So I have had this idea bouncing around in my head for a while now and I would like to share it. I don't have proof, but I present it as an avenue to explore. If it can be disproven or at least made to appear unlikely, I would welcome the help in getting it out of my head... What if, within the last few years, a virus was discovered that was prevalent in humans but did not cause disease. Our bodies would easily fight it off, but for whatever reason (like it affected cats, dogs etc.), we are constantly exposed so a high percentage of people would test positive at any given time, but would be otherwise asymptomatic. Now let's say that information was weaponized. When the flu season started, when people felt ill, instead of testing for the flu they would test for this. Of course it was found and after an overwhelming number of like reports, the statement could be made that this disease was causing it. It would be like testing for red blood cells. Anyway I'm sure you can fill in how we got to where we are now yourselves. Or tell me how far off track I am. Thanks!