StOp SpReAdInG misinformation! Another senator spotting counting ballots. No way this isn't both caught red handed. The media is just gaslighting us by saying this isn't them.
(media.thedonald.win)
🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
posted ago by Diotima
+1402 / -2
Bit of a controversial thought: But I find the mainstream media to be a highly reliable source of news. Every day I flip through MSNBC, CNN, and the BBC and watch about ten minutes of each. Whatever all three are talking about that day is the opposite of what actually happened. Bonus points if they all use the same script.
I would agree with this. I clocked the potential election fraud months before, when the BBC started repeating that "there is no evidence that mail in ballots are less secure". No, you don't need evidence of that sweetie, its inherently obvious to a 4 year old child. So why are you telling me otherwise? Why are you trying to convince me the sky isn't blue? and low and behold come election night, mail in ballot fraud. Somehow the BBC knew months in advance.
Hijack for visibility:
Pedes, Former Law Enforcement. That's not Elena Parent in the Election Photo.
Observations:
The arms are too fat on the woman in the Election Photo, you can make comparisons to the arm structure here, although it is an older photo, it shows an Ecto-Mesomorph Bodytype, whereas the woman in the film/photo is a Meso-Endomorph, leaning Endomorph: https://www.thecrier.net/image_6a7f9944-a835-11e0-832d-001cc4c002e0.html Elena did not lose 20-30 lbs between Election Day, and change scientific body types, before her presence at the hearings. In fact, Elena's weight appears consistent over the past number of years, and her arms are relatively toned, as she is naturally an Ecto-Mesomorph.
Further side profile image analysis: https://i.maga.host/FWv0aHC.png
Elena Parent has a natural irregular curl pattern to her hair, damage from peroxide bleach, on 2/3 of her length, and a persistent flare outward at the shoulder level, existing across numerous photos. Her hair ends in more stressed/ damaged hair and split ends. She does not have a taper, and shows no apparent layers. She's a Mom, and a "Career Gal", her hair is not a primary concern, it's secondary. (Your hair looks like shit Elena)
If you examine Elena's facial structure, the orbital sockets, brow ridge, and high angular cheek bones, create in combination a rectangular or squaring effect of her eyebrows, and the area around her eyes. This is consistent with the angular squaring of her jawbone, giving her more of a squared/ box angular face over all. Her eyes are set more deeply into this bone/facial structure than the woman in the Election Photo. Elena's facial structure is very distinct.
The woman in the Election Photo is heavier set than Elena, the arms and midsection do not match in that she is significantly heavier. The woman in the Election photo also has a more rounded facial structure on the edges around the eyes and cheek bones, lacking the same boxing of the orbital/brow structure, and also demonstrating a larger forehead. The woman in the Election Photo and film also has more of a peaked arch at the apex of her larger forehead at the hairline. This is distinctly different than Elena Parent.
The woman in the photo has naturally straighter hair, and has layered hair, demonstrating a tapered cut, which hangs more inwardly curling, which is opposite of Elena's natural flare outward. This hair is clearly thicker, and longer than Elena Parent's hair, and is clearly lacking the split ends/ frazzled/ damaged look.
Both women appear Caucasian and of Central/ Northern European Ancestry. Both are natural brunettes, who use hair bleach and dye. Facial recognition software would fail to confirm they are the same woman easily. Anyone who says they've used software successfully to create probability match is being dishonest. Any other trained observer/ investigator should also be able to make the same confirmations of difference between the two women.
Don't get trapped in this rabbit hole, or promote it. It's a distraction, and it makes us look bad, discrediting our Group Source/ Group Intelligence Capabilities. We're far better at analysis than this.
Ok then present who those 2 poll workers are then, simple!
Not my job. You have the data, go for it.
You’re the one who sounds you have all the data go ahead and YOU prove it then!
That's exactly what burns analysis hours, Pede. That's our opposition's objective/ goal set. Learn PSYOPS and Study Propaganda. You're getting Mind-Fucked.
We're on a time clock, and they know it.
You have an opinion, like we have an opinion....neither is proof.
“Former law enforcement?” That doesn’t help your argument here.
Context for years of training and field experience in Positive ID. Seems critically missing from a lot of observers and theorists here.
Says some guy on the internet, I’m “some guy” too....and just saying your claims are no better/worse than some other observations.
However, I personally find it unlikely an elitist democrat politician(s) would lower themselves to manual labor.
Check the sticky on the front page. Those are two different states.
Yea I’m sure media can be trusted for reliable non fake reporting, in your dreams.
I did not refer to any media. It was a Pede's post, very thorough, and showing that one pic was from GA. and the other from PA. With receipts.
Looks to me like the same woman that has had her hair done in the last 30 days. The picture you provided doesnt look like either of the op pictures either. Shes also wearing a black loose jacket at the hearings instead of a fitted hoodie so the arm size could be deceiving. Her eyebrow appears at different angles because her HEAD is at different angles. Her hair looks a little more fluffed in the election night picture because she was working and its HARD work cheating all night. She wasnt wearing her wring because she was working with her hands for im sure an extended period of time. When she knew she would be on camera she had on her rock. The second woman is a dead ringer for the election night photo. Has the same hair, same eye shape and eyebrow shape. Now i have no evidence to sit here and say i KNOW its them but quite frankly you dont either to say its not.
Are you a female? Do you know anything about hairstyles? Do you know anything about lingerie? It is the same crazy-eyed woman and it is you who is trying to gaslight and psy-ops
Female Pedes last evening were laughing at everyone, and were in total agreement with me. You're clueless.
wearing two shirts. why her arms appear bigger. a short sleeve over a long sleeve.
I personally treat the news like a random content generator. Nothing these people say
I think you're actually correct though. The entire point of the media, advertising, etc is to get us to do things or go along with things we normally wouldn't and shouldn't. To make us interested in things or up for things we normally wouldn't waste our time with. There's normally a reason for that. They're not good things. They might be good for someone but not us.
So basically everything they say is what not to do. I treat adverts like that most of the time but it should be extended to main stream news.
Reminds me ofMIB when they go to the news stand and use the tabloids to get the actual news.
ThIs iS tHE BegInNing Of ThE EnD for DonAld TruMP
The compilation videos and salt we mine when Trumps inaugurated will be legendary.
Even the face mask matches
Good catch
also look at hair line where it parts...
There is also a silver bracelet on Elena Parents left wrist that appears in the photo and that she wears to the hearing
Yup
They were both up for election this year too. Seems a little sketchy that you can count ballots in a race where you’re on the ballot.
I asked that elsewhere; thanks for clearing that up. If they’re on the ballot somewhere, they shouldn’t be be allowed to count votes anywhere. One of these two is named Parent. What is the other woman’s name?
I think this is the second lady.
https://ballotpedia.org/Jen_Jordan
I think the guy in the photo may also be familiar. Was he on that zoom call?
https://advance.lexis.com/api/document/collection/statutes-legislation/id/617D-MH91-FBN1-22KG-00008-00?cite=O.C.G.A.%20%C2%A7%2021-2-414&context=1000516
O.C.G.A. § 21-2-414
§ 21-2-414. Restrictions on campaign activities and public opinion polling within the vicinity of a polling place; cellular phone use prohibited; prohibition of candidates from entering certain polling places; penalty
(d) No person whose name appears as a candidate on the ballot being voted upon at a primary, election, special primary, or special election, except a judge of the probate court serving as the election superintendent, shall physically enter any polling place other than the polling place at which that person is authorized to cast his or her ballot for that primary, election, special primary, or special election and, after casting his or her ballot, the candidate shall not return to such polling place until after the poll has closed and voting has ceased or other than to transact business with the board of registrars, so long as the person does not violate any other provision of this Code section. Judges of the probate court serving as election superintendents shall enter polling places only as necessary to fulfill their duties as election superintendents and shall not engage in any practice prohibited by this Code section.
And they should stop wasting their breath because trying to convince the people on this site doesn't do SHIT. They need to convince those who took the pictures and video, who obviously knew WHO to take pictures and video of. And that's right, you won't convince them. No matter how many times you say "it's not them", "it's not them," "it's not them", "it's not them", "it's not them," "it's not them", "it's not them", "it's not them," "it's not them", "it's not them", "it's not them," "it's not them", "it's not them", "it's not them," "it's not them", it's still them.
The "it's not them" crowd is dreaming. THOSE ARE THE SAME WOMEN, it is not even a question. WTF, we're supposed to believe the two senators who were saying "there is no evidence of fraud!!!!!" while sweating and shaking nervously just HAPPEN to look EXACTLY LIKE but not actually BE the two women committing fraud in this photograph?
It's still them!
FYI ...
Ralph Jones, Fulton County Regsitration Chief, is the man in the red shirt in the security footage overnight.
The entire Dem team of elections in Fulton County is in on this steal.
Pic: https://www.ajc.com/resizer/FLSaVbeiJLuPLuMMJmZN0osEIlI=/1066x600/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/ajc/IOONMEWVLJTW5ENRZASATGTZZY.jpg
Sort of explains the 109% registration rate in Fulton County, doesn't it?
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlKPHu0H/tom-fitton-judicial-watch-study-/c/
Why are all riggers mostly black it seems? Weird.
why do they claim only 4 people in that video when it looks like at least 6 were there.
TRAITORS TRAITORS TRAITORS!!!
These are absolutely the same women. They are full on busted.
Right, and don’t just say ‘These are not the women you’re looking for’ present who the other women are in person with their poll worker credentials verified. I guarantee they can’t!
A article I looked up mention it and claimed it was debunked. (lol)
https://www.ajc.com/politics/georgia-democratic-senator-receives-death-threats-after-election-hearing/BDMC2DNIGNE2DC6S5YMCCZ4FBA/
Came just for this ..
DEBOOONNNKKKED
Not trying to be a contrarian but it appears that the two ladies in the top frame are from an AP video taken in Pennsylvania. Maybe they’re the same people..just pointing this out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RkBbtrz_I4
Then they need to name who the look-alike women are, that would be amazing but they’ll never do it because they can’t.
yes I agree but also i dont put it past them to cross state lines to participate in a grand scale fraud scheme.
Considering PA was arguably more important also. It is definitely plausible
They are so dumb, it takes 2 of them to make 1 idiot
It’s definitely them! If they’re trying to convince it isn’t, then produce these 2 poll workers have them come forward do an ID check and verify them! But they CAN’T do that, because it’s Elena Parent and her cohort there 100%!
Her eyebrows match, too. Like an inverted Nike swoosh.
Eyebrows look thicker/darker in the top one. Hair texture looks different (bottom one looks like the hairs are thinner).
Literally the same mask ahahaha
This is a still of the exact video OAN has been running.
Has anyone sent this to her yet. Certainly she likes tweets and emails with her mug.
These masks provide enough plausible deniability for a lotta shit, eh?
Not true because facial recognition software can positively ID you with a mask and sunglasses on, research it, China has had this in place for 5 years at least and if it’s Chinese software then that means it’s in place here.
These are not the same people. This cannot be proven and is ripe for giving counter arguments to the enemy. Stop chasing phantoms. Focus on what we do have that is solid and provable.
I would agree except the top picture was taken in PA
That looks like the same face mask.
I agree, I read the debunking post and re its photos: the girl they say it really is has on a green sweater not a grey one. Plus the blonde they show has fuller hair that is recently colored.
We need to find and delete that person's earlier post discrediting this clear participation by these two goofs
Are they not allowed to?
Both of the girls are the same. lol The senator idiot that said DEBOOONKED was there too
If you go to her IG her hair has been the same length and color as it was at the hearings since before the election. The woman in the blurry photo resembles her but her hair is way too long and thick to be Senator Karen.
Read, Learn and pound into commie brains, Parent is guilty https://newdealleaders.org/news/newdeal-forum-urges-immediate-broadband-acccess-funding-from-congress/
KAREN AND BECKY look exactly like every other Karen and Becky.
To be fair, surely they are allowed to count anyway? I know R poll watchers were not there but, there job would have been to make sure nothing bad happened. I would say 99% of counters have a bias making the whole reason for poll watchers.
So even if it is them, they can just say 'yeah poll watchers made sure we didn't cheat'