5775 () posted 129 days ago by ratioetlogicae 129 days ago by ratioetlogicae +5775 / -0 215 comments share 215 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (215) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 1 ▼ – ObjectiveReality 1 point 129 days ago +1 / -0 "shall be allowed" Even if you define shall as 'required', which in and of itself is a dubious overreach, all that is required then is that they be allowed. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 129 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – ObjectiveReality 1 point 129 days ago +1 / -0 Were they not allowed? Were they denied access or denied the opportunity? No. There's an argument to be made but it's not the one you're making, and not using the definitions you are. permalink parent save report block reply
"shall be allowed"
Even if you define shall as 'required', which in and of itself is a dubious overreach, all that is required then is that they be allowed.
Were they not allowed?
Were they denied access or denied the opportunity? No.
There's an argument to be made but it's not the one you're making, and not using the definitions you are.