One of America's great miscarriages of justice, the Supreme Court's infamous 1927 Buck v. Bell ruling made government sterilization of "undesirable" citizens the law of the land. New York Times bestselling author Adam Cohen tells the story in Imbeciles of one of the darkest moments in the American legal tradition: the Supreme Court's decision to champion eugenic sterilization for the greater good of the country. In 1927, when the nation was caught up in eugenic fervor, the justices allowed Virginia to sterilize Carrie Buck, a perfectly normal young woman, for being an "imbecile."

It is a story with many villains, from the superintendent of the Dickensian Virginia Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded who chose Carrie for sterilization to the former Missouri agriculture professor and Nazi sympathizer who was the nation's leading advocate for eugenic sterilization. But the most troubling actors of all were the eight Supreme Court justices who were in the majority--including William Howard Taft, the former president; Louis Brandeis, the legendary progressive; and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., America's most esteemed justice, who wrote the decision urging the nation to embark on a program of mass eugenic sterilization.

Knowing that it is an mRNA vaccine , you should already know the sterilization part is not even the worst part of it. My doctor went thru all thr info about this vaccine with me a month ago, showed me why this is the first vaccine ever that deals with DNA in humans. She said she is not anti vax but she says she has a hard time believing her own eyes and believing that they would put this crap in people with a virus that is not isolated (doesnt exist, or they are taking the new flu strain that comes out every year and calling it a viral pandemic called covid), and has a 99.7 percent survival, rate among the young and 90 percent survival rate among the elderly. Also she knows the PCR tests are not accurate at all and understands the maker of these tests even told governments to stop testing with those kits. But she knows they are inflating numbers on purpose, so they won't stop using them when it benefits what they want to do. This chemical makeup of these vaccines coming out are in essence all the same vaccine with a different name attached (Moderna, phizer etcetc). They may slightly differ in inactive ingredients but said there are very big similarities within all of them in which first, they all will be adding to your DNA structure which is why they are all considered "RNA" vaccines. The word "recombinant" is a prevalent word in describing all these vax. She explains that when they do this to fruits and vegetables they are called "GMO"'s or Genetically Modified Organisms. On the outside they are the same tomato or orange or what have you, inside they are no longer considered a tomato or orange but a chimera of sorts of the garden variety. Same thing with us, they inject you and add to your DNA changing your sequencing your no longer technically a human but you are a GMO or Chimera on the inside, but outwardly you still look like a human. She even says this vaccine is not just a one or two dose thing but a first step in a multi step process. They don't intend for the shots to stop. She knows this vaccine has implications relating to your thought process, taking away any rebellion like features about you or religious beliefs you may have. Which reminds me of what that guy said that volunteered for the vax testing when he said "God died" in him. Even the pentagon video where they show you how vaccines will work in the future called RNA vaxs where they can make a "religious fanatic" be a "Normal person". Its happening now. Look up the chemical make up of the vaxs and look up recombinant. When you do you will see they take "genetic material" from two different sources and you will see one of the sources is genetic material of aborted baby parts. Its messed up, but thats why we need to be researching. This is dangerous. If my doctor sees this crap, why can't we get others to see thisz?

Serious question. My 85 yr old parents (who have both already survived Kung Flu) both want to take vaccine so they can rejoin society - get back to church, see their friends, etc.

I am not about to tell them no - as they have earned the right to do whatever the hell they want, imo. If they want to start using heroine and drinking at 9am while eating chocolate cake for breakfast - go big, says I.

Is there a reason why the elderly, at risk population should not take it?