5775
Comments (215)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
cryogen 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not an "investigative team" because it's not a neutral party. You don't get to "investigate" yourself. It's merely a defense statement on the part of the accused.

Proof is proof, whether it's made its way into a court or not. And that statement is proven to be lies.

You'd have us believe Bernie Madoff's accountant before our own eyes. Just gtfo.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
cryogen 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're just repeating "but it was done by Madoff's accountant"! No shit, sherlock. I don't care what some crony of Madoff (read: Raffensperger) says. The fact that you do says you're a fucking moron or a crook.

Yes just like Madoff's accountant would do an "audit." Sure, yes. I'm sure that it was an "investigation." Please. The GA SoS is party to the alleged impropriety. And that means all of his cronies are as well. Statements by them are statements by the accused, not "investigations."