5775
Comments (215)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
31
tentigers99 31 points ago +32 / -1

"Allowed" instead of "required" is the excuse they're using.

32
deleted 32 points ago +32 / -0
16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
3
TonsOfSalt 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not just about knowing they could. It's about misleading observers into thinking the process was halted.

8
bill_in_texas 8 points ago +8 / -0

"The witnesses are all lying, your honor! We did NOT tell them all to GTFO! They all just happened to leave at the same time and not come back. I mean, that's not our problem, your honor."

Oh how I wish someone was audio recording and got it on tape that the announcement was made for everyone to leave. Maybe they have that and they're saving it for a time when they actually get to present their evidence in court? No point in providing that tape when your suit is getting bounced out anyway. Save it for the surprise shock and awe.

6
tentigers99 6 points ago +6 / -0

Excellent point!

3
Phil_DeGraves 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup.

"poll watchers shall be allowed to observe the [ballot tabulation] process"

If they were deceived into leaving by falsely being told work was done for the night, they were thereby NOT ALLOWED to observe. Clear violation of the law.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
-6
deleted -6 points ago +3 / -9
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
-4
deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6
-14
deleted -14 points ago +9 / -23
19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-11
deleted -11 points ago +8 / -19
8
TopperBlack 8 points ago +8 / -0

what if you approach it as:

They were told to leave the building, which means they were not allowed to remain.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
TrumpBringsLight 1 point ago +1 / -0

The will of the people

Are you kidding, that would be the will of the fraud perpetrators

-1
AnotherPedeInTheWall -1 points ago +1 / -2

How about they see judges swinging from their necks for denying the cases? Think that could change their fucking mind.

4
aboitm 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even if you concede that they choose to leave because everyone was told that they would stop counting, you have the same problem.

You cannot attend a party if you don't know where and when the party is taking place. No one would say they were allowed to go to a party if they don't know where and when it is happening.

To constrain the problem further, you wouldn't be allowed to go to a party that you knew where and had a general idea of when was happening, but the party organizer told you it would not be happening at the specific time the party was happening.

The injury in this sense it to all poll watchers who were not allowed to go to the State Farm arena, because they did not know an election process was taking place during that time.

The weaker injury is to the poll watchers who left.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
1
aboitm 1 point ago +1 / -0

I never did.

I said that if you allow someone to observe a process, you cannot say that they were allowed if the organizers misled them on the time and the place of the process in question.

4
EndHumanTrafficking2 4 points ago +4 / -0

They didn't choose to leave. They were told to leave. It's an idiotic argument. Saying they chose to leave when they were told to leave is a lie. Lies are all the pedocrats have, but relying on lies is not a good argument.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
1
EndHumanTrafficking2 1 point ago +1 / -0

You admit it's not true, then you say we have to live in reality.

Do you think every Republican poll watcher that was told to leave is going to lie to cover for the pedocrats? Or do you think every poll watcher that was told to leave will confirm that they were told to leave?

The pedocrats and their pedo enabling supporters are in trouble. Their argument is based on a lie. That's not a strong position to be in.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0