Mmmmmkay, I think there may be a deal, in here. How about we approach her friendly-like, and ask for her vote to correct this mess? She was right, before, wasn't she?
It's kind of ironic how she "gets" most of it, ending with the corruption of a self-serving contract, without saying one side or the other could use it for corrupting an election.
βWhy on earth would we buy less secure machines that are opposed by the voters; opposed by national security experts; at risk of being decertified right now in New York; are far more expensive than the hand-marked paper ballots; are possibly going to be decertified by the National Election authorities within two to four years when we're taking out a 20-year bond?
βAnd you start saying, βWhy on earth would we buy these things?!β I have been baffled--absolutely baffled! This is not a partisan issue. You don't do voting machines on a party-line vote--this is crazy!β
βI've been given absolutely no good reason why we should buy these things. There's not one good reason, so, therefore it just reeks of corruption that we're prioritizing vendors over voters!
βAll voters oppose this--right wing, left wing! The only people that don't are the ones that want the contract as big as humanly possible!β
Too bad Rudy didn't show this timeline to her at the hearing.
Mmmmmkay, I think there may be a deal, in here. How about we approach her friendly-like, and ask for her vote to correct this mess? She was right, before, wasn't she?
It's kind of ironic how she "gets" most of it, ending with the corruption of a self-serving contract, without saying one side or the other could use it for corrupting an election.
So she figured out how to make money off of lobbying, then figured out how to leverage the fraud To help her and her party
Rants are epic until payoff levels reached, then sides switched. True politician!