693
Comments (46)
sorted by:
16
beholdachair 16 points ago +20 / -4

0.26%, not 26%, or 14,000 votes when extrapolated to all of Georgia. That's without the physical ballot stuffing.

That # from the original report. Which by now, this news is several days old.

How anyone gets 37 votes = 26%, out of Ware County's 35,500 inhabitants is anyone's guess. CPA that better not be doing my books!

19
modded 19 points ago +19 / -0

Exactly. The point isn't the amount anyway, its the fact that votes can be switched.

1
beholdachair 1 point ago +1 / -0

I say 'you're right', but add 'it is an important point that they wouldn't be stupid enough to try to swing the percentages that much with software alone'.

14
BloodDe 14 points ago +14 / -0

I read on another thread they got a result out of 100 equal votes Biden/Trump that 87 went to Trump and 113 went to Biden. The difference being 26%.

1
beholdachair 1 point ago +1 / -0

You did reeeed that (damn english).

But they were wrong.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-wBJsqMVuI

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
Regeneron2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah I thought so. With 26% fraud would be way too obvious. 0.26% is yuge in the key states though.

6
10_for_the_big_man 6 points ago +6 / -0

Vote totals GA per Decision Desk HQ:

2,474,601 Biden

2,461,965 Trump

62,141 3rd party

4,998,707 Total votes.

.26% of total votes (0.0026 x 4,998,707) automatically given to Biden = 12,997 votes. (Note: Biden's lead in GA = 12,645)

5
turdinthepunch 5 points ago +5 / -0

.26% or 26% doesn't matter. Joe Biden should not be getting weighted votes and a handicap anywhere. We have no way of knowing if any of the other machines were weighting votes the same. This is just proof the whole fucking thing is compromised and a disaster.

1
beholdachair 1 point ago +1 / -0

It matters because 0.26% shows slight of hand. Much more believable. Intent, much?

11
keeponwinning 11 points ago +11 / -0

The tweet accidentally a decimal from the original pdf.

9
DamSon 9 points ago +9 / -0

"I accidentally the whole urinal cake. What should I do?"

7
OrangeElvis 7 points ago +7 / -0

No offense, but we have HAD evidence. This may be harder, less "circumstantial" but there is already mountains of it.

7
cryogen 7 points ago +7 / -0

Holy shit. If that's true it would match Solomon's findings, right...?

1
HowardRoark 1 point ago +1 / -0

Praise the word of Solomon 🙌

1
Rustbeltkulak 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think we'd need exact precinct numbers to see if this machine was present at a precinct Solomon determined to be "seized" at any point in time on election night to say it "matches" or corroborates anything in Solomon's work.

What I am saying is, this may be separate, independent evidence from what Solomon has done, and that is fine too. It doesn't need to be a part of what he has uncovered, but if it is great. We just do not know that yet b/c we'd need precinct information regarding this machine to make that connection.

4
Rusty50cal 4 points ago +4 / -0

Game on!

4
usmcphrog46 4 points ago +4 / -0

The video was the dam breaking, now there is nothing they can do to stop the flow of Truth.

2
Tenspot20 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is where the criminals start to run right.

Like in the OJ murder fiasco with the White Bronco and all of the cops chasing?

2
beholdachair 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which was to distract while his son got a lawyer. Already having been locked up for being a psychopath that brutalized a woman. Go look it up.

The glove fit his son. OT: and OJ was scratched up because he arrived and had to handle his son.

4
Magamom 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pls help moms like me to understand - does this mean regardless of the number of ballots entered, it always showed a 26% lead for Biden?

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
Magamom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
beholdachair 1 point ago +1 / -0

0.26% of the votes switched. The number was given as 37. 37 taken from Trump and given to Biden.

First, I looked at the population of Ware. ~35,500. Then, since y / x = %, where y is 37, and % is 0.26 (0.0026), I took 37/0.0026 = 14,230 voters, a reasonable number compared with the total population.

I read the paper posted above by a pede replying, since revisiting this thread and many others where i dropped the crumb of "0.26 not 26%" and see it wasn't for waste. OANN covered this exact topic, citing this line of threads/tweets!

Revisiting: Listening skills. Not everyone uses them. He said 'after the manual recount', not 'a sample of 100 manually-counted votes'. Which means after a manual recount of the entire county, 37 votes were flipped. That extrapolated to 14,000 votes for all of Georgia, where the margin was 10,000 (without ballot stuffing and other immoral/illegal/unlawful measures).

We must consider that their fraud is to make it appear 'close'.

4
Proud_American 4 points ago +5 / -1

Without proof of this test we have no idea if it’s even true, but it’s not unlikely.

The issue is .26% is the actual difference. Not 26%. Still, extrapolated across the entire number of votes, it’s thousands of votes flipped. Despite whether it’s enough to flip the election, even one vote flipped is grounds for war.

1
MattWoodPA [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

we will know more as this develops but accord to the tweet when they ran a stack of ballots with equal votes for trump as biden in stack ..machine will say biden has more...how much there is some confusion around atm ..but regardless of how much it proves dominion machines have some algorithmic input somehow.

3
10gauge 3 points ago +3 / -0

HUGE

2
ComputerGuru 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t understand where you are getting 0.26%. If they ran 100 ballots for Biden and he had a 26% lead as the tweet indicates, then he would have 126 votes. The tweet does mention whether or not trump then had a deficit of votes to make up for Biden’s magic ballots. So it would be 26% or a multiplier of 0.26 added to Biden’s totals.

2
beholdachair 2 points ago +2 / -0

read the original report from the guy who wrote it. It's linked on this page, from another pede.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
barefootozark 2 points ago +2 / -0

If 37 of 14,192 total votes in Ware County were switched, that is 0.2607% of total votes were switched.

Georgia has a total of 4,935,486 votes, and Biden leads by 11,928.

0.2607% of 4,935,486 is 12,867 votes. 0.26% is more than the margin that Biden leads.

1
beholdachair 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes. Someone that does the math themselves to check the numbers. Let alone listening to the initial report.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
master_kek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Always has been

1
AmericaFirstMAGA88 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anywhere dominion or smartmatic was used needs to be tossed out

1
Donal 1 point ago +1 / -0

I couldn't follow the Edward Solomon stuff can anyone comment on if his analysis would correspond to this?

EDIT this is what I'm talking about if people haven't seen it. https://rumble.com/vbmho1-laymans-explanation-of-the-wheel..html

EDIT 2: Full video https://rumble.com/vblspz-smoking-gun-part-2-ratio-transfers-proved-entire-algorithm-reversed-net-200.html

2
Rustbeltkulak 2 points ago +2 / -0

I followed Solomon's analysis pretty well. I do not, however, know the precinct numbers in GA by heart such that I could match them to their home county. Nor does this report cite exact precinct numbers for where these ballots were originally counted; it is just reporting that the machine produces inaccurate results. It doesn't need to do more than just that to prove the unreliability of the results on election night.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
BidensPoopyUnderwear 1 point ago +1 / -0

And this is probably after the vendor reflashed the unit back.

1
GoingCamaro 1 point ago +1 / -0

DISPOOTED!!!! DISPOOTED!!! DISPOOTED!!!

1
Tenspot20 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Hey Dad, Is it The Season of Christmas Treason yet?"

"Yes Boy, Now put the Holy Star on top of the decorated Tree, Son."

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3