6123
Comments (174)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
57
Kozio_ 57 points ago +58 / -1

Did you know they've never found the full body of a T-rex? They usually only find the skull and a few misc bones. Imagine getting 20-100 pieces of a 2000 piece puzzle and then telling the world you know exactly what the finished puzzle looks like

35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
17
WeinerLapTop 17 points ago +17 / -0

Buncha slcakjawed faggots around here.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
InTheKnow 7 points ago +7 / -0

We didn't have facebook so they could fact check our findings. The next thing will be "This finding of T-rex has been disputed" lol.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
Fox19 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well........that was an unexpected twist!

2
NoahGav 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was it though? It's the only logical explanation.

17
bigdickhangsright 17 points ago +17 / -0

Strawberries aren't actually berries but bananas and tomatoes are.

13
Jackdagger 13 points ago +13 / -0

Orrrrrr....is the NWO planting false history?....reptilians don't want you to find what their ancestors look like. Kek

6
FutureFreemason 6 points ago +7 / -1

I've had someone deeply explain why he thinks dinosaurs are a hoax and it's hard to argue. He believes it was a part of the push against religion. If you go back to the Reformation era sociologists talk about how the greatest impacts were explaining things that used to be explained by God or gods. Things like dead seasons are explained by religious myth, same with plagues from classical mythology.

3
Meddlesom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is he aware of dinosaur fossils being discovered long before Christianity, and even being made into tools and artwork by primitive man?

2
tombombadil 2 points ago +2 / -0

How does that make the dinosaurs a hoax?

1
Farmerbob1 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's only hard to argue against the existence of dinosaurs if the person you are arguing with is a friend, and they are unwilling to think.

Saying "You're a fucking idiot" to a friend, and being clear you mean it, is hard.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
9
thewashambro [S] 9 points ago +10 / -1

Well still, the point remains. That was found less than a month ago, and they have been saying they know what it looks like for decades

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
thewashambro [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh. guess I missed that. Still they've been saying what it looked like for 70 years

4
Kozio_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well shoot my knowledge is a month old. If they've had it since 2006 it's weird to publish something about it now. unfortunately it's hard to see if the trex looks like previous trex when it actually looks like a smooshed turd embedded in a rock :(

This is definitely something I would actually want to see in a museum though so I guess we'll wait until 2022

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Kozio_ 1 point ago +2 / -1

I like a theory I recently heard, that trex skulls are actually dragon skulls. Dragon bones would be hollow thus harder to recover. Why else did every culture talk about dragons

4
zooty 4 points ago +4 / -0

Didn't they decide they basically had the brontosaurus back-to-front a few years back?