I never said that. I'm saying radical feminism wasn't required for the normalization of women in the workforce because it was ongoing and becoming more commonplace on it's own. Women held prominent positions in the 1930's and were boosted tremendously by the labor shortages caused by WW2. If you think women are somehow better off now than they were in the 1950's you need to really examine what changed starting in the 1960's because the ultimate losers of feminism were women.
Nah I agree with you that women are worse off as a whole actually because I think most are actually the housewife/Etsy store on the side type. My mom I think would have been happier as a housewife rather than a working mom. I’m just saying, feminism did benefit the minority of women who wanted some else, not necessarily more, in life.
I never said that. I'm saying radical feminism wasn't required for the normalization of women in the workforce because it was ongoing and becoming more commonplace on it's own. Women held prominent positions in the 1930's and were boosted tremendously by the labor shortages caused by WW2. If you think women are somehow better off now than they were in the 1950's you need to really examine what changed starting in the 1960's because the ultimate losers of feminism were women.
Nah I agree with you that women are worse off as a whole actually because I think most are actually the housewife/Etsy store on the side type. My mom I think would have been happier as a housewife rather than a working mom. I’m just saying, feminism did benefit the minority of women who wanted some else, not necessarily more, in life.