Come On Man™ Remember, it's Democrats and commies and criminals are pushing for Civil War 2.0 for awhile now. I warned of this years ago on TDspezdit, and laid out everything we needed to do to head them off. We are here in the here and now. The Lefties are the ones who want/need to raise the water temp to boil in order to spread marxism here there and everywhere, as well as war/civil war is part of their greatest transfer of wealth in human history. We can still stop them.
The Marxists spread by conflict, to weaken Patriots & Monarchies
[GEOPOLITICAL Redpill, you can't unsee once you see it.] The goal (by the Dems/globalists/marxists/interventionists) who got the US into Vietnam, was to deplete the US, and our resources, grind up American Patriots & local (Vietnamese) Patriots & monarchy; thus the marxists here in the US and in Vietnam could rise with less competition to power.
Same thing in other countries too, like China in the '40s; WW1, WW2, Post 9/11 etc. All over the map, nearly all wars and major conflicts for 120 years now (including Russia 1917, etc.).
Marxists start crap, escalation, countries fighting over some other pretense with the help of Marxists in power in those countries controlling policy/news/etc. And when a country or monarchy is weakened from war, the other marxists strike either overtly, or Long March through the Institutions; and the map grows in marxism both internationally and WITHIN countries.
Marxism is evil in all its forms; and attracts all other evils to it.
Can't give them exactly what they want, that's not winning. The people who are problems, are like criminals(only a few, <3% of population) are real marxists and very few are their mass murdering leaders attracted to marxism as a vehicle to power without checks and balances.
Learn redpills from those of us in the front-line trenches HOLDING THE LINE fighting the corrupt & commies. Learning fast from veterans is time-tested&proven wisdom for green recruits. We know how to stop the Lefties, but we need reinforcements and resupply.... have been and are manning the front line trenches, HOLDING THE LINE against the corrupt & commies, for a LONG time.
In case you want some Front Line insight vs corrupt & commies, rather than incite:
Fascism is marxism. Can go read/listen to the Big guy in charge of Italy in the 1930's who "invented" his flavor of marxism, called fascism.
They are like flavors of ice cream; but they are still ice cream. You can argue that vanilla is not chocolate is not strawberry; but it's all flavors of ice cream.
Each "leader" of marxism, takes it and adjusts it to their location (people, culture, business/industry, etc.) to make it so they can take power. Like Gov Gavin Newsom, wouldn't need to "nationalize" Big Tech in Chi-Comm Valley, because they're already controlled by the marxists; but he needs to take over PG&E.
Remember, like most ideologies; the branches/flavors often fight amongst themselves more than they fight "outsiders". Be this Islam; or Christianity for instance as good examples. How many times in history do Protestants v Catholics v Eastern Orthodox v Church of England fight each other over who's the "right" one to carry the title; vs fighting outsiders.
So you can say that Adolf and his pal in Italy were both vehemently anti-Communist; since like all marxist/Lefties they purge out others in their own wing of ideology to control power (there's only room for 1; just like all the others purge out to get power or after getting power... Lenin, Castro, Mao, etc.)
Historical Redpill also: Adolf was going to forceably colonize eastern Europe, with or without Marxism/Communism/Fascism; it was one of his "goals" for a long time, marxism let him achieve power without checks and balances as that is what marxism does.
Okay, I see what you're trying to say, but you're confusing Marxism with socialism. Marxism is a form of socialism; socialism is NOT a form of Marxism. Fascism is a form of socialism that is anti-Marxist; fascism is NOT a form of Marxism.
It would be like confusing a Ford and a car. A Ford is a TYPE of car, but a car is not a type of Ford. Make sense?
On 18 February, Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels gave the famous Sportpalast speech in Berlin, encouraging the Germans to accept a total war that would claim all resources and efforts from the entire population.
Because you see, Germany never was on a "total war" effort/economy. If the German marxists in charge tried forcing even more Marxism, into more heavily to the communism spectrum, they would have lost political power domestically (aka coup, revolt, electoral loss, money/talent exodus, etc.)
So same with socialism, if the leaders in there locations push too hard for more Marxism than politically possible, they lose power.
Come On Man™ Remember, it's Democrats and commies and criminals are pushing for Civil War 2.0 for awhile now. I warned of this years ago on TDspezdit, and laid out everything we needed to do to head them off. We are here in the here and now. The Lefties are the ones who want/need to raise the water temp to boil in order to spread marxism here there and everywhere, as well as war/civil war is part of their greatest transfer of wealth in human history. We can still stop them.
The Marxists spread by conflict, to weaken Patriots & Monarchies
[GEOPOLITICAL Redpill, you can't unsee once you see it.] The goal (by the Dems/globalists/marxists/interventionists) who got the US into Vietnam, was to deplete the US, and our resources, grind up American Patriots & local (Vietnamese) Patriots & monarchy; thus the marxists here in the US and in Vietnam could rise with less competition to power.
Same thing in other countries too, like China in the '40s; WW1, WW2, Post 9/11 etc. All over the map, nearly all wars and major conflicts for 120 years now (including Russia 1917, etc.).
Marxists start crap, escalation, countries fighting over some other pretense with the help of Marxists in power in those countries controlling policy/news/etc. And when a country or monarchy is weakened from war, the other marxists strike either overtly, or Long March through the Institutions; and the map grows in marxism both internationally and WITHIN countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_long_march_through_the_institutions
Marxism (Light) = Socialism
Marxism (Medium) = Fascism
Marxism (Heavy) = Communism
Marxism is evil in all its forms; and attracts all other evils to it.
Can't give them exactly what they want, that's not winning. The people who are problems, are like criminals(only a few, <3% of population) are real marxists and very few are their mass murdering leaders attracted to marxism as a vehicle to power without checks and balances.
Learn redpills from those of us in the front-line trenches HOLDING THE LINE fighting the corrupt & commies. Learning fast from veterans is time-tested&proven wisdom for green recruits. We know how to stop the Lefties, but we need reinforcements and resupply.... have been and are manning the front line trenches, HOLDING THE LINE against the corrupt & commies, for a LONG time.
In case you want some Front Line insight vs corrupt & commies, rather than incite:
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8urdISD/x/c/1BknrbZLT0
Peace is the Prize. - Quaker Pede
Fascism is not Marxism. It's vehemently anti-Marxist. That's partially why Germany double-crossed Russia in WWII lol
Fascism is marxism. Can go read/listen to the Big guy in charge of Italy in the 1930's who "invented" his flavor of marxism, called fascism.
They are like flavors of ice cream; but they are still ice cream. You can argue that vanilla is not chocolate is not strawberry; but it's all flavors of ice cream.
Each "leader" of marxism, takes it and adjusts it to their location (people, culture, business/industry, etc.) to make it so they can take power. Like Gov Gavin Newsom, wouldn't need to "nationalize" Big Tech in Chi-Comm Valley, because they're already controlled by the marxists; but he needs to take over PG&E.
Remember, like most ideologies; the branches/flavors often fight amongst themselves more than they fight "outsiders". Be this Islam; or Christianity for instance as good examples. How many times in history do Protestants v Catholics v Eastern Orthodox v Church of England fight each other over who's the "right" one to carry the title; vs fighting outsiders.
So you can say that Adolf and his pal in Italy were both vehemently anti-Communist; since like all marxist/Lefties they purge out others in their own wing of ideology to control power (there's only room for 1; just like all the others purge out to get power or after getting power... Lenin, Castro, Mao, etc.)
Historical Redpill also: Adolf was going to forceably colonize eastern Europe, with or without Marxism/Communism/Fascism; it was one of his "goals" for a long time, marxism let him achieve power without checks and balances as that is what marxism does.
Okay, I see what you're trying to say, but you're confusing Marxism with socialism. Marxism is a form of socialism; socialism is NOT a form of Marxism. Fascism is a form of socialism that is anti-Marxist; fascism is NOT a form of Marxism.
It would be like confusing a Ford and a car. A Ford is a TYPE of car, but a car is not a type of Ford. Make sense?
Your redpilling journey is underway ;)
Socialism-Fascism-Communism all sprouts from the same evil Marx(& Engels) ideology seed.
The main reality way they differ, is in how much their "leaders/proponents" can push for without losing control or/of political power.
I give this as an example in the spectrum of Marxism:
At the end, the German 6th Army was encircled and lost. The Eastern Front and WW2, (is going in reverse) badly now for Germany.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Stalingrad
Because you see, Germany never was on a "total war" effort/economy. If the German marxists in charge tried forcing even more Marxism, into more heavily to the communism spectrum, they would have lost political power domestically (aka coup, revolt, electoral loss, money/talent exodus, etc.)
So same with socialism, if the leaders in there locations push too hard for more Marxism than politically possible, they lose power.