1170
Comments (29)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
Carbum 6 points ago +7 / -1

Yeah.... meaning 10k didn't make a Rumble to follow him there. He was already hugely popular.. so of course it was faster.

5
kebabdrogo 5 points ago +5 / -0

No way moving from Youtube to Rumble has a 90% retention rate.

2
VP_Unchained 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rumble really needs a "LIVE" BROADCAST function among other things..

1
Carbum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not the point. Common sense will tell you why it was faster. Dan is just pushing Rumble with a telemarketing narrative.. seems to be working.

And why wouldn't it have 90%? He's on the internet. Its not like he's really famous besides the internet. I know about rumble... because Dan bought into it.. I know about parler because Dan bought into it.

You're not gonna make that argument with me personally and win.

2
ironhorse 2 points ago +2 / -0

This how he did it. Damn near every episode he talked about moving to rumble.

1
kebabdrogo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not the point. Common sense will tell you he had more than 734k subs on youtube.

1
Carbum 1 point ago +1 / -0

No.. that would actually be a conspiracy theory. 🤡

1
jbDonuts 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd be surprised if it had a 25% retention rate