Also Powell and Lin Wood's information is not necessarily better. They keep repeating false information such as super secret seized servers and Trump winning 410 electoral votes. Barnes seems more grounded in reality.
He was correct in predicting that Powell's lawsuit would not anywhere. He said the day she filed that she filed in the wrong court (federal court instead of state court) and it would get dismissed for no standing. So he does appear to know what he is talking about from what I see.
Says that Dominion would never be able to be proven in time and they were happy to do stuff with Dominion (such as hand recounts) but the real fraud is in the mail-in ballots which is they they have distracted from signature checks and audits.
This is what you call confirmation bias . Finding validity in his predictions that turned out to be correct , whilst ignoring the rest of his nostradamus predictions that fell on their head .
It's the exact same principle psychics , mediums & cold readers use .
Barnes says that its worth looking into the machines (he's not a fan of them and thinks we should go to paper only). But says that focusing on too much when we are on such a tight deadline would run out the clock.
We should have been 100% focused on the mail-in ballots. For example, we were close to getting signature checks in a few states because all the pressure was on that, until Powell started taking the spotlight with Dominion, then they offered to do just a hand recount instead. The #1 goal needs to be getting Trump re-elected, even if that means focusing on the easiest to prove fraud which would do that.
Barnes was helping out behind the scenes working with Powell and Rudy.
I've seen Powell repeat so much false information, that I don't entirely trust everything she says. I believe she's a patriot and a fight and a good person but she falls for unvetted information.
She's a great prosecutor (that's where all her experience is in) but has no experience in election law.
So far what Barnes has been saying has been true.
We kept hearing about how the Kraken was going to be so big it was going to be the golden hammer to flip the states. That there was no way it would get shot down. Some of us kept saying the solid evidence wasn't there, there was no bombshell evidence that the votes were actually flipped. Also I'm not sure what happened to the witnesses Powell claims to have that are within the government and saw votes getting switched. Last we heard they got beat up so couldn't talk, and never heard about it again.
The problem that I see people make here is assign good characteristics to people because of past achievements and then assume they can never be wrong or make mistakes.
What is his experience in electorial law exactly ? No evidence .
He told you that .
What's the evidence that he was working with Trump personally ?
No evidence , He told you that .
I could go on & on .....
If you want to be a mouth piece for Barnes then I'm fine with that .
But religiously regurgitating every word that comes out of his mouth as fact without verifying or even a cursory look as to see if anything he is claiming is true is no better than watching CNN .
Barnes was in Georgia and his push was to get signature audits. He says that is where the fraud is. They stuffed and counted hundreds of thousands of fraudulent mail-in ballots in key Democrat cities/counties (6 of them mostly) while kicking out observers. There's a reason they worked and pushed so hard to get mail-in ballots and then get rid of all the security measures.
And I agree. I've been saying this before I heard Barnes talking about it. The steal was not as big as some people seem to think. Some think its a worldwide conspiracy theory with overseas control rooms flipping votes, CIA dark ops and seized servers, and shooting wars going on between the military and CIA, and that every single county in the United States was behind the steal (according to Powell who says that Trump won every single county by 7+ points).
Where is Powell's source for that claim? She won't say, but we can only speculate it from the story of the seized servers that started on a Q site, then a tweet, then the tweet was repeated by Gurham, then it made it on OAN, where Powell retweeted it and took it as truth.
I remember when all the pressure was focused on signatures until Powell derailed on the Kraken and CIA black helicopter conspiracy theories and communist plots from the ghosts of Chavez. It turned the whole thing into a circus and the media, Dems, and RINOs started laughing at us instead of being terrified of having all the attention focused on "why aren't you letting us check the signatures?"
So far he's been correct on everything. But I'm told that Barnes is an idiot and doesn't know anything or he's a Democrat shill (but I see no evidence to back that up).
I'm told I should "Trust Powell" and "Trust Lin Wood" instead, but so far they haven't done anything to help Trump.
1 day until Biden electors are selected. 1 week until Biden is certified President-Elect.
I don't know... I think I'd trust Flynn and Powell over Barnes. I would imagine that their information is better...
Also Powell and Lin Wood's information is not necessarily better. They keep repeating false information such as super secret seized servers and Trump winning 410 electoral votes. Barnes seems more grounded in reality.
He was correct in predicting that Powell's lawsuit would not anywhere. He said the day she filed that she filed in the wrong court (federal court instead of state court) and it would get dismissed for no standing. So he does appear to know what he is talking about from what I see.
Says that Dominion would never be able to be proven in time and they were happy to do stuff with Dominion (such as hand recounts) but the real fraud is in the mail-in ballots which is they they have distracted from signature checks and audits.
This is what you call confirmation bias . Finding validity in his predictions that turned out to be correct , whilst ignoring the rest of his nostradamus predictions that fell on their head .
It's the exact same principle psychics , mediums & cold readers use .
I forget, what is barnes doing about this? I mean, we can all be monday morning quarterbacks, but he seems to be doing nothing at all.
He was helping out with the Trump legal team (working with Powell and Rudy).
Barnes says that its worth looking into the machines (he's not a fan of them and thinks we should go to paper only). But says that focusing on too much when we are on such a tight deadline would run out the clock.
We should have been 100% focused on the mail-in ballots. For example, we were close to getting signature checks in a few states because all the pressure was on that, until Powell started taking the spotlight with Dominion, then they offered to do just a hand recount instead. The #1 goal needs to be getting Trump re-elected, even if that means focusing on the easiest to prove fraud which would do that.
Barnes was helping out behind the scenes working with Powell and Rudy.
Two ways to expose the fraud:
Fake/illegal ballots
Rigged voting machines.
Problem is we are on a deadline and the machines would never be able to be proven in time.
The easy way to prove the fraud is to check signatures and do an audit. But Barnes says Dominion took the spotlight and distracted from all that.
I've seen Powell repeat so much false information, that I don't entirely trust everything she says. I believe she's a patriot and a fight and a good person but she falls for unvetted information.
She's a great prosecutor (that's where all her experience is in) but has no experience in election law.
So far what Barnes has been saying has been true.
We kept hearing about how the Kraken was going to be so big it was going to be the golden hammer to flip the states. That there was no way it would get shot down. Some of us kept saying the solid evidence wasn't there, there was no bombshell evidence that the votes were actually flipped. Also I'm not sure what happened to the witnesses Powell claims to have that are within the government and saw votes getting switched. Last we heard they got beat up so couldn't talk, and never heard about it again.
The problem that I see people make here is assign good characteristics to people because of past achievements and then assume they can never be wrong or make mistakes.
What is his experience in electorial law exactly ? No evidence . He told you that .
What's the evidence that he was working with Trump personally ? No evidence , He told you that .
I could go on & on .....
If you want to be a mouth piece for Barnes then I'm fine with that . But religiously regurgitating every word that comes out of his mouth as fact without verifying or even a cursory look as to see if anything he is claiming is true is no better than watching CNN .
Barnes was in Georgia and his push was to get signature audits. He says that is where the fraud is. They stuffed and counted hundreds of thousands of fraudulent mail-in ballots in key Democrat cities/counties (6 of them mostly) while kicking out observers. There's a reason they worked and pushed so hard to get mail-in ballots and then get rid of all the security measures.
And I agree. I've been saying this before I heard Barnes talking about it. The steal was not as big as some people seem to think. Some think its a worldwide conspiracy theory with overseas control rooms flipping votes, CIA dark ops and seized servers, and shooting wars going on between the military and CIA, and that every single county in the United States was behind the steal (according to Powell who says that Trump won every single county by 7+ points).
Where is Powell's source for that claim? She won't say, but we can only speculate it from the story of the seized servers that started on a Q site, then a tweet, then the tweet was repeated by Gurham, then it made it on OAN, where Powell retweeted it and took it as truth.
I remember when all the pressure was focused on signatures until Powell derailed on the Kraken and CIA black helicopter conspiracy theories and communist plots from the ghosts of Chavez. It turned the whole thing into a circus and the media, Dems, and RINOs started laughing at us instead of being terrified of having all the attention focused on "why aren't you letting us check the signatures?"
So far he's been correct on everything. But I'm told that Barnes is an idiot and doesn't know anything or he's a Democrat shill (but I see no evidence to back that up).
I'm told I should "Trust Powell" and "Trust Lin Wood" instead, but so far they haven't done anything to help Trump.
1 day until Biden electors are selected. 1 week until Biden is certified President-Elect.
Tick tock. They better produce soon.