Yeah I take your point but I can't point to any substantive precedent to think Barr is doing anything. There has been no action on anything from Barr. Nothing on Hilary's emails, nothing on unmasking private citizens, nothing on spying on the Trump campaign, nothing on spying on the Trump administration, nothing on the FBI falsifying evidence against Flynn, and I probably missed a few things.
My take is: why would the media need to keep pumping out fake headlines about Barr and Durham if there was nothing? As recent as this morning. "NYT Barr is stepping down!" .... 2 hours later, "DOJ tells CBS Barr intends to stay in as long as Trump needs him.
Yeah I take your point but I can't point to any substantive precedent to think Barr is doing anything. There has been no action on anything from Barr. Nothing on Hilary's emails, nothing on unmasking private citizens, nothing on spying on the Trump campaign, nothing on spying on the Trump administration, nothing on the FBI falsifying evidence against Flynn, and I probably missed a few things.
No action (that we know of).
My take is: why would the media need to keep pumping out fake headlines about Barr and Durham if there was nothing? As recent as this morning. "NYT Barr is stepping down!" .... 2 hours later, "DOJ tells CBS Barr intends to stay in as long as Trump needs him.
This is not how you treat a benign opponent.