113 () posted 131 days ago by lifeofdhamma 131 days ago by lifeofdhamma +113 / -0 11 comments share 11 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (11) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 7 ▼ – half-blacktrump 7 points 131 days ago +7 / -0 I wonder how they'll lose them? permalink save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – terablelizard 5 points 131 days ago +5 / -0 FBI faintly helping? permalink save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – deleted 5 points 131 days ago +5 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – FollowTheLight 3 points 131 days ago +3 / -0 Could various satellite offices of the FBI be okay? Who is Elliot Kerwin? What does any of this mean...my head is rotating faster than Linda Blairs...if I start vomiting pea soup it's game over! permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – yanksali 3 points 131 days ago +3 / -0 Is FIB destroying evidence of their own complicity in stealing an election? permalink save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – itsokaytobereggie 0 points 131 days ago +1 / -1 Time to sic CJ on Officer Tenpenny. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 131 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – Scotty1954 1 point 131 days ago +1 / -0 Read the Forbes story. This is the FBI doing the county's bidding. This is NOT a pro-Trump thing .... probably the opposite. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – becky21k 1 point 131 days ago +1 / -0 Chinese interests own Forbes now, do they not? permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – yanksali 1 point 131 days ago +1 / -0 At one time when there was trust, this would be seen as good news. permalink save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – deleted 0 points 131 days ago +1 / -1
I wonder how they'll lose them?
FBI faintly helping?
Could various satellite offices of the FBI be okay? Who is Elliot Kerwin? What does any of this mean...my head is rotating faster than Linda Blairs...if I start vomiting pea soup it's game over!
Is FIB destroying evidence of their own complicity in stealing an election?
Time to sic CJ on Officer Tenpenny.
Read the Forbes story. This is the FBI doing the county's bidding. This is NOT a pro-Trump thing .... probably the opposite.
Chinese interests own Forbes now, do they not?
At one time when there was trust, this would be seen as good news.