7586
Alito Moves Up Deadline For Supreme Court Briefing In Pennsylvania Case, Bringing Within 'Safe Harbor' Window To Intervene (www.zerohedge.com) 🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
posted ago by Scolopendra ago by Scolopendra +7587 / -1
493 comments
493 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (493)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 127 ▼
– LibertarianWalkz 127 points ago +130 / -3

Can anyone explain what this means?

Is the needle finally moving?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– you_can_do_it 7 points ago +8 / -1

Legal deadlines moved up with the reasoning of that if they need to take on the case they would need as much time as possible to hear it and still have time to act. A good (but not concrete) sign that the court is not outright against hearing the case.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Helicopter_Latino 10 points ago +11 / -1

I'm about 90 % sure SCOTUS knows this was an unconstitutional issue. However, I'm worried about the remedy. Best case I see is that they demand the legislature implement a remedy. Worst case , they acknowledge it but cuck out because it would "disenfranchise" citizens who didnt know any better. However, the counter would be that local citizens who went in person were disenfranchised by being treated differently.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TheyEatTheirOwnLies 8 points ago +9 / -1

Disenfranchisement is a non-issue, because either ruling disenfranchises million of people, this is not a simple case that can be thrown out with rhetorical devices.

permalink parent save report block reply