Copying what another pede said in a different thread.
TalmudIsToiletPaper 14 points 4 hours ago +21 / -7
Hijack for visibility:
Pedes, Former Law Enforcement. That's not Elena Parent in the Election Photo.
Observations:
The arms are too fat on the woman in the Election Photo, you can make comparisons to the arm structure here, although it is an older photo, it shows an Ecto-Mesomorph Bodytype, whereas the woman in the film/photo is a Meso-Endomorph, leaning Endomorph: https://www.thecrier.net/image_6a7f9944-a835-11e0-832d-001cc4c002e0.html Elena did not lose 20-30 lbs between Election Day, and change scientific body types, before her presence at the hearings. In fact, Elena's weight appears consistent over the past number of years, and her arms are relatively toned, as she is naturally an Ecto-Mesomorph.
Elena Parent has a natural irregular curl pattern to her hair, damage from peroxide bleach, on 2/3 of her length, and a persistent flare outward at the shoulder level, existing across numerous photos. Her hair ends in more stressed/ damaged hair and split ends. She does not have a taper, and shows no apparent layers. She's a Mom, and a "Career Gal", her hair is not a primary concern, it's secondary. (Your hair looks like shit Elena)
If you examine Elena's facial structure, the orbital sockets, brow ridge, and high angular cheek bones, create in combination a rectangular or squaring effect of her eyebrows, and the area around her eyes. This is consistent with the angular squaring of her jawbone, giving her more of a squared/ box angular face over all. Her eyes are set more deeply into this bone/facial structure than the woman in the Election Photo. Elena's facial structure is very distinct.
The woman in the Election Photo is heavier set than Elena, the arms and midsection do not match in that she is significantly heavier. The woman in the Election photo also has a more rounded facial structure on the edges around the eyes and cheek bones, lacking the same boxing of the orbital/brow structure, and also demonstrating a larger forehead. The woman in the Election Photo and film also has more of a peaked arch at the apex of her larger forehead at the hairline. This is distinctly different than Elena Parent.
The woman in the photo has naturally straighter hair, and has layered hair, demonstrating a tapered cut, which hangs more inwardly curling, which is opposite of Elena's natural flare outward. This hair is clearly thicker, and longer than Elena Parent's hair, and is clearly lacking the split ends/ frazzled/ damaged look.
Both women appear Caucasian and of Central/ Northern European Ancestry. Both are natural brunettes, who use hair bleach and dye. Facial recognition software would fail to confirm they are the same woman easily. Anyone who says they've used software successfully to create probability match is being dishonest. Any other trained observer/ investigator should also be able to make the same confirmations of difference between the two women.
Don't get trapped in this rabbit hole, or promote it. It's a distraction, and it makes us look bad, discrediting our Group Source/ Group Intelligence Capabilities. We're far better at analysis than this.
I'm not totally convinced it's her but it could be. Any woman knows that how the hair appears is down to the equipment used. My hair tends to curl outward a few inches past my ears on the top layer, so I use a hot brush to make it curve inward in a sweep like hers. She may well have taken more time to groom at the ballot counting but not at the hearings so looked more unkempt. (I'd have thought it would be the other way round but maybe she was too anxious to worry about doing her hair.) Also a leave-in conditioner would make the hair appear smoother and less the frizz and split ends.
The fact ballot counter looks fatter also might not be an issue. I don't know how high the heating is in that place but if she knew it wasn't going to be warm enough for her if she is gonna be counting all day she may have a sweater on underneath to keep the chill off.
Is it her? No clue, but the hair and weight issues people are using to say it couldn't be her, wouldn't convince me it's not.
What was it Mr. Rogers said? "In times of trouble, look for the helpers kneelers. You'll probably find the FBI kneeling at the feet of some random blm enthusiast. In Georgia, they're probably kneeling in front of Stacy Abrams, as she blocks out the Sun.
You are seeing what you want to see. Two bottle-blondes with typical builds and posture, and with MASKS on. Get over it. The bracelet is literally about ten pixels. Anyone who claims they can tell it’s the same bracelet is lying to themselves.
What's up with everyone stating an opinion as fact, and telling others to get over it? It might be her, it might not. Let's just find some better images or video.
I'm not convinced, but I'm interested in the boob analysis.
We need a full anatomical analysis.
Copying what another pede said in a different thread.
TalmudIsToiletPaper 14 points 4 hours ago +21 / -7 Hijack for visibility:
Pedes, Former Law Enforcement. That's not Elena Parent in the Election Photo.
Observations:
The arms are too fat on the woman in the Election Photo, you can make comparisons to the arm structure here, although it is an older photo, it shows an Ecto-Mesomorph Bodytype, whereas the woman in the film/photo is a Meso-Endomorph, leaning Endomorph: https://www.thecrier.net/image_6a7f9944-a835-11e0-832d-001cc4c002e0.html Elena did not lose 20-30 lbs between Election Day, and change scientific body types, before her presence at the hearings. In fact, Elena's weight appears consistent over the past number of years, and her arms are relatively toned, as she is naturally an Ecto-Mesomorph.
Further side profile image analysis: https://i.maga.host/FWv0aHC.png
Elena Parent has a natural irregular curl pattern to her hair, damage from peroxide bleach, on 2/3 of her length, and a persistent flare outward at the shoulder level, existing across numerous photos. Her hair ends in more stressed/ damaged hair and split ends. She does not have a taper, and shows no apparent layers. She's a Mom, and a "Career Gal", her hair is not a primary concern, it's secondary. (Your hair looks like shit Elena)
If you examine Elena's facial structure, the orbital sockets, brow ridge, and high angular cheek bones, create in combination a rectangular or squaring effect of her eyebrows, and the area around her eyes. This is consistent with the angular squaring of her jawbone, giving her more of a squared/ box angular face over all. Her eyes are set more deeply into this bone/facial structure than the woman in the Election Photo. Elena's facial structure is very distinct.
The woman in the Election Photo is heavier set than Elena, the arms and midsection do not match in that she is significantly heavier. The woman in the Election photo also has a more rounded facial structure on the edges around the eyes and cheek bones, lacking the same boxing of the orbital/brow structure, and also demonstrating a larger forehead. The woman in the Election Photo and film also has more of a peaked arch at the apex of her larger forehead at the hairline. This is distinctly different than Elena Parent.
The woman in the photo has naturally straighter hair, and has layered hair, demonstrating a tapered cut, which hangs more inwardly curling, which is opposite of Elena's natural flare outward. This hair is clearly thicker, and longer than Elena Parent's hair, and is clearly lacking the split ends/ frazzled/ damaged look.
Both women appear Caucasian and of Central/ Northern European Ancestry. Both are natural brunettes, who use hair bleach and dye. Facial recognition software would fail to confirm they are the same woman easily. Anyone who says they've used software successfully to create probability match is being dishonest. Any other trained observer/ investigator should also be able to make the same confirmations of difference between the two women.
Don't get trapped in this rabbit hole, or promote it. It's a distraction, and it makes us look bad, discrediting our Group Source/ Group Intelligence Capabilities. We're far better at analysis than this.
I'm not totally convinced it's her but it could be. Any woman knows that how the hair appears is down to the equipment used. My hair tends to curl outward a few inches past my ears on the top layer, so I use a hot brush to make it curve inward in a sweep like hers. She may well have taken more time to groom at the ballot counting but not at the hearings so looked more unkempt. (I'd have thought it would be the other way round but maybe she was too anxious to worry about doing her hair.) Also a leave-in conditioner would make the hair appear smoother and less the frizz and split ends.
The fact ballot counter looks fatter also might not be an issue. I don't know how high the heating is in that place but if she knew it wasn't going to be warm enough for her if she is gonna be counting all day she may have a sweater on underneath to keep the chill off.
Is it her? No clue, but the hair and weight issues people are using to say it couldn't be her, wouldn't convince me it's not.
And eyebrow stuff too
Interstate means FBI. SO let's check out the local doughnut shop and see if we can find anyone that looks like Joe Friday.
What was it Mr. Rogers said? "In times of trouble, look for the
helperskneelers. You'll probably find the FBI kneeling at the feet of some random blm enthusiast. In Georgia, they're probably kneeling in front of Stacy Abrams, as she blocks out the Sun.It's even the same masks...
You can tell by their shifty eyes.
Didn’t know about the pregnancy. That’s is interesting, explains the body type mismatch
This has nothing to do with their vaginas, why would you bring that up???
Why would they go to a state like 800 miles away to count ballots?
Ah, the old boob evidence approach--same one used by Howard Hughes to defend The Outlaw.
You are seeing what you want to see. Two bottle-blondes with typical builds and posture, and with MASKS on. Get over it. The bracelet is literally about ten pixels. Anyone who claims they can tell it’s the same bracelet is lying to themselves.
What's up with everyone stating an opinion as fact, and telling others to get over it? It might be her, it might not. Let's just find some better images or video.
When they do that, your shill sense should tingle.
Interesting way to tell that someone us ugly.
It's not her, get over it.
It's clearly not, go back to 4chan with this dumb shit, and your mouthy little self. We're adults here.
I'm thinking its the same 2 broads, but time will tell.
Hi shill!