210
Comments (8)
sorted by:
3
LibertyDay 3 points ago +3 / -0

Too bad Rudy didn't show this timeline to her at the hearing.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Belleoffreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mmmmmkay, I think there may be a deal, in here. How about we approach her friendly-like, and ask for her vote to correct this mess? She was right, before, wasn't she?

1
PlateOwner [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's kind of ironic how she "gets" most of it, ending with the corruption of a self-serving contract, without saying one side or the other could use it for corrupting an election.

1
Winter_Is_Coming2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

So she figured out how to make money off of lobbying, then figured out how to leverage the fraud To help her and her party

1
PlateOwner [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

β€œWhy on earth would we buy less secure machines that are opposed by the voters; opposed by national security experts; at risk of being decertified right now in New York; are far more expensive than the hand-marked paper ballots; are possibly going to be decertified by the National Election authorities within two to four years when we're taking out a 20-year bond?

β€œAnd you start saying, β€˜Why on earth would we buy these things?!’ I have been baffled--absolutely baffled! This is not a partisan issue. You don't do voting machines on a party-line vote--this is crazy!”

β€œI've been given absolutely no good reason why we should buy these things. There's not one good reason, so, therefore it just reeks of corruption that we're prioritizing vendors over voters!

β€œAll voters oppose this--right wing, left wing! The only people that don't are the ones that want the contract as big as humanly possible!”

1
rayshade 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rants are epic until payoff levels reached, then sides switched. True politician!

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1