1231
Comments (26)
sorted by:
20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
14
Chuj 14 points ago +14 / -0

Debooonk Braynard? Good luck, lefty loser!!

12
Testosteroneape2000 12 points ago +12 / -0

Whet is he an expert in? Treason?

11
UnderCoverTrumper 11 points ago +11 / -0

This is very frustrating. Any word on how compromised the judge is? Even if the arguments are absolutely without merit a biased judge may decide to overlook that.

6
PolishBaldEagle [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not yet, but stay tuned! This will be a really exciting week!

3
UnderCoverTrumper 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think you are right! Not to go all metaphysical on you but last night I had a dream that convinced me we are heading into a turning point!

7
wildcat1020 7 points ago +7 / -0

Keep the ridiculous deboonks coming. I feel like I should write a book like "The 100 most ridiculous debooonks debunked"

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
PolishBaldEagle [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

ROFL!! Almost spit out my coffee laughing!! 🤣🤣🤣

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
PeoplesRepublicNJ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't steal my idea but I've been collecting tweets from throughout the Trump era. One day I hope to publish a coffee table book of the most ridiculous shit the left said between 2015 and 2024.

Should be a bestseller after the next 4 years and the Overton Window shift back to American exceptionalism!

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Wenger 3 points ago +3 / -0

They are sending their best. That's the sad part.

"Why do we always get the dumb ones?" John Leguizamo in Spawn. People who do Satan's work aren't the smartest.

2
PolishBaldEagle [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

The legal system is filled with democratic lawyers. Most attorneys are Democrats, I personally know that (I’m not a lawyer though). I have faith though. The evidence is prevailing

2
Dreeval 2 points ago +2 / -0

Translation; silly goose=faggot

2
OGRapHat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this part of the Dems "4000 lawyers standing by"?

2
PolishBaldEagle [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

What, 4000 lawyers trying to convince everyone that Fraud is NOT EVIDENCE of Fraud??

2
OtherwiseSafe 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the sad reality - Democrats only need something, anything to cling to. It doesn't have to be factual or logical. It just needs to be a statement - any statement - that claims that their position is the right one. And they will hold it high regardless of how foolish they sound while they ridicule your argument away. They are disgusting, evil, stupid creatures, and I tire of them.

1
LetMeBeFrank 1 point ago +1 / -0

Repeat after me: all dems are traitors and their voters complicit.

1
LRRP 1 point ago +1 / -0

On the bright side of all the corrupt bullshit, at least he forced a response instead of deepstate ignoring it. If they have to fight his evidence then it’s evidence, as Matt’s is a data driven and not conjecture.

1
PartisanHack 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's probably and FBI or CIA expert who have been working to debunk the data since he donated his finding to the FBI. Should not have given the data. If the FBI actually wanted to do their jobs, they would have been in front of this.

1
kornesque 1 point ago +1 / -0

silly goose

kek

1
FluffiPuff 1 point ago +1 / -0

BRUTAL - this is absolute gaslighting.

1
My2Cents 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who needs debunkers when you have crooked judges who'll just ignore the evidence?

0
crash7863 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ansolabehere

Hans Solo be here.

Did I read that right?