5295
Comments (185)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
RPchill1 6 points ago +6 / -0

I literally shouted what you just wrote almost verbatim at someone today who was being a doomer.

5
ShiterallyLaking 5 points ago +5 / -0

Makes you really just wanna literally slap some sense into them to see if it'll wake them from their stupor, yeah?

On top of that bit of info, like Patrick also said, you have these various markers with a 100% reliability for predicting presidential elections, and I'm supposed to unquestioningly believe that not one, but E V E R Y. S I N G L E. O N E. failed, and ALL AT THE SAME TIME --- and this is all normal and expected cause "mail in voting favors democrats" as if mail-in voting is this brand new thing we know nothing about?

No one would tolerate this kind of shit for even low-stakes crap like a bingo game, yet we're being hurried and threatened into accepting it for the election of the leader of the free world.

4
RPchill1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly! The argument started over EXACTLY that… I was giving the rundown of all the historical predictive markers that Trump SMASHED and the doomer said predictive markers don't matter - only MUH PROOF and MUH MAIL-IN BALLOTS. AAAAARRRRRGGG!!!! It's like when Lucy pulls the football for the 100thousandth time.

3
ShiterallyLaking 3 points ago +3 / -0

They don't put stock in any predictive markers, yet they'll believe any poll put in front of them by The Party -- how convenient for them!