3965
Comments (245)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
12
GovShitmer 12 points ago +19 / -7

At this point I want a civil war no matter the outcome of the election fraud. Our enemies have grown too bold.

20
Barthaneous 20 points ago +20 / -0

We should all want justice. And want evil people DEAD. ANYONE who thinks prison is fine for treason, pedophilia and sedition is not a good person.

The land and the people can not have peace as long as this form of evil continues to be able to survive. It must be quenched immediately

6
Bomberman 6 points ago +7 / -1

Elena Parent will be the first example.

4
Johnfox13 4 points ago +4 / -0

People are angry. Loaded elections means we are all taxed without representation. Last time that happened?

3
540k-Again 3 points ago +3 / -0

Haven't had a congressman in 11 months bc swamp/deepstate/dems and Nancy & Nancy's nephew Newsom, who violates Article 1, Section 2, Clause 4, for 11 months now.

Where's any other American besides me who wants the Constitution enforced, where's the judiciary, where's McCarthy minority leader, ...

5
540k-Again 5 points ago +5 / -0

Come On Man™ Remember, it's Democrats and commies and criminals are pushing for Civil War 2.0 for awhile now. I warned of this years ago on TDspezdit, and laid out everything we needed to do to head them off. We are here in the here and now. The Lefties are the ones who want/need to raise the water temp to boil in order to spread marxism here there and everywhere, as well as war/civil war is part of their greatest transfer of wealth in human history. We can still stop them.

The Marxists spread by conflict, to weaken Patriots & Monarchies

[GEOPOLITICAL Redpill, you can't unsee once you see it.] The goal (by the Dems/globalists/marxists/interventionists) who got the US into Vietnam, was to deplete the US, and our resources, grind up American Patriots & local (Vietnamese) Patriots & monarchy; thus the marxists here in the US and in Vietnam could rise with less competition to power.

Same thing in other countries too, like China in the '40s; WW1, WW2, Post 9/11 etc. All over the map, nearly all wars and major conflicts for 120 years now (including Russia 1917, etc.).

Marxists start crap, escalation, countries fighting over some other pretense with the help of Marxists in power in those countries controlling policy/news/etc. And when a country or monarchy is weakened from war, the other marxists strike either overtly, or Long March through the Institutions; and the map grows in marxism both internationally and WITHIN countries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_long_march_through_the_institutions

  • Marxism (Light) = Socialism

  • Marxism (Medium) = Fascism

  • Marxism (Heavy) = Communism

Marxism is evil in all its forms; and attracts all other evils to it.

Can't give them exactly what they want, that's not winning. The people who are problems, are like criminals(only a few, <3% of population) are real marxists and very few are their mass murdering leaders attracted to marxism as a vehicle to power without checks and balances.

Learn redpills from those of us in the front-line trenches HOLDING THE LINE fighting the corrupt & commies. Learning fast from veterans is time-tested&proven wisdom for green recruits. We know how to stop the Lefties, but we need reinforcements and resupply.... have been and are manning the front line trenches, HOLDING THE LINE against the corrupt & commies, for a LONG time.

In case you want some Front Line insight vs corrupt & commies, rather than incite:

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8urdISD/x/c/1BknrbZLT0

Peace is the Prize. - Quaker Pede

0
zedrexvsyrex 0 points ago +2 / -2

Fascism is not Marxism. It's vehemently anti-Marxist. That's partially why Germany double-crossed Russia in WWII lol

1
540k-Again 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fascism is marxism. Can go read/listen to the Big guy in charge of Italy in the 1930's who "invented" his flavor of marxism, called fascism.

They are like flavors of ice cream; but they are still ice cream. You can argue that vanilla is not chocolate is not strawberry; but it's all flavors of ice cream.

Each "leader" of marxism, takes it and adjusts it to their location (people, culture, business/industry, etc.) to make it so they can take power. Like Gov Gavin Newsom, wouldn't need to "nationalize" Big Tech in Chi-Comm Valley, because they're already controlled by the marxists; but he needs to take over PG&E.

Remember, like most ideologies; the branches/flavors often fight amongst themselves more than they fight "outsiders". Be this Islam; or Christianity for instance as good examples. How many times in history do Protestants v Catholics v Eastern Orthodox v Church of England fight each other over who's the "right" one to carry the title; vs fighting outsiders.

So you can say that Adolf and his pal in Italy were both vehemently anti-Communist; since like all marxist/Lefties they purge out others in their own wing of ideology to control power (there's only room for 1; just like all the others purge out to get power or after getting power... Lenin, Castro, Mao, etc.)

Historical Redpill also: Adolf was going to forceably colonize eastern Europe, with or without Marxism/Communism/Fascism; it was one of his "goals" for a long time, marxism let him achieve power without checks and balances as that is what marxism does.

2
zedrexvsyrex 2 points ago +3 / -1

Okay, I see what you're trying to say, but you're confusing Marxism with socialism. Marxism is a form of socialism; socialism is NOT a form of Marxism. Fascism is a form of socialism that is anti-Marxist; fascism is NOT a form of Marxism.

It would be like confusing a Ford and a car. A Ford is a TYPE of car, but a car is not a type of Ford. Make sense?