Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
What the fuck? I fucking hate word salads. So much harder to digest.
The first part of 2020 definition is true but I guess truth is now "racism".
And the second part is just ideological. Of course they list white supremacy, but what about black supremacy, or literally any other supremacist ideology. Nah, they gotta hate on whitey.
The first definition IS ABSOLUTELY NOT true. I cannot stress that enough.
From its first use, "racism" meant the practice of discriminating based on race. If you thought some races were better than others, that was not racism. It was just your opinion.
The "evil of racism" is when employers wouldn't hire you despite your qualifications only because you were black, or you weren't allowed to enter a certain establishment because you were oriental, or you couldn't marry someone because if differing race.
Racism is about practice. It is not about personal opinion.
I have an 1892 Webster’s dictionary and a set of 1924 Compton’s Encyclopedias. Couldn’t find racism in those either. And the only definition I could find for “gay” means cheerful or frolicsome.
“1892 Webster’s Dictionary”...every patriot should own a copy of this, it is a thing of beauty.
Hands down the best copy one can get (regarding binding/paper quality and text clarity) is the facsimile edition published by “Foundation For American Christian Education”.
Neither is schizophrenia. Homosexual is in there but it’s with those quickie bottom margin words and it says something like a detestable disorder of some kind
1913 Webster has as its third sense "Loose; dissipated; lewd. [Colloq.]" This is referring to how it was a euphemism for (straight) sexual promiscuity at the time. Not too hard to guess how the code evolved.
Dictionaries used to try keeping the vulgar tongue out of them where possible (and most printers did, too, so they might have had trouble keeping adequate citations around anyway). Webster 1913 isn't really an exception--the same dictionary doesn't list some very well known four-letter Anglo-Saxonisms and minced oaths. (Nor does Dr. Johnson's, who despite his misgivings about the USA, is of great service when we talk about the language of the Founding Fathers, the Constitution, and Bill of Rights.)
I have one of those 50 pound ten thousand page monstrosity of a dictionary from around 1941. Grandpa bought it for the kids to teach em you know...words. A new word in the dictionary was Blitzkrieg... I will have to check on the naughty words.
RACE, noun [Latin radix and radius having the same original. This word coincides in origin with rod, ray, radiate, etc.]
The lineage of a family, or continued series of descendants from a parent who is called the stock. A race is the series of descendants indefinitely. Thus all mankind are called the race of Adam; the Israelites are of the race of Abraham and Jacob. Thus we speak of a race of kings, the race of Clovis or Charlemagne; a race of nobles, etc.
Even the 1982 definition is incorrect. The actual definition is: "the belief that ones own race is inherently superior to others". Racism is a belief, not an action. You cannot be "racist against" something. The proper term for believing that a specific race is inferior is called "racialism".
Very good post. I love collecting old books that detail the times it was written. Sort of like almanacs.
Have a good one from 1948 that has maps, population statistics, US and European history with a focus on most recent and even common dream interpretations.
How do you go about it? I've been considering searching online, but nothing compares to doing a day or couple day trip across some states and going antiquing. Titles and books that you never would have thought of just jump out at you.
I was in Glasgow Scotland at one point and found myself in a basement old/used bookstore that was packed with books. Very old print dates with interesting subjects for low prices. Like I got an old nonfiction book on the Black Watch (Scottish troop) print date late 1890's for $3. Great read.
Only had a backpack though and had to fly back to the states eventually so had to limit myself to 3 or 4 good acquisitions lol
So judgmental ;) But I do agree, if I can get interesting books with pre-1900's print dates I hop on it.
Having almanac type books from many different times is interesting all the same. I've just liked to hit up some antique shops specifically for books if I travel to places for whatever reason. Then bars haha.
I don't disagree, I think it's simply important to not mince words or meaning in such a crazy time. As long as you weight books pre these dates then you're good on the "truth factor" of the material. Sadly material loses its truthiness very rapidly after these time markers. Partially this is due to moving away from prime sources while it is also simply a fact that the media was conglomerated under communists and communist precursors starting in the 1880s, kicked into 3rd gear during the 1910s and then overdrive post 1930.
We should try to get a sharing "book club" together.
Haha I got two different responses to my inbox yet same-ish content. Edit or double post?
"We should try to get a sharing book club together" Totally, having a book dom-win (or whatever they will call them) with a SPECIFIC anti-leftist bias will be great.
The types who just make reading/books/etc their whole lives tend to be liberal and shit up communities because they have nothing better to do and just want to act better/more knowledgeable than everyone.
Crazy, server hung for over a minute when I posted and I had to post again..... at least I thought.
Yes, you are 100% right. There is an allure to humanism-intellectualism to a certain type that prefer luciferian based doctrine founded on the principles of old Babylon that is very much still alive.
Double posting happened again, or at least double post in the notifications haha
Word, I've only started touching philosophical stuff within the past couple years so can't say on the doctrines/principals. I'm going through Prometheus Rising right now (reading online, didn't buy a book) which seems pretty leftist and has mentioned luciferian/babylon. Somewhat interesting all the same.
Crazy, server hung for over a minute when I posted and I had to post again..... at least I thought.
Yes, you are 100% right. There is an allure to humanism-intellectualism to a certain type that prefer luciferian based doctrine founded on the principles of old Babylon that is very much still alive.
I don't disagree, I think it's simply important to not mince words or meaning in such a crazy time. As long as you weight books pre these dates then you're good on the "truth factor" of the material. Sadly material loses its truthiness very rapidly after these time markers. Partially this is due to moving away from prime sources while it is also simply a fact that the media was conglomerated under communists and communist precursors starting in the 1880s, kicked into 3rd gear during the 1910s and then overdrive post 1930.
Yes, have your own collection - physical copies that can't be changed - of things like the Constitution, important papers written by the Founding Fathers, good history/civics books especially if you have kids, dictionary, encyclopedias.
Remember that the leftists have every crazy goon in the country at their beck and call. They called off most of the rioting and protesting for now, but when things don't go their way, they'll be back. They've been practicing, live fire, all summer, they burn things, throw explosives, shoot people, use lasers. They have no problem targeting women and children. Every one of us should be preparing, stock up your pantry, get yourselves in shape, have some books for your children. Most teachers are all in with brainwashing them, and even sneakily using your kids to find out what's going on in your house or what you think.
They won't just slink away, they'll double down and refuse to admit they're wrong while they send in their mobs.
Not far enough back. You need to go Pre-WWII. That's where the trouble really started. The end of WWII ushered in the USA (and USA based publishing houses) as a global hegemony.
I'm working on it, but the Second International (the one with "dord" ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
) is a beautiful tome with marbled endpapers and sides, and usually sells for a bit. At the least, the Third goes back to 1961, before much damage was done I would think, and it has an appendix for the "new" words.
Important to get as close to primary source as possible. Jewish encyclopaediae are amazing in this regard. You will find books that you had no idea exist if you read these. The rabbit hole is has no end in sight here.
Gather up anything pre-WW2 and ESPECIALLY get anything pre-WW1 that you can find. ANYTHING. Even reference books of all sorts.
The first edition of Encyclopaedia Judaica is extremely valuable and offers tremendous reference value to books that you should try to find for primary source material. There are other such enclopaediae as well that are really amazing that you can dig up if you begin looking into which books and such references were used to craft that. It is arguable that Jewish vaults have the most important information left that is being rapidly hidden.
Nothing on "the cloud" is as real as what's local. Print your pictures, too, that you want to keep. The ones of your kids. Of your parents. They won't last in your phone.
Print date 1950's and prior. In addition to some old 'almanac' type books with common wisdom, I have a couple late 1800's books about trade and international commerce at the time which were great reads.
You can keep an external HD too.
Record videos at 2x+ speed, compress.
Add the files for any useful programs you may want.
Maps. Constitution. Bible. Encyclopedias. Other books. Pictures.
We could probably put together a pretty extensive, yet solid ~500gb/1TB limit of an internet/survival/useful skills archive.
I already have a Gig worth of survival guides, along with other useful textbooks, on an old phone, and on a new phone, in the kit. Also in there is a battery kit and a solar powered charger.
If you can afford it, also be sure to buy Encyclopaedia Judaica (FIRST EDITION) and any other such similar books like this pre World War II and I if possible. I promise you, if you study these your mind will MELT and so many preconceptions will fall away!
If you can get books that are not already digitally available please scan them and share them carefully. The education level is beyond anything offered today.
“'Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. '”
Speaking of which, is anyone interested in me posting a picture of an approximate World War I-era dictionary defining the word "gender"? I promise it's quite enlightening.
Analogue is king! Digital is a programmer’s interpretation of reality. Could be accurate... could be make believe, or whatever said programmer/operator wants it to be - just like a Dominion vote. Thick dictionaries are dope!
Important to get as close to primary source as possible. Jewish encyclopaediae are amazing in this regard. You will find books that you had no idea exist if you read these. The rabbit hole is has no end in sight here.
Yeah, in the old days they could burn down the monastery or library and make up a new history. Then for a good while we could print so many freaking copies that was nearly impossible, as they were held physically. Once everything is online, Ooops! Cyber attack! Russia! Great Reset 2.0! We'll have to write history over! New history! (and your money is gone.)
This is too true and one of the reasons you should ALWAYS include Jewish encyclopaediae in your collection. There is so much information and references to books that you couldn't even imagine exist. This kind of primary source REFERENCES so that you can dig deeper is INVALUABLE in this time.
I've been saying for years that Merriam-Webster is politically active and that they change definitions based on fake google algorithms to support Leftist agendas.
Gender was synonymous with Sex in late 90's dictionaries.
By changing words it provide validity to arguments by the left while it erodes our ability to formulate debate material. But which corporations gain from this is my question.
What the fuck? I fucking hate word salads. So much harder to digest.
The first part of 2020 definition is true but I guess truth is now "racism". And the second part is just ideological. Of course they list white supremacy, but what about black supremacy, or literally any other supremacist ideology. Nah, they gotta hate on whitey.
The first definition IS ABSOLUTELY NOT true. I cannot stress that enough.
From its first use, "racism" meant the practice of discriminating based on race. If you thought some races were better than others, that was not racism. It was just your opinion.
The "evil of racism" is when employers wouldn't hire you despite your qualifications only because you were black, or you weren't allowed to enter a certain establishment because you were oriental, or you couldn't marry someone because if differing race.
Racism is about practice. It is not about personal opinion.
I have a 100 year old dictionary. The word racism didn’t exist
I have an 1892 Webster’s dictionary and a set of 1924 Compton’s Encyclopedias. Couldn’t find racism in those either. And the only definition I could find for “gay” means cheerful or frolicsome.
The Flintstones - "We'll have a gay old time!"
And don’t forget the song “Am I Blue?” (...was I gay until today...)
I only remember the Rita Coolidge version, but I see Billie Holiday and also Ray Charles had recorded this song.
And don’t forget Deck the Halls (gay apparel)
“Don we now our gay apparel falalalalalalalala!”
“1892 Webster’s Dictionary”...every patriot should own a copy of this, it is a thing of beauty. Hands down the best copy one can get (regarding binding/paper quality and text clarity) is the facsimile edition published by “Foundation For American Christian Education”.
Neither is schizophrenia. Homosexual is in there but it’s with those quickie bottom margin words and it says something like a detestable disorder of some kind
1913 Webster has as its third sense "Loose; dissipated; lewd. [Colloq.]" This is referring to how it was a euphemism for (straight) sexual promiscuity at the time. Not too hard to guess how the code evolved.
Dictionaries used to try keeping the vulgar tongue out of them where possible (and most printers did, too, so they might have had trouble keeping adequate citations around anyway). Webster 1913 isn't really an exception--the same dictionary doesn't list some very well known four-letter Anglo-Saxonisms and minced oaths. (Nor does Dr. Johnson's, who despite his misgivings about the USA, is of great service when we talk about the language of the Founding Fathers, the Constitution, and Bill of Rights.)
I have one of those 50 pound ten thousand page monstrosity of a dictionary from around 1941. Grandpa bought it for the kids to teach em you know...words. A new word in the dictionary was Blitzkrieg... I will have to check on the naughty words.
Hell I have some from the 80s, & it's not in any of them.
It was invented for the Soviets.
Check for 'racialism'.
I bet it is interesting browsing that dictionary!
I think he meant the first half of the first def.
What is funny is that the new definition descibes leftists to a tee. See “ White Privilege”.
Fuckin commie losers!
1828 Webster's: http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Race
RACE, noun [Latin radix and radius having the same original. This word coincides in origin with rod, ray, radiate, etc.]
This is so juicy and meaty. Where can I get one of these dictionaries?
Maybe eBay?
They're not decimating the language. And saying so is literally a conspiracy.
Even the 1982 definition is incorrect. The actual definition is: "the belief that ones own race is inherently superior to others". Racism is a belief, not an action. You cannot be "racist against" something. The proper term for believing that a specific race is inferior is called "racialism".
King James Bible has a built-in dictionary
You seriously don't know how to spell "dictionaries"? WTH?
😂😂😂
Ease up on grammar copping me, Karen.
Sincerely, The internet
I'll do as I damn well please. It's a free country. :)
Not sure what "starting people" means.
They're "starting people"? In broad daylight? WTH???
If biden steals the election we do Civil War part 2. This time no pardons for dems.
No quarter.
Curious to know, where a good place to find old history books can be found to purchase. Is there an American company I can use?
Very good post. I love collecting old books that detail the times it was written. Sort of like almanacs.
Have a good one from 1948 that has maps, population statistics, US and European history with a focus on most recent and even common dream interpretations.
How do you go about it? I've been considering searching online, but nothing compares to doing a day or couple day trip across some states and going antiquing. Titles and books that you never would have thought of just jump out at you.
I was in Glasgow Scotland at one point and found myself in a basement old/used bookstore that was packed with books. Very old print dates with interesting subjects for low prices. Like I got an old nonfiction book on the Black Watch (Scottish troop) print date late 1890's for $3. Great read.
Only had a backpack though and had to fly back to the states eventually so had to limit myself to 3 or 4 good acquisitions lol
Too recent, you need pre-WW2 and even pre-WW1 if you can.
So judgmental ;) But I do agree, if I can get interesting books with pre-1900's print dates I hop on it.
Having almanac type books from many different times is interesting all the same. I've just liked to hit up some antique shops specifically for books if I travel to places for whatever reason. Then bars haha.
I don't disagree, I think it's simply important to not mince words or meaning in such a crazy time. As long as you weight books pre these dates then you're good on the "truth factor" of the material. Sadly material loses its truthiness very rapidly after these time markers. Partially this is due to moving away from prime sources while it is also simply a fact that the media was conglomerated under communists and communist precursors starting in the 1880s, kicked into 3rd gear during the 1910s and then overdrive post 1930.
We should try to get a sharing "book club" together.
Haha I got two different responses to my inbox yet same-ish content. Edit or double post?
"We should try to get a sharing book club together" Totally, having a book dom-win (or whatever they will call them) with a SPECIFIC anti-leftist bias will be great.
The types who just make reading/books/etc their whole lives tend to be liberal and shit up communities because they have nothing better to do and just want to act better/more knowledgeable than everyone.
Crazy, server hung for over a minute when I posted and I had to post again..... at least I thought.
Yes, you are 100% right. There is an allure to humanism-intellectualism to a certain type that prefer luciferian based doctrine founded on the principles of old Babylon that is very much still alive.
Double posting happened again, or at least double post in the notifications haha
Word, I've only started touching philosophical stuff within the past couple years so can't say on the doctrines/principals. I'm going through Prometheus Rising right now (reading online, didn't buy a book) which seems pretty leftist and has mentioned luciferian/babylon. Somewhat interesting all the same.
Crazy, server hung for over a minute when I posted and I had to post again..... at least I thought.
Yes, you are 100% right. There is an allure to humanism-intellectualism to a certain type that prefer luciferian based doctrine founded on the principles of old Babylon that is very much still alive.
I don't disagree, I think it's simply important to not mince words or meaning in such a crazy time. As long as you weight books pre these dates then you're good on the "truth factor" of the material. Sadly material loses its truthiness very rapidly after these time markers. Partially this is due to moving away from prime sources while it is also simply a fact that the media was conglomerated under communists and communist precursors starting in the 1880s, kicked into 3rd gear during the 1910s and then overdrive post 1930.
Yes, have your own collection - physical copies that can't be changed - of things like the Constitution, important papers written by the Founding Fathers, good history/civics books especially if you have kids, dictionary, encyclopedias.
Remember that the leftists have every crazy goon in the country at their beck and call. They called off most of the rioting and protesting for now, but when things don't go their way, they'll be back. They've been practicing, live fire, all summer, they burn things, throw explosives, shoot people, use lasers. They have no problem targeting women and children. Every one of us should be preparing, stock up your pantry, get yourselves in shape, have some books for your children. Most teachers are all in with brainwashing them, and even sneakily using your kids to find out what's going on in your house or what you think.
They won't just slink away, they'll double down and refuse to admit they're wrong while they send in their mobs.
*dictionaries
This guy reads...
dictionaries.
The first time I read the dictionary I thought it was a gigantic poem about everything.
Steven Wright
Ya got me, took some Finals today... brain is a little retarded at the moment.
kids today, LOL. where's your Adderall solider?
Possessive vs plural haha
Or is that the apostrophe after the last letter in the word that basically no one uses anymore
sorry, living in NYC I get triggered by the use of apostrophes for plural in every sign on every bodega ever. it's downright anti-American.
In another time people would have complained or taunted the local government.
Now, doing that is literally hitler white supremacy nyt articles.
You beat me to it on pointing out the "dictionary's" thing.
Like 1800's definition of ethnic: Pagan.
And that word derives from 'country bumpkin'.
That's it: since the foreign xtianity slave mindset was imported first to city people, 'those country folks' were uneducated - unschooled.
It's identical to purple-haired daughters today, with a social justice degree, pointing at the less extreme and better grounded.
You're talking about that stuff.
You know. The thing!
Paper!
Ewwwww!
The existence of paper is disputed by independent Fact-Checkers.
I've got my Third International from 1981 right here. It was like 10 bucks at Half Price Books.
Not far enough back. You need to go Pre-WWII. That's where the trouble really started. The end of WWII ushered in the USA (and USA based publishing houses) as a global hegemony.
I'm working on it, but the Second International (the one with "dord" ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ) is a beautiful tome with marbled endpapers and sides, and usually sells for a bit. At the least, the Third goes back to 1961, before much damage was done I would think, and it has an appendix for the "new" words.
A decentralized dictionary would be really cool.
Put a dictionary PDF on IPFS. Old dictionaries are public domain.
Buy old books, scan them, and back up the files. Preserve the books in airtight containers.
Doesn't scanning an entire old book beat the crap out of it?
No more than reading it.
So true.
Important to get as close to primary source as possible. Jewish encyclopaediae are amazing in this regard. You will find books that you had no idea exist if you read these. The rabbit hole is has no end in sight here.
Such as?
I don't want to spoil the pot here so to speak. Do a little digging and you'll see pretty readily or contact me privately.
Gather up anything pre-WW2 and ESPECIALLY get anything pre-WW1 that you can find. ANYTHING. Even reference books of all sorts.
The first edition of Encyclopaedia Judaica is extremely valuable and offers tremendous reference value to books that you should try to find for primary source material. There are other such enclopaediae as well that are really amazing that you can dig up if you begin looking into which books and such references were used to craft that. It is arguable that Jewish vaults have the most important information left that is being rapidly hidden.
Good luck. I may have just stolen your sanity, but at least you'll be spending it on something worthwhile! ;)
Let me know if you start to build a stash... We might be able to swap books. I've thought about some form of a "book club" for like/truth minded folk.
Did you know SO many people use the word "literally" incorrectly that they decided to just add a secondary definition to account for that?
adverb:
informal:
Yes, it’s a pet peeve.
💯 pedes spitting the truth today.
Analog backups of everything.
Nothing on "the cloud" is as real as what's local. Print your pictures, too, that you want to keep. The ones of your kids. Of your parents. They won't last in your phone.
Feel free to update the word “deplorable” though...
/Shameless self promotion
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/
Wamart has a paperback...not quite so pricey. BUT, if you want an Heirloom, really recommend you buy the Hardback.
?
I doubt Walmart has what he is looking for.
Antiquing for old books is where it's at.
Print date 1950's and prior. In addition to some old 'almanac' type books with common wisdom, I have a couple late 1800's books about trade and international commerce at the time which were great reads.
You can keep an external HD too.
Record videos at 2x+ speed, compress.
Add the files for any useful programs you may want.
Maps. Constitution. Bible. Encyclopedias. Other books. Pictures.
We could probably put together a pretty extensive, yet solid ~500gb/1TB limit of an internet/survival/useful skills archive.
Probably all for not, but ya never know.
I already have a Gig worth of survival guides, along with other useful textbooks, on an old phone, and on a new phone, in the kit. Also in there is a battery kit and a solar powered charger.
Spez: NM I'll compile my own.
"Dad, why don't birds build their nest on the ground like rodents do?"
"Because it's far more safe and a much better view from the Tree, Son."
If you can afford it, also be sure to buy Encyclopaedia Judaica (FIRST EDITION) and any other such similar books like this pre World War II and I if possible. I promise you, if you study these your mind will MELT and so many preconceptions will fall away!
If you can get books that are not already digitally available please scan them and share them carefully. The education level is beyond anything offered today.
Encyclopedia. I call it “pre- electronica”
Speaking of which, is anyone interested in me posting a picture of an approximate World War I-era dictionary defining the word "gender"? I promise it's quite enlightening.
What is the definition? Or is there one?
It refers to masculine/feminine language only, is explicitly not referring to sex.
Analogue is king! Digital is a programmer’s interpretation of reality. Could be accurate... could be make believe, or whatever said programmer/operator wants it to be - just like a Dominion vote. Thick dictionaries are dope!
You're not joking. I'm sure you've seen what they did to the definition of "racism" this year.
At estate sales I buy old dictionaries, medical books, school text books, science books, history books, anything academic before 1960
literally literally means literally
Use American Heritage Dictionary. They have a free app
Important to get as close to primary source as possible. Jewish encyclopaediae are amazing in this regard. You will find books that you had no idea exist if you read these. The rabbit hole is has no end in sight here.
No kidding. I have a bunch of old books. Those bastards will change anything. It's like they all have the same job as Winston Smith.
Great post. Words have meaning, people don’t forget.
That is a sad but true commentary. SMDH
Yeah, in the old days they could burn down the monastery or library and make up a new history. Then for a good while we could print so many freaking copies that was nearly impossible, as they were held physically. Once everything is online, Ooops! Cyber attack! Russia! Great Reset 2.0! We'll have to write history over! New history! (and your money is gone.)
This is too true and one of the reasons you should ALWAYS include Jewish encyclopaediae in your collection. There is so much information and references to books that you couldn't even imagine exist. This kind of primary source REFERENCES so that you can dig deeper is INVALUABLE in this time.
I think about this all the time
Ahead of you by years. Your advice is solid.
I've got three huge old dictionaries. Also have an old medical dictionary.
What mean? Why use many word when few word do well? Am use lngsoc. Much plus plus good than other speak rules.
So true, I did this a while ago. It’s much easier to keep your sanity when you can reference hard copy.
Mine was printed in 1929.
I have two giant split dictionaries with huge spring bindings just so I have an older proof of words meaning things.
I've been saying for years that Merriam-Webster is politically active and that they change definitions based on fake google algorithms to support Leftist agendas.
Gender was synonymous with Sex in late 90's dictionaries.
By changing words it provide validity to arguments by the left while it erodes our ability to formulate debate material. But which corporations gain from this is my question.
1812 Websters Dictionary sitting on my shelf actually. Reprint 1979.
Got a massive 1929 dictionary. Almost a foot thick.
I was actually thinking this recently..like words like racism have been moved so far
Owning things is a good choice. Who would have thought.
My sister has been collecting old dictionaries.
So fucking true
If you can find them. Sometimes I'll use this. http://webstersdictionary1828.com/