49
posted ago by ClarityPlease ago by ClarityPlease +49 / -0

Edit: Important thread posted below by gormmm

They are two different arguments.

This community is currently having an uncivil discussions about which one it truly is. I took part in that.

The answer is both.

The 0.26% comes from this article referencing an entire hand audit of 14,192 votes. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/12/06/georgia-yall-got-a-problem/#more-205775

The second argument, is about the Seized Dominion Voting Machine test. This is about after-the-fact checking of manipulated Dominion systems to see if they were counting a Trump vote as a Trump vote. They weren't. This specific machine was pushing, assuming a ballot = 1 ballot, a 0.87 Trump:Biden 1.13 as tweeted here in the second tweet: https://twitter.com/robbhurstCPA/status/1335557578798010368

I believe the number 37 is just a coincidence in the two arguments.

Comments (8)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
AnaMerican_1776 6 points ago +6 / -0

it doesn't matter if it's .00000000000001%

Criminal election fraud is criminal election fraud.

This is like arguing about the cock size of the rapist.

2
LaisreVortnoc 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep. Best case scenario is it's only .26% ... Seemingly insignificant, but has huge implications when applied to millions of votes.