Hurst didn't even have an OP source, someone pressed him and he had to search to find the original Jon Fredricks report from the 4th. John might have misspoke at the time in the heat of the moment idk:
I was just coming here to post. There’s a little more to the tweet as well, they actually ran it twice and got the same result. I’m hoping this is solid enough for a press release. This coincides with the affidavits from people seeing the votes switch.
Hope they show similar behaviour. Then they should record it how it processes the exact same amount of ballots for Biden/Trump put in and what comes out.
The guy in charge of the county's election is already claiming that, apparently. He insists the CPA must have counted the ballots wrong before feeding them into the machine.
I forgot to mention the election official is a dem, so I can only assume they started screeching that it was debunked before the results even went public.
Would love to see this in AZ especially. I know they have lots of CA transplants but I don't think they have enough to flip it for the astronaut so shitty even other astronauts endorsed his opponent.
This is absolutely huge as written. I would like to see the details of the run if there is anything else to it. Like....how many machine, repeatability, etc.
They had 1 machine sequestered, ran equal number of ballots thru it, half for POTUS half for the pedo. Machine switched 37 of them. They ran it again, it repeated.
Everyone remember tho, it has long been known how easy it is to hack the machines, or even just change settings to where you want them. So unless they have custodial records of who had access to the machine it might not mean anything. Someone 'could' have taken 10 minutes to change settings 1 hour before the test, for all we know.
But their numbers kinda match the base algorithm mentioned in the math analysis posted a while back, showing approx a 1.25 weight for the pedo and a .76 weight for POTUS.
And the ratios can be changed, if I remember correctly.
This is one of those things that's either absolutely true or absolutely false. If absolutely false, it's maliciously created. Which means whoever introduced it needs to be either celebrated or condemned.
They did find an algorithm but the percentage was .26% not 26%.
Some Confirmation from Rep. Jody Hice: https://twitter.com/CongressmanHice/status/1334919630339641345?s=20
Press Release from VoterGA: https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/press-release-dominion-flips-trump-votes-to-biden-in-ga-county.pdf
Hurst didn't even have an OP source, someone pressed him and he had to search to find the original Jon Fredricks report from the 4th. John might have misspoke at the time in the heat of the moment idk:
https://twitter.com/robbhurstCPA/status/1335655112958730249?s=20
Dear God in Heaven. Please let this be true.
This is The Way.
This is The Way.
I don't know, your username makes me think you're full of shit.
The tweet is inaccurate on the math but conceptually correct.
I was just coming here to post. There’s a little more to the tweet as well, they actually ran it twice and got the same result. I’m hoping this is solid enough for a press release. This coincides with the affidavits from people seeing the votes switch.
They will be doing the Atrim County Michigan machines later today.
Hope they show similar behaviour. Then they should record it how it processes the exact same amount of ballots for Biden/Trump put in and what comes out.
Then let that go viral.
I’m surprised they weren’t able to get to the machines and change the algorithm/data before they could test the machine. Glad I was wrong.
If replicable they have to trust the science, right?
It's only science if they agree with it.
Also if it has multiple genders
Nope, they just deboonk. In fact, it's already been deboooooonked!
The guy in charge of the county's election is already claiming that, apparently. He insists the CPA must have counted the ballots wrong before feeding them into the machine.
If there's on thing accountants are good at, it's counting. And they counted twice apparently. I think I'll go with the CPA fella.
I forgot to mention the election official is a dem, so I can only assume they started screeching that it was debunked before the results even went public.
Dems seem pretty bad with numbers. If they had their way, math would be about the feels. The answer to this equation just feels right...
They do say 2+2=5
I am always amazed by how fast some bank tellers can count. Counting is the hardest math for me.
I think they invented other integer math because counting was too hard.
Before long they’ll be predeboonking crimes before we find them
Repeat on senate and house races, in fact all down ballot races.
Would love to see this in AZ especially. I know they have lots of CA transplants but I don't think they have enough to flip it for the astronaut so shitty even other astronauts endorsed his opponent.
This is absolutely huge as written. I would like to see the details of the run if there is anything else to it. Like....how many machine, repeatability, etc.
They had 1 machine sequestered, ran equal number of ballots thru it, half for POTUS half for the pedo. Machine switched 37 of them. They ran it again, it repeated.
Everyone remember tho, it has long been known how easy it is to hack the machines, or even just change settings to where you want them. So unless they have custodial records of who had access to the machine it might not mean anything. Someone 'could' have taken 10 minutes to change settings 1 hour before the test, for all we know.
But their numbers kinda match the base algorithm mentioned in the math analysis posted a while back, showing approx a 1.25 weight for the pedo and a .76 weight for POTUS.
And the ratios can be changed, if I remember correctly.
https://kekpe.pe/i/5fcc0ebf2a6f6.jpeg
You cannot trust it, obviously.
The software is explained in here a little bit.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.azd.1255923/gov.uscourts.azd.1255923.1.5.pdf
This is gonna blow like Krakatoa when it does finally hit the public. That is, IF people will bother to understand it all.
https://kekpe.pe/i/5fcd21d5cdcfb.jpeg
You're right. Such a feature should be disabled before put into production.
There shouldn’t BE any production of those internal machines!!
You say internal, I say infernal.
Lmao, machines from hell is right
Username checks out.
True. Until we get to some kind of system where fraud is impossible, we need to stick with paper.
The feature shouldnt even be there to begin with.
Yeah, it's insane that it even exists. How about a calculator that gives totals that exceed the actual sum? What a great idea!
lol why is the feature even there? It only has one job, count votes.
The fact that this is proveably possible means the entire election can't be trusted and must be redone with paper.
The day of the rope has arrived
Lol. I was like, did someone forget to post
Deboonked.
Do I have too? Someone does. No matter how lame it is. And there you are Skippy, there you are.
Thank you for doing what’s right. It’s not easy.
YUGE
It was 0.26% not 0.25%
35,500 Pop of Ware County. 37 ballot shift to Biden from Trump when run through the machine is reported as 0.26%. That means 14,231 votes total.
STOP POSTING THIS SHIT. YOU ARE WRONG
It was off a sample of a 100 votes. 26% is correct I believe
Q Bombs lol...
Sorry not believing this one until Trump team supports it
N word Lin Woods is the trump team. Where have you been?
Lin is independent. He's not on Trump's team. That would be Jenna and Rudy.
Neither are Sidney or Flynn. But still, all are very MAGA.
Officially, yes.
Lol.....no. Lincoln Wood is a lawyer representing We the People. He has no association with Q not theTrump Legal Team.
He retweeted it and one of the sources was a user named Q bomb looknat his screenshot jfc
Sid's team is responsible for this.
Georgia GOP representative confirmed it. Check the thread of the original tweet,
Huh?
Source: https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/press-release-dominion-flips-trump-votes-to-biden-in-ga-county.pdf
https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/press-release-dominion-flips-trump-votes-to-biden-in-ga-county.pdf
This is one of those things that's either absolutely true or absolutely false. If absolutely false, it's maliciously created. Which means whoever introduced it needs to be either celebrated or condemned.
T h i s i s T h e W a y
Show me a video so I can share it!!!
https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/11/ware-county-confirmation.jpg
This is GG if true - but why didn't the discrepancies show in the hand recount?
It was 37 votes, or 0.26% as originally reported. Not 26% of votes. Ware has 35k+ people.
I dont think you read that properly fren.
they ran an equal number of trump and biden votes and thats when they saw this shift in plain sight. they did it twice in fact.
I read it properly. That is old news.
Go back to the original report.
I post the numbers above.
So is there a threshold for changing votes😵
35,500 Pop of Ware County. 37 ballot shift to Biden from Trump when run through the machine is reported as 0.26%. That means 14,231 votes total.
SHILL
I don’t know if this a different scenario or not but this was testing with equal number of Biden to Trump votes