I've been saying that since election night when Virginia looked identical to all the swing states. Was called before a single vote came in, and Trump stayed ahead until the middle of the night with over 90% of the votes counted in EVERY county.
We all look at the Swing States where they needed to perform some major magic and fucked up doing it - but there's so many others that aren't even questioned that just slipped out of view as they 'were a given anyway'.
Remember: They sometimes went as brazen as to change up to 30% of the vote as Dr.Shiva showed. I would not be suprised if CA and NY had gone red after all.
Joe is an absolute shit tier candidate, worse than Mondale and maybe also every other major opponent since at least 100years.
Mondale in '84 had at the end 40% pop vote and carried only two states - but Joe as a candidate was definitely worse than him and should even score way lower than that.
Eh, I do think that a lot of people did vote against Trump thanks to the combined conditioning of #orangemanbad and #vote. But, I sincerely doubt it was anywhere near the numbers of new Trump voters that Trump picked up. I think Biden's actual total vote number was about the same as Hillary's. The Trump:Biden margin was wider than the Trump:Hillary margin. I think that Trump probably won the popular vote that year too and that the 2.5 million difference was fraudulent too.
It's an election truism that the more people that genuinely HATE your candidate, the more people like them too, and people are MUCH more likely to vote for someone they like, as opposed to someone they hate. The haters also tend to split their vote across Third Parties. All in all, a highly talked about candidate (even for the wrong reasons) tends to generate more votes For than Against.
I think Biden's actual total vote number was about the same as Hillary's.
Biden performed worse than Hillary across the board, even in counties he won.
The only areas he performed better were almost exclusively the 4 metropolitan areas that he needed to carry PA, GA, WI, and MI. Ignoring the shenanigans in Maricopa AZ, NV, and possibly other states where his performance was slightly better than Hillary's for reasons that can only be explained through fraud.
I've been saying that since election night when Virginia looked identical to all the swing states. Was called before a single vote came in, and Trump stayed ahead until the middle of the night with over 90% of the votes counted in EVERY county.
I think Joe didn't even carry Delaware.
We all look at the Swing States where they needed to perform some major magic and fucked up doing it - but there's so many others that aren't even questioned that just slipped out of view as they 'were a given anyway'.
Remember: They sometimes went as brazen as to change up to 30% of the vote as Dr.Shiva showed. I would not be suprised if CA and NY had gone red after all.
Joe is an absolute shit tier candidate, worse than Mondale and maybe also every other major opponent since at least 100years.
Mondale in '84 had at the end 40% pop vote and carried only two states - but Joe as a candidate was definitely worse than him and should even score way lower than that.
Eh, I do think that a lot of people did vote against Trump thanks to the combined conditioning of #orangemanbad and #vote. But, I sincerely doubt it was anywhere near the numbers of new Trump voters that Trump picked up. I think Biden's actual total vote number was about the same as Hillary's. The Trump:Biden margin was wider than the Trump:Hillary margin. I think that Trump probably won the popular vote that year too and that the 2.5 million difference was fraudulent too.
It's an election truism that the more people that genuinely HATE your candidate, the more people like them too, and people are MUCH more likely to vote for someone they like, as opposed to someone they hate. The haters also tend to split their vote across Third Parties. All in all, a highly talked about candidate (even for the wrong reasons) tends to generate more votes For than Against.
Biden performed worse than Hillary across the board, even in counties he won.
The only areas he performed better were almost exclusively the 4 metropolitan areas that he needed to carry PA, GA, WI, and MI. Ignoring the shenanigans in Maricopa AZ, NV, and possibly other states where his performance was slightly better than Hillary's for reasons that can only be explained through fraud.
I couldn't agree more. I wouldn't be surprised if it was similar to the 1984 election map.