I would generally agree, though the constitution usually just creates a floor that you can't cross. There's no reason that a state can't make a legal standard that is "stronger" than the constitution as long as the constitution doesn't explicitly forbid it.
I would generally agree, though the constitution usually just creates a floor that you can't cross. There's no reason that a state can't make a legal standard that is "stronger" than the constitution as long as the constitution doesn't explicitly forbid it.
I agree, the basis for most of the legal challenges are stupid state laws vs US constitutional requirements for election procedure.