2429
🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
posted ago by joseph_biden ago by joseph_biden +2429 / -0
Comments (79)
sorted by:
150
deleted 150 points ago +150 / -0
79
deleted 79 points ago +79 / -0
17
HEXEN 17 points ago +17 / -0

They're about to be

17
trump2036 17 points ago +17 / -0

it's also a stupid argument. We can't know if it changes the election till all the cases and evidence are made and seen.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
2
stjimmy92 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mickey voted straight D

10
borscht-nazi 10 points ago +10 / -0

>Dishonorable Judge

Enemy operative. Get it right.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
70
RiffFantastic 70 points ago +70 / -0

That doesn’t sound like a very legal argument to me.

45
deleted 45 points ago +45 / -0
18
Sumarongi 18 points ago +18 / -0

“car crash”

13
USRifle_Cal30M1 13 points ago +13 / -0

Everyone runs into a few bombs every now and then.

8
AnomalusCitizen7375 8 points ago +8 / -0

While driving 100+ mph

12
20KAG20 12 points ago +12 / -0

Which is great for us. That comment alone completely fucks his legal argument for dismissal when appealed. However, he should be hung for treason for it.

57
deleted 57 points ago +57 / -0
27
deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
5
Bldg_2019 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe, but she helped get us in this PA mess by abstaining on that PA mail vote case before the election.

1
aaafirefly123 1 point ago +1 / -0

At this point I don’t think it would have made a difference.

They would have done it anyway

1
RedBloodofPatriotism 1 point ago +1 / -0

I imagine that Trump spoke with them before reassigning the courts. I have no proof of this but it just seems like something he would do. It's at least what I would do.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
Data 1 point ago +1 / -0

SCOTUS needs to impeach these activist judges when this election fiasco is settled.

There's no way this tard can be allowed to continue hearing federal cases.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
36
Marble68 36 points ago +36 / -0

At some point - I fear people are going to start dragging these people into the streets and beating them to death, or simply grabbing them, taking them to a field, executing them, and burying the body.

They're misreading how angry people are - and simply saying "why uphold the law when it won't change the outcome IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE PEOPLE."

All that attitude does is encourage lawlessness and throws gasoline on a citizenry who feel the law doesn't matter any more and no one will stand up for them.

Judges like this are going to back people into a corner and they're going to explode in violent rage.

21
StaryHickory 21 points ago +21 / -0

They are completely misjudging the anger people are feeling. They are also failing to understand what kind of environment they will be in when EVERYONE views the rules and laws as "suggestions" not just the leftists and corrupt.

When the handcuffs of civility come off it's hard to predict who will be a casualty. But I know a lot of people are hoping its the corrupt assholes that are causing all this pain.

Once they pop this stuff off its going to be hard to put it back in the bottle no matter how much they may want to.

9
CantStumpTheTrump 9 points ago +9 / -0

At some point - I fear people are going to start dragging these people into the streets and beating them to death, or simply grabbing them, taking them to a field, executing them, and burying the body.

You spelled hope wrong.

7
Buildtheadytum 7 points ago +7 / -0

That bitch Raffensperger was saying today that GA needs to move on and focus on jobs.

I almost punched my windshield out.

6
Numaeus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why bother burying them? That's more trouble than they're worth.

3
AnomalusCitizen7375 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bury them in lead coffins that are screwed into the ground to make sure they don't find a way to come creeping back.

1
DJ_NeckFace 1 point ago +1 / -0

They might still vote democrat JTFO

3
HungNavySeal300Kills 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's getting time for us all to be laid off from our nice white collar jobs. They'll export all those jobs, then we can become janitors, maids, personal chefs, pool cleaners, tooling away next to the globalist traitors while they don't even see us.

They say it'll be years of suffering before they can implement full police state and UBI and legal maurijuana. Might as well call those years the purge. Things will get very nasty and extremely intimate.

2
Marble68 2 points ago +2 / -0

They'll start with guns after packing SCOTUS.

27
wethedownvoted 27 points ago +27 / -0

"even if we put the murderer in jail it won't bring the dead back to life, will it?"

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
21
SpookySpook 21 points ago +21 / -0

Imagine being a judge and not being interested on electoral fraud for the highest office in the land

7
HEXEN 7 points ago +7 / -0

chyna judge

10
DemsFuckKids 10 points ago +10 / -0

well she followed up very nicely with, "oh, fucking hell it wont!"

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
ShitOfPeace 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're thinking the political pressure will turn enough house members to vote Biden that they'll win in the house even if Biden doesn't get 270. They may be right.

We need to turn up the pressure from our side too and get these politicians to acknowledge that Biden's "win" was bullshit.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
Hammerhawk 6 points ago +6 / -0

Even if he is guilty of murder....it will never bring your daughter back

6
CyberSolider33 6 points ago +6 / -0

Was this judge a Liberal appointed judge?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
8
KekKafir 8 points ago +8 / -0

Worse. Globalist appointment. Fuck Bush, fuck RINOs, fuck Riggers and fuck Jannies

6
suckmycorona 6 points ago +6 / -0

So basically he doesn’t want to do his job. Means he can step down then.

5
AmericanGuy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just to paraphrase: "Why should we punish murderer's? It won't bring the victim back to life."

4
ironhorse 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's a crime.

"engaging in partisan political activity or making inappropriately partisan statements"

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Deplora 3 points ago +3 / -0

This will be helpful in getting SCOTUS to take the case, although as far as this particular step in this particular case is concerned, SCOTUS would probably only rule on the standing issue, since that (from what I've read -- haven't seen the actual ruling) is the only actual holding in the ruling.

3
DTvoter73777777 3 points ago +3 / -0

If I was Sydney , I would of said” it would of proven to me that you weren’t a puppet of the liberals instead you just proved you sold out your country and you should be removed from your judgeship”

3
TheMAGAlorian787 3 points ago +3 / -0

What a freaking moron.

3
Jkend0740 3 points ago +3 / -0

The spineless coward also said the 11th circuit would just overrule him regardless of his vote. These judges can’t keep getting away with this bullshit

3
Nice_n_tangy 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a step on the "You Are Here" chart.

3
womp_squared 3 points ago +3 / -0

No you dumb fuck. Georgia won't correct the election but it is one of 6 dominoes that needs to fall. That right there should be immediate grounds for dismissal without impeachment.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
womp_squared 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wasn't calling you a dumb fuck, I was directing that towards the fag judge. Just to clarify. It is not ok for Biden to get in. It would be the end of fair elections and the constitution

3
PatriotPepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

So judges are OK with fraud...go to know

3
bolonaro 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Let's normalise election fraud ..."

3
Magamom2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

DRAIN THE SWAMP

3
LugNuts 3 points ago +3 / -0

Link to where he/she said that?

2
RPD2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I too would like to hear this for myself.

2
MAGA_Master2 2 points ago +2 / -0

"He murdered and raped a woman in 20 other states so what does it matter if he's convicted here?"

2
BloodDe 2 points ago +2 / -0

The devil went down to Georgia he was looking for a vote to steal...

2
RPD2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Diversity hire?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
Blind_Marksman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whoever steals more votes is the winner.

Sounds familiar.

2
Billygoat65 2 points ago +2 / -0

The judge should be removed immediately!

2
JohnMcCainsTumors 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is it time to grab our fucking guns and get at it yet or what?

Patiently waiting...

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
RighterThanU 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Well, even if the murderer is convicted it still won’t bring back the deceased, will it?”

2
Nowsthetime 2 points ago +2 / -0

Listened to it, that wasn't exactly how it was phrased. It was more along the lines of "If Trump wins this, can he win elsewhere as well, and will this change the outcome of the, etc". Just saying that he didn't admit to voter fraud.

1
streakybacon 1 point ago +1 / -0

He asked it before he asked that version of the question.

2
Jleinf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Non engaged professionals are some of the dumbest mfers to ever speak. Stupid famous people are in a close second only because they fake shit for a living

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0