Thanks pede I appreciate you. I'm familiar with a lot of the stats and agree. Cycle threshold is what I was looking for and I'm just trying to familiarize myself with terminology so as to not look like an uneducated fool if I were to ever bring any of this up in discussion. I'm certain alot of science is being weaponized against us so we can be labeled science deniers or whatever. Its hard to belive anything from what should be trusted institutions these days.
Bring up the flu, people have hardened their views on the virus, attack from the rear.
Ask them why Fauci wasn't calling for lock downs and masks in 2017-18.
From the CDC website:
"The overall burden of influenza for the 2017-2018 season was an estimated 45 million influenza illnesses, 21 million influenza-associated medical visits, 810,000 influenza-related hospitalizations, and 61,000 influenza-associated deaths (Table: Estimated Influenza Disease Burden, by Season — United States, 2010-11 through 2017-18 Influenza Seasons)."
Yet based on the same CDC, in July the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded by that time actually died from Covid and that ALL of those 6% deaths were among the frail and extremely elderly. That's 9,210 deaths
The other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses and the overwhelming majority of these were of very advanced age.
I came across some of the same info in my little bit of digging i did, but thank you for the links readily available. Was it the inventor of the test that wound up dead after mentioning how it could be misinterpreted? Thats what i thought I'd read although it didn't say how or if it was suspicious. I wish I had more time to go down these rabbit holes but a youngster running around the house takes priority.
Thanks pede I appreciate you. I'm familiar with a lot of the stats and agree. Cycle threshold is what I was looking for and I'm just trying to familiarize myself with terminology so as to not look like an uneducated fool if I were to ever bring any of this up in discussion. I'm certain alot of science is being weaponized against us so we can be labeled science deniers or whatever. Its hard to belive anything from what should be trusted institutions these days.
Bring up the flu, people have hardened their views on the virus, attack from the rear. Ask them why Fauci wasn't calling for lock downs and masks in 2017-18.
From the CDC website: "The overall burden of influenza for the 2017-2018 season was an estimated 45 million influenza illnesses, 21 million influenza-associated medical visits, 810,000 influenza-related hospitalizations, and 61,000 influenza-associated deaths (Table: Estimated Influenza Disease Burden, by Season — United States, 2010-11 through 2017-18 Influenza Seasons)."
link: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/2017-2018.htm
Yet based on the same CDC, in July the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded by that time actually died from Covid and that ALL of those 6% deaths were among the frail and extremely elderly. That's 9,210 deaths
The other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses and the overwhelming majority of these were of very advanced age.
link (this article has the CDC charts) : https://uncoverdc.com/2020/08/31/cdc-releases-new-data-6-of-total-deaths-are-from-coronavirus-only/
So 61,000 from the flu, no masks, no panic. Yet nine thousand deaths ALL among the frail and elderly, PANIC.
It was always and only about control.
RT-PCR=reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, commonly called a PCR test. CT=Cycle Threshold.
Here's a fairly straight-forward explanation of how the PCR test works:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mNhiNry8_Q&t=1s
Here's the inventor of the test explaining how the results can be misinterpreted:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xc0Kysti6Kc
Here's Dr. Fuckwad Fauci himself saying that PCR tests with a CT of 35+ are useless:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE&t=240s
I came across some of the same info in my little bit of digging i did, but thank you for the links readily available. Was it the inventor of the test that wound up dead after mentioning how it could be misinterpreted? Thats what i thought I'd read although it didn't say how or if it was suspicious. I wish I had more time to go down these rabbit holes but a youngster running around the house takes priority.