Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
That's her. Same face, same hair, same stupid look, same lanyard
I'm just going to keep saying I don't see it. The nose bridge isn't the same, and the eye shape isn't the same. The woman on the right has a nose bridge that extends all the way to her eyebrows. The woman on the left has a nose bridge that has been shaved down, or is sunken in and stops at her tear ducts.
I'm sorry guys, but this feels like a huge distraction. We can all think she's stupid and agree she said some dumb shit, but I don't see this.
Don't listen to this dumbass. He's literally a shill in disguise only has been posting here for 3 days when the tables turned. What are the chances of both women looking exactly the same. These videos can be months about due to early voting. You're as indenial as she was!
Shill? what does me doing research have to do with Shilling, you haven't even posted any original material to this site so maybe you're the fucking shill. Where's your research other than using two images and comparing hair. You're fucking useless to the improvement of this site. Send me a message when you Drop some content Retard
Don't think it's her. Different hairline. Woman on right looks older. Eyebrows look different. This is wishful thinking. This is not enough to convince me.
Eye measurement compared to nose structure. Facial recog. sw can easily reconstruct her entire face from those three points and give an approximation as to what her mouth and jawline look like.
This needs to investigated IMMEDIATELY! I'm sure Rudy would love to prosecute this woman if this is her. I didn't think it was at first, but now, eh, it's possible.
Hairgate: how much time has passed between the photo on the right and left? Here highlights (if this is the same person) have grown out since the counting photo. You could do a rate of growth study on the hair and match it up that way.
The American Academy of Dermatology says that hair grows about 1/2 inch per month on average. That’s a grand total of about 6 inches per year for the hair on your head.
It this is a 30 day spread it seems like not enough time for her hair to grow out as much as pictured.
Exactly, that's why I've been pushing back on it also. Just saw where Sidney retweeted a tweet about it, and I think she jumped the gun on it. In the original tweet, that person later said she wasn't sure because of the PA photo.
Women do makeup on the eyebrows, could be that... Almost everything else seems to match up. Not 100% on board, just saying eyebrows isn't that much of a deal breaker.
The pic on the right was one month before the one on the left. The argument is not about hair thickness, but rather if the roots could fix in that amount of time.
In the face on the left she is raising her eyebrows as if surprised or expecting something. We would need a different left picture where she is relaxed
Fuck. I gotta take my downvotes like a man. Woman on the right has a different hairline and does that eyebrow thing my mom and wife do where it's super thin. Eye shape is also different.
So... go ahead. I see the downvotes coming. I can take it.
We’re talking about the roots. Look at the brown color. It has shifted about 4 inches between this photos. I’m not a chick but I don’t think hair dye grows out that quickly.
It's quite possible that Dem Officials may go in other state at polling booth to avoid limelight. They are at it. Coordinate Con-Job Right from Top to Bottom. Check their Accounts. CCP Money
I know I'm in the minority here but I don't think its the same woman. The hair is wrong, so are her eye brows and eyes themselves. The woman on the left has far deeper set eyes. I'm also not convinced that the bracelet is the same either, too far to see.
It really doesn't matter, there is SO much better evidence than this. Chasing everything like this takes away from the better evidence and allows for the left to distract with it. When we chase things like this, it's very similar to how the left acted for 4 years accusing Trump of EVERYTHING and eventually people just started rolling their eyes and saying "there they go again"
is it me or would it not make ethical or legal sense to allow seated officials to count ballots? I would assume such a thing would be conflict of interest and against the law.
That’s it. That’s all there is to this. It’s her. At first I was like, eh maybe. The look of fear recognizing she was being photographed at the polling site and this is it.
U see those piles of votes???i was recieving the same kinda USPS war material at the sky harbor airport at UPS as an employee oct 28,29,30th! I counted more than 72 trays of pristine mail in ballots!
That's pretty weak. The Chans usually run full, facial recognition sw.
That's her. Same face, same hair, same stupid look, same lanyard, same bracelet, in a polling place. That's her.
Oh, I agree. Just saying the Chans usually go the extra mile when pinning down one of these soon-to-be-shitting-their-pants commies.
knowing 4chan, 90% of the evidence came from matching what color panties she was wearing
I'm just going to keep saying I don't see it. The nose bridge isn't the same, and the eye shape isn't the same. The woman on the right has a nose bridge that extends all the way to her eyebrows. The woman on the left has a nose bridge that has been shaved down, or is sunken in and stops at her tear ducts.
I'm sorry guys, but this feels like a huge distraction. We can all think she's stupid and agree she said some dumb shit, but I don't see this.
Her eyebrows are fully up in the first picture son And relaxed in the second
You sir just got deboooooooooonked
its called makeup, its why hollowood types and models and such often look 100 times better then they do when they are photographed in the wild :P
I completely agree, even the hair is different. You can see roots on the lady to the left.
It is a touch call. Hair part, blonde highlights, neck connective tissues, skin, and body type look identical.
Brow and nose area, and her hairline seem a bit off. But I know changing your facial expression can move those things around.
Same mask too.
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlKUx3n3/for-all-the-people-who-downvoted/
Don't listen to this dumbass. He's literally a shill in disguise only has been posting here for 3 days when the tables turned. What are the chances of both women looking exactly the same. These videos can be months about due to early voting. You're as indenial as she was!
That dumbass is the same one who commented
Shill? what does me doing research have to do with Shilling, you haven't even posted any original material to this site so maybe you're the fucking shill. Where's your research other than using two images and comparing hair. You're fucking useless to the improvement of this site. Send me a message when you Drop some content Retard
Well the chances are zero because they don't look the same.
Don't think it's her. Different hairline. Woman on right looks older. Eyebrows look different. This is wishful thinking. This is not enough to convince me.
amazing how gullible people on here can be. The lady on the right even has roots from having her hair lightened.
Just because I disagree doesn't mean I'm a shill bud. This pic is close, but still not enough to be convincing to me.
its even different hair colors, the woman on the right CLEARLY lightens her hair.... SEE THE FUCKING roots you blind fool.
Oh, they are identical. Just saying the usual Chansuspects would have DNA by now.
I am facial recognition software!!
Chan would enhance the photos until it could see her dna and compare it that way.
She's wearing a mask. Facial recognition wouldn't work.
Eye measurement compared to nose structure. Facial recog. sw can easily reconstruct her entire face from those three points and give an approximation as to what her mouth and jawline look like.
Planned Parent Hood
This needs to investigated IMMEDIATELY! I'm sure Rudy would love to prosecute this woman if this is her. I didn't think it was at first, but now, eh, it's possible.
"That's the same picture."
haha, I called this yesterday! Nailed it!
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlKRXbJS/x/c/4Dqc4tw3RCx?d=50
Haha, good eye, Pede!
Hair roots could be because it's a full month later almost, but that is a lot of hair growth on a month though.
Hairgate: how much time has passed between the photo on the right and left? Here highlights (if this is the same person) have grown out since the counting photo. You could do a rate of growth study on the hair and match it up that way.
It this is a 30 day spread it seems like not enough time for her hair to grow out as much as pictured.
You have it backwards.
Could be the lighting, but I don't think it's the same person. Parent's blonde highlights don't come up as high and the bridge of her nose is flatter.
Check the eyebrows there Sherlock
Thank you! The confirmation bias on this on is off the charts. Its not her and this is gonna make us look bad.
Exactly, that's why I've been pushing back on it also. Just saw where Sidney retweeted a tweet about it, and I think she jumped the gun on it. In the original tweet, that person later said she wasn't sure because of the PA photo.
😁
Women do makeup on the eyebrows, could be that... Almost everything else seems to match up. Not 100% on board, just saying eyebrows isn't that much of a deal breaker.
Fuck yes finally someone else sees it updoots for you pede
You really are bored aren’t you?
Brown hair for roots, didn’t grow out that fast. Mabye chain her hair slightly but still the same ??
Hoping it is tho
Don't forget there was early voting. As a female, I can say those roots can grow out in 2-3 weeks
Yep this picture was a month ago.
If someone grew that much hair each month, they could make a fuck load of money donating as that is a freakish amount.
The pic on the right was one month before the one on the left. The argument is not about hair thickness, but rather if the roots could fix in that amount of time.
You have the pictures backwards.
Circle the eyebrows and you'll see its likely not the same person.
In the face on the left she is raising her eyebrows as if surprised or expecting something. We would need a different left picture where she is relaxed
What about the bird beak nose on the ballot counter and the flatter nose at the hearing?
Next stop checking whether she has ever worn that same shirt in public that we can match with, then we call in the air strike.
Fuck. I gotta take my downvotes like a man. Woman on the right has a different hairline and does that eyebrow thing my mom and wife do where it's super thin. Eye shape is also different.
So... go ahead. I see the downvotes coming. I can take it.
You have it backwards; she had a haircut.
We’re talking about the roots. Look at the brown color. It has shifted about 4 inches between this photos. I’m not a chick but I don’t think hair dye grows out that quickly.
Forehead height also seems different.
Women are saying 2-3 weeks for this much of a shift. There is at least a month time gap between the two photos.
That coloring is in style right now, could easily be deliberate.
That coloring is in style right now, could easily be deliberate.
Why is that relevant? There is not enough quality in these images to be that precise with the color.
I can show you two pictures of Trump where he has completely different skin color. That doesn't mean they are two different people.
It's quite possible that Dem Officials may go in other state at polling booth to avoid limelight. They are at it. Coordinate Con-Job Right from Top to Bottom. Check their Accounts. CCP Money
Is that Ms Deboonked?
Amazing how human instinct causes the guilty to look right into the eye of the camera
Some sjw pede in another thread was whining about how inaccurate the Karen stereotype is... and look at this woman. She’s a total Karen.
What ballot room is she in?
Security cam
I know I'm in the minority here but I don't think its the same woman. The hair is wrong, so are her eye brows and eyes themselves. The woman on the left has far deeper set eyes. I'm also not convinced that the bracelet is the same either, too far to see.
It really doesn't matter, there is SO much better evidence than this. Chasing everything like this takes away from the better evidence and allows for the left to distract with it. When we chase things like this, it's very similar to how the left acted for 4 years accusing Trump of EVERYTHING and eventually people just started rolling their eyes and saying "there they go again"
It is her, just need to find corroborating data points
Don't they log persons entering the counting centers. I mean, come on. That is basic security 101.
such a shame she didnt have some unique political activist mask.
The fat arms match as well.
You have to solve the issue that the vote counting footage is something the AP is claiming took place in Pittsburgh, PA first.
https://youtu.be/eit_vf2Tq8Q
The one on lefts the OTHER chick in the rt hand picture. Theyre a team fools!
is it me or would it not make ethical or legal sense to allow seated officials to count ballots? I would assume such a thing would be conflict of interest and against the law.
Look at "A" and "B".
I still don't think its her. The eyes/brows are different.
Rook to B4. Check.
Tracy Beanz said on Twitter she is looking into wether that pick was reall from PA, since the AP sometimes mislabels images.
2 Women, that similar, even in detail? Would be one hell of a coincidence.
Also, her part is the same. Hairline is the same too.
That’s it. That’s all there is to this. It’s her. At first I was like, eh maybe. The look of fear recognizing she was being photographed at the polling site and this is it.
Still on the fence on this. Did she comment either way?
Now we know why they wanted us to wear masks, so people won't be able to easily recognize them committing fraud.
These cheating demorats are NOT smart...
lol
That 2nd pic is like a deer in the headlights. She looks so damn funny
U see those piles of votes???i was recieving the same kinda USPS war material at the sky harbor airport at UPS as an employee oct 28,29,30th! I counted more than 72 trays of pristine mail in ballots!
“The hacker 4chan” strikes again 😂!