**Allied Securities Operation Group and Village of Central Lake resident William Bailey will take forensic images of the county's 22 tabulators and review other election related material Sunday following a Friday court order allowing for the review. **
Antrim County Administrator Pete Garwood and county Clerk Sheryl Guy will be in attendance, according to a statement from the county.
"The imaging is expected to take hours, no timeline has been given for the forensic team’s investigation and results," the statement said.
Trump's campaign celebrated the review, with lawyer Jenna Ellis arguing on Fox News Sunday that the judge had granted "our team" access to the Dominion Voting Systems tabulators. She said the team would be there for roughly eight hours Sunday.
This news is getting widely reported, shockingly, even by several of the bigger outlets. Does anyone think that if Flynn, who has been all over the news, especially in the past couple of weeks, was involved, no one would be reporting it?
Forget the media. Ellis and Giuliaini are beating the drum on this all over the place. Don't you think they'd mention Flynn if he was involved?
Forget both of those things. Flynn has precisely zero experience of any kind related to forensic examinations of digital hardware or software. For what purpose would he be involved?
Then go back and read the cd article. It reads like LARP and they cite no sources for their information.
Side note: I appreciate your asking questions and willingness to consider information.
Flynn is a hero. I've got nothing against him.
My issue is that real, tangible evidence is beginning to coalesce. Flooding the zone with incorrect information and LARP crap damages real evidence and information.
We all get righteously pissed off about the media flooding the zone with fake, lefttard bullshit without evidence because it discredits real information. We should be just as pissed about people posting bullshit that we like, just because it's what we want to hear.
We all need to check our sources and verify things. I don't want to see more cases getting tossed out of court because judges are able to cite 15 other recent court decisions citing evidence that seems similar but was actually crap.
Never forget that, for a whole lot of people, this is a giant graft opportunity. Question all sources. Look for primary source documents and information.
24 hours later: Flynn continues to tweet about pretty much everything in the world except being involved in one of the most important events in election history.
To everyone who has been name calling and downvoting... Why doesn't Flynn seem know that he was very busy making forensic copies of hard drives yesterday nor does he seem to know anything about getting his picture taken so that he can be doxxed by reporters? Where are these alleged pictures?
The very same crooked internationally-linked software was used to successfully fix elections throughout the world over the past 30 years.
The US and the 5E either knew, or should have known about these fake election destabilization schemes.
Trump now has that evidence in hand.
Trump was previously stymied in his efforts to declassify materials by CIA Director Haspel and several other connected IC individuals.
All of the previously declass-blocking individuals (including Dir. Haspel who is currently MIA) have now been removed by Trump.
Would any of the above tend to justify Trump's continued swagger?
If you've read this far, you may next opine what the foreseeable geopolitical ramifications would be for both the US and involved 5E countries if the any of the above would be revealed in documentary and legally-actionable form.
Also, please try to use more civility in your replies to others. Please don't forget that we are all on the same team here. It's just as easy to type "I believe you are mistaken" as "why are you posting crackpot bullshit?"
IMO, it's impossible to offer an meaningful opinion, since all items are speculative.
I do find it implausible to believe, at the very least, that anyone in the U.S. in elected office and many in non elected positions are unaware of the fraud. I base this opinion on MI, for example, where the universal response to substantial amounts of precincts being out of balance is, "It's always like that" and insisting that certification board votes are "ministerial" then 5 minutes later using these votes as evidence of unquestionable legitimacy and rock solid validation.
Justification for swagger? I doubt it. Trump swaggers even when he knows he's dead wrong. It's part of his... charm? I don't read his swagger one way or another.
To your comment about civility. I agree entirely. If you read through my comments, I try to ask questions or offer what I am seeing that contradicts things first. This is generally met with name calling and similar juvenile responses, similar to what we all condemn about the left and are inherent in social media. To these things, I try to offer as reasoned a response as possible in most cases.
I will reiterate that I try. Sometimes I fail. Sometimes things are just so flat out ridiculous that I feel calling it what it is is a more appropriate response. Regardless of exceptions, I agree with you.
Even a written confession by a defendant without any corroboration is also speculative.
So, we would be talking about facts which have some level of corroboration.
Take for example the subject of the agency gaming foreign elections. Do you believe that there is no evidence of this?
But if this subject does not interest you, then you do not need to engage in it.
It does seem to me that all in all, Trump has never been Nixon. The Leftists insistence of trying to make Trump rhyme with Nixon have been incredibly myopic of Trump's personal sense of what is Good for the Republic.
If Trump has such evidence, which I believe that he does, then it makes complete sense why Trump has been positioning his own IC resources to make such a full disclosure if it becomes final that he won't stay in office.
How would such a full disclosure affect us geopolitically? There are far too many "ends" of loose strings here even to imagine. However, I don't think it would be "Good". That's for certain. We, myself included, are products of the times in which we were raised and the events that we lived through. For example, I understand why Nixon resigned. I still support the ideology behind his resignation. But I also am not so naive to know that those days are long behind us. Under today's rules, Nixon would never have resigned and he would have outlasted the ensuing impeachment efforts. After that, it would have been politically moot.
Flynn has nothing to do with this. Stop posting clickbait bullshit.
Do you have anything that says otherwise? Is CDmedia making shit up? Just curious. I'm not opposed to hearing what you have to say.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/05/antrim-co-judge-orders-preservation-tabulators-election-materials/3841276001/
What about that precludes the possibility of Flynn being involved with the team? What am I missing here
Respectfully- common sense.
This news is getting widely reported, shockingly, even by several of the bigger outlets. Does anyone think that if Flynn, who has been all over the news, especially in the past couple of weeks, was involved, no one would be reporting it?
Forget the media. Ellis and Giuliaini are beating the drum on this all over the place. Don't you think they'd mention Flynn if he was involved?
Forget both of those things. Flynn has precisely zero experience of any kind related to forensic examinations of digital hardware or software. For what purpose would he be involved?
Then go back and read the cd article. It reads like LARP and they cite no sources for their information.
Side note: I appreciate your asking questions and willingness to consider information.
Flynn is a hero. I've got nothing against him.
My issue is that real, tangible evidence is beginning to coalesce. Flooding the zone with incorrect information and LARP crap damages real evidence and information.
We all get righteously pissed off about the media flooding the zone with fake, lefttard bullshit without evidence because it discredits real information. We should be just as pissed about people posting bullshit that we like, just because it's what we want to hear.
We all need to check our sources and verify things. I don't want to see more cases getting tossed out of court because judges are able to cite 15 other recent court decisions citing evidence that seems similar but was actually crap.
Never forget that, for a whole lot of people, this is a giant graft opportunity. Question all sources. Look for primary source documents and information.
24 hours later: Flynn continues to tweet about pretty much everything in the world except being involved in one of the most important events in election history.
https://twitter.com/GenFlynn
To everyone who has been name calling and downvoting... Why doesn't Flynn seem know that he was very busy making forensic copies of hard drives yesterday nor does he seem to know anything about getting his picture taken so that he can be doxxed by reporters? Where are these alleged pictures?
Consider the following:
The very same crooked internationally-linked software was used to successfully fix elections throughout the world over the past 30 years.
The US and the 5E either knew, or should have known about these fake election destabilization schemes.
Trump now has that evidence in hand.
Trump was previously stymied in his efforts to declassify materials by CIA Director Haspel and several other connected IC individuals.
All of the previously declass-blocking individuals (including Dir. Haspel who is currently MIA) have now been removed by Trump.
Would any of the above tend to justify Trump's continued swagger?
If you've read this far, you may next opine what the foreseeable geopolitical ramifications would be for both the US and involved 5E countries if the any of the above would be revealed in documentary and legally-actionable form.
Also, please try to use more civility in your replies to others. Please don't forget that we are all on the same team here. It's just as easy to type "I believe you are mistaken" as "why are you posting crackpot bullshit?"
To your items for consideration:
IMO, it's impossible to offer an meaningful opinion, since all items are speculative.
I do find it implausible to believe, at the very least, that anyone in the U.S. in elected office and many in non elected positions are unaware of the fraud. I base this opinion on MI, for example, where the universal response to substantial amounts of precincts being out of balance is, "It's always like that" and insisting that certification board votes are "ministerial" then 5 minutes later using these votes as evidence of unquestionable legitimacy and rock solid validation.
Justification for swagger? I doubt it. Trump swaggers even when he knows he's dead wrong. It's part of his... charm? I don't read his swagger one way or another.
To your comment about civility. I agree entirely. If you read through my comments, I try to ask questions or offer what I am seeing that contradicts things first. This is generally met with name calling and similar juvenile responses, similar to what we all condemn about the left and are inherent in social media. To these things, I try to offer as reasoned a response as possible in most cases.
I will reiterate that I try. Sometimes I fail. Sometimes things are just so flat out ridiculous that I feel calling it what it is is a more appropriate response. Regardless of exceptions, I agree with you.
Even a written confession by a defendant without any corroboration is also speculative.
So, we would be talking about facts which have some level of corroboration.
Take for example the subject of the agency gaming foreign elections. Do you believe that there is no evidence of this?
But if this subject does not interest you, then you do not need to engage in it.
It does seem to me that all in all, Trump has never been Nixon. The Leftists insistence of trying to make Trump rhyme with Nixon have been incredibly myopic of Trump's personal sense of what is Good for the Republic.
If Trump has such evidence, which I believe that he does, then it makes complete sense why Trump has been positioning his own IC resources to make such a full disclosure if it becomes final that he won't stay in office.
How would such a full disclosure affect us geopolitically? There are far too many "ends" of loose strings here even to imagine. However, I don't think it would be "Good". That's for certain. We, myself included, are products of the times in which we were raised and the events that we lived through. For example, I understand why Nixon resigned. I still support the ideology behind his resignation. But I also am not so naive to know that those days are long behind us. Under today's rules, Nixon would never have resigned and he would have outlasted the ensuing impeachment efforts. After that, it would have been politically moot.