I can't follow your reasoning. Why does the CDC selecting a study make it the "gold standard"? I'll admit that I only skimmed their selections but did not see anything particularly persuasive. No RCT studies in that list (because every RCT study spanning back to 1980 has shown the opposite of the CDC's position).
Oh, I was being snarky. I believe their rationale for an insane policy position should be some quality gold standard studies. If they don't offer that as their rationale, then it's on them.
I can't follow your reasoning. Why does the CDC selecting a study make it the "gold standard"? I'll admit that I only skimmed their selections but did not see anything particularly persuasive. No RCT studies in that list (because every RCT study spanning back to 1980 has shown the opposite of the CDC's position).
Oh, I was being snarky. I believe their rationale for an insane policy position should be some quality gold standard studies. If they don't offer that as their rationale, then it's on them.