots are less secure". No, you don't need evidence of that sweetie, its inherently obvious to a 4 year old child. So why are you telling me otherwise? Why are you trying to convince me the sky isn't blue? and low and behold come election night, mail in ballot fraud. Somehow the BBC knew months in advance.
Hijack for visibility:
Pedes, Former Law Enforcement. That's not Elena Parent in the Election Photo.
Observations:
The arms are too fat on the woman in the Election Photo, you can make comparisons to the arm structure here, although it is an older photo, it shows an Ecto-Mesomorph Bodytype, whereas the woman in the film/photo is a Meso-Endomorph, leaning Endomorph: https://www.thecrier.net/image_6a7f9944-a835-11e0-832d-001cc4c002e0.html Elena did not lose 20-30 lbs between Election Day, and change scientific body types, before her presence at the hearings. In fact, Elena's weight appears consistent over the past number of years, and her arms are relatively toned, as she is naturally an Ecto-Mesomorph.
Further side profile image analysis: https://i.maga.host/FWv0aHC.png
Elena Parent has a natural irregular curl pattern to her hair, damage from peroxide bleach, on 2/3 of her length, and a persistent flare outward at the shoulder level, existing across numerous photos. Her hair ends in more stressed/ damaged hair and split ends. She does not have a taper, and shows no apparent layers. She's a Mom, and a "Career Gal", her hair is not a primary concern, it's secondary. (Your hair looks like shit Elena)
If you examine Elena's facial structure, the orbital sockets, brow ridge, and high angular cheek bones, create in combination a rectangular or squaring effect of her eyebrows, and the area around her eyes. This is consistent with the angular squaring of her jawbone, giving her more of a squared/ box angular face over all. Her eyes are set more deeply into this bone/facial structure than the woman in the Election Photo. Elena's facial structure is very distinct.
The woman in the Election Photo is heavier set than Elena, the arms and midsection do not match in that she is significantly heavier. The woman in the Election photo also has a more rounded facial structure on the edges around the eyes and cheek bones, lacking the same boxing of the orbital/brow structure, and also demonstrating a larger forehead. The woman in the Election Photo and film also has more of a peaked arch at the apex of her larger forehead at the hairline. This is distinctly different than Elena Parent.
The woman in the photo has naturally straighter hair, and has layered hair, demonstrating a tapered cut, which hangs more inwardly curling, which is opposite of Elena's natural flare outward. This hair is clearly thicker, and longer than Elena Parent's hair, and is clearly lacking the split ends/ frazzled/ damaged look.
Both women appear Caucasian and of Central/ Northern European Ancestry. Both are natural brunettes, who use hair bleach and dye. Facial recognition software would fail to confirm they are the same woman easily. Anyone who says they've used software successfully to create probability match is being dishonest. Any other trained observer/ investigator should also be able to make the same confirmations of difference between the two women.
Don't get trapped in this rabbit hole, or promote it. It's a distraction, and it makes us look bad, discrediting our Group Source/ Group Intelligence Capabilities. We're far better at analysis than this.
Ok then present who those 2 poll workers are then, simple!
Not my job. You have the data, go for it.
Check the sticky on the front page. Those are two different states.
Looks to me like the same woman that has had her hair done in the last 30 days. The picture you provided doesnt look like either of the op pictures either. Shes also wearing a black loose jacket at the hearings instead of a fitted hoodie so the arm size could be deceiving. Her eyebrow appears at different angles because her HEAD is at different angles. Her hair looks a little more fluffed in the election night picture because she was working and its HARD work cheating all night. She wasnt wearing her wring because she was working with her hands for im sure an extended period of time. When she knew she would be on camera she had on her rock. The second woman is a dead ringer for the election night photo. Has the same hair, same eye shape and eyebrow shape. Now i have no evidence to sit here and say i KNOW its them but quite frankly you dont either to say its not.
Are you a female? Do you know anything about hairstyles? Do you know anything about lingerie? It is the same crazy-eyed woman and it is you who is trying to gaslight and psy-ops
Female Pedes last evening were laughing at everyone, and were in total agreement with me. You're clueless.
wearing two shirts. why her arms appear bigger. a short sleeve over a long sleeve.
I personally treat the news like a random content generator. Nothing these people say
I think you're actually correct though. The entire point of the media, advertising, etc is to get us to do things or go along with things we normally wouldn't and shouldn't. To make us interested in things or up for things we normally wouldn't waste our time with. There's normally a reason for that. They're not good things. They might be good for someone but not us.
So basically everything they say is what not to do. I treat adverts like that most of the time but it should be extended to main stream news.
Reminds me ofMIB when they go to the news stand and use the tabloids to get the actual news.
ThIs iS tHE BegInNing Of ThE EnD for DonAld TruMP
The compilation videos and salt we mine when Trumps inaugurated will be legendary.