He's law enforcement. If he has evidence a crime was committed, then he should arrest her for it. Leave it up to the DA if they want to prosecute or not. Just do her like they did Roger Stone. It's all about the optics. Right now, all this lawsuit does is allow him to grandstand with minimal fallout.
Agreed. However, if we continue that mindset of too big to arrest we'll never get to equal treatment under the law. Remember the Dems call for arrest regardless of evidence. This Sheriff claims he has evidence.... So he should arrest.
I could file a lawsuit saying that Gretchen Whitmer is actually Hitler reincarnated and she needs to be removed from office. My lawsuit would be dismissed but my statement would still be out there. It would have exactly the same amount of weight that his statements have right now. Zilch.
He's currently investigating voter fraud cases in his county. The lawsuit says that what Whitmer is doing is going to put his investigation in jeopardy.
If you read what was actually IN the lawsuit rather than just a news article about how it is being dismissed, you'll find his statements are not actually contingent on whether the lawsuit is dismissed or not, but they're more about what he's CURRENTLY DOING and how Whitmer is obstructing him.
Additionally, he cites ANOTHER lawsuit that corroborates what his witnesses were telling him in affidavits.
You're missing the point. Your link talks about his lawsuit as if it's still pending, it's not. Regardless of the merit of his claims, his lawsuit has been dismissed so unless and until he files an appeal, this is outdated news.
I have, but you missed the point just like OP did. The link talks about his lawsuit as if it's still pending, it's not. Regardless of the merit of his claims, his lawsuit has been dismissed so unless and until he files an appeal, this is outdated news.
No I didn't miss the point. This is to be expected based on what we have seen. You're being pretty pedantic about the semantics, as if that's what we care about here.
The quote from Sheriff Leaf, which is what this post focuses on, is relevant regardless of the technical status of the case.
It would explain why she lied about there being a Dominion agreement.
I'll give her this, of all the libtards, she's been the least retarded, letting her SoS take all the heat while she stays hidden. Too bad for her we already know!
This Benford's Law thing is amazing - I don't think that I had even heard of it prior to this election. I encourage the technically oriented users to look at a description. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford's_law
Benfords Law can't be applied here because of the size of the different county.
Check Matt Parker's video on the subject. Very well done and explained.
And non-partisan, great mathematician BTW.
Yes it's well explained why it works that way, now we can argue that biden shouldnt have that majority in those county, but the explanation makes alot of mathematical sense.
Basically if most of the county are small 500-800 registered voter and that Biden gets 50-65 in that region. He cannot have a benford law curves since he will mostly get 300-400-500-600 votes each time.
While the other candidate, if in that same region are not favorite, they have more chance to have something smilar to the Benford curve. It's worth it to watch the link cause we don't want to attack the wrong things, i still beleive its not possible Biden won without cheating.
His video was complete trash. He looked at one or two curves. So lazy.
If you want to be taken seriously he should have pulled at least 12 graphs.
That guy is a fraud like Bill Nye trying to dumb down an explanation to dismiss it. No critical thought was applied. His goal was to debunk from the beginning, not to investigate.
Well he checked exactly what was claimed in the Benfords law video. Best way to verify if it makes sense. Pick a county that is favorable to trump with most county having around 400-600 votes and check the result.
That mathematical evidence convinced me so i didnt went to check. I am just saying we need to focus on real anomalies, not those who can be mathematically explained.
Wow, oh boy, you are a bit intense, but that sting me a bit so i went and did Ohio, i think it's a good one for Trump. I didn't go down to precincts i think they are called, but only at the county level.
And look at that... oh damn i can't insert the image, but Biden got a bump at 3 and 4 again. Hmmm interesting.
Now i am curious, i think i'll do them all this weekend. At both level, County and precinct.
I would be curious to see if there is a similar state with that many county of roughly the same size 400-600 voters and pro-trump. If true we should see Trump having the bell shape curve. I am not american myself so i wouldnt know which one to pick but if data is available i dont mind doing the maths behind it on spare time.
I come on here cause i am just as pissed as you guys on this obvious stolen election, if you guys fall to them, we are next. Canada. That same BS is going on over here and we need a strong neighbor.
He's the Sheriff. He should've just arrested and charged her.
Like what in the actually fuck?
Someone should call him and ask why he didn’t?
Stretchin' Gretchen makes a comeback in prison.
He needs a judge to sign off or evidence enough for the DA.
He's law enforcement. If he has evidence a crime was committed, then he should arrest her for it. Leave it up to the DA if they want to prosecute or not. Just do her like they did Roger Stone. It's all about the optics. Right now, all this lawsuit does is allow him to grandstand with minimal fallout.
Arresting an elected official is a minefield.
Agreed. However, if we continue that mindset of too big to arrest we'll never get to equal treatment under the law. Remember the Dems call for arrest regardless of evidence. This Sheriff claims he has evidence.... So he should arrest.
DA, SOS, and AG are all in on it as well.
He's waiting for the next election to determine which way the dick swings
She is a witch
And what do we do to witches?
Hang them!
No no no we burn them. Everyone knows rope can't hurt witches. Thank you Salem for paving the way! She'll be the most fun!
I thought you held them underwater and if they didn't drown they were witches.
BURN 'EM!!!! BURN 'EM!!!!!
See if they weigh the same as a duck?
Really?
snake-haired gargoyle, with green blood.
Already dismissed:
https://www.woodtv.com/news/barry-county/judge-shuts-down-barry-co-sheriffs-attack-on-presidential-election/
The claims don't go away just because the case is dismissed.
Right and nobody makes these claims falsely without facing the fear of libel. He has some shit to back up what he is saying and it needs to be heard.
Ok, but this suit was dismissed so until he files an appeal (if he does so), the current state of this is: dismissed
But what does that have to do with anything? It's still his statements regardless of the status of the lawsuits.
His statements don't just magically disappear because the lawsuit was dismissed.
I could file a lawsuit saying that Gretchen Whitmer is actually Hitler reincarnated and she needs to be removed from office. My lawsuit would be dismissed but my statement would still be out there. It would have exactly the same amount of weight that his statements have right now. Zilch.
He's currently investigating voter fraud cases in his county. The lawsuit says that what Whitmer is doing is going to put his investigation in jeopardy.
If you read what was actually IN the lawsuit rather than just a news article about how it is being dismissed, you'll find his statements are not actually contingent on whether the lawsuit is dismissed or not, but they're more about what he's CURRENTLY DOING and how Whitmer is obstructing him.
Additionally, he cites ANOTHER lawsuit that corroborates what his witnesses were telling him in affidavits.
You're missing the point. Your link talks about his lawsuit as if it's still pending, it's not. Regardless of the merit of his claims, his lawsuit has been dismissed so unless and until he files an appeal, this is outdated news.
Have you not been paying attention? Lower courts have all been dismissing before even hearing the evidence.
I have, but you missed the point just like OP did. The link talks about his lawsuit as if it's still pending, it's not. Regardless of the merit of his claims, his lawsuit has been dismissed so unless and until he files an appeal, this is outdated news.
No I didn't miss the point. This is to be expected based on what we have seen. You're being pretty pedantic about the semantics, as if that's what we care about here.
The quote from Sheriff Leaf, which is what this post focuses on, is relevant regardless of the technical status of the case.
I haven’t read article, but round here, police seize evidence.
Is obstruction of justice in play here?
It would explain why she lied about there being a Dominion agreement.
I'll give her this, of all the libtards, she's been the least retarded, letting her SoS take all the heat while she stays hidden. Too bad for her we already know!
This Benford's Law thing is amazing - I don't think that I had even heard of it prior to this election. I encourage the technically oriented users to look at a description. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford's_law
Please let her get fucked in the ass over this. Oh wait...
STREEEETCHIN GRETCHEN
Idk if her asshole is big enough for 80M pissed off patriots...yet.
Bitch needs to go to the chopping block, literally. then into a wood chipper so she can actually be useful.
"There's a snake in my boots!"
The fact that these states have rules, that everything gets erased after 7 days, unless there’s an audit. Which they deny every time. Is insane.
Welp, stupid Whichmer doesn't realize, deleting evidence is still considered evidence. Am I right? or do I also sound stupid?
Not in the commie court of law. Deleting evidence means there is no evidence
This woman is terrible! Check out the GRETCH WHO STOLE CHRISTMAS ebook https://www.annasartavenue.com/book-s
Benfords Law can't be applied here because of the size of the different county. Check Matt Parker's video on the subject. Very well done and explained. And non-partisan, great mathematician BTW.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etx0k1nLn78
That's incredible because all the other candidates' votes followed benfords law. What a weird coincidence right.
Yes it's well explained why it works that way, now we can argue that biden shouldnt have that majority in those county, but the explanation makes alot of mathematical sense.
Basically if most of the county are small 500-800 registered voter and that Biden gets 50-65 in that region. He cannot have a benford law curves since he will mostly get 300-400-500-600 votes each time.
While the other candidate, if in that same region are not favorite, they have more chance to have something smilar to the Benford curve. It's worth it to watch the link cause we don't want to attack the wrong things, i still beleive its not possible Biden won without cheating.
His video was complete trash. He looked at one or two curves. So lazy.
If you want to be taken seriously he should have pulled at least 12 graphs.
That guy is a fraud like Bill Nye trying to dumb down an explanation to dismiss it. No critical thought was applied. His goal was to debunk from the beginning, not to investigate.
Well he checked exactly what was claimed in the Benfords law video. Best way to verify if it makes sense. Pick a county that is favorable to trump with most county having around 400-600 votes and check the result.
That mathematical evidence convinced me so i didnt went to check. I am just saying we need to focus on real anomalies, not those who can be mathematically explained.
Your a moron. There is no ‘Benfords law video’ there is countless github repos, papers written, and many videos regarding the subject.
That lack of interest in not wanting to check for yourself will get you reported.
Wow, oh boy, you are a bit intense, but that sting me a bit so i went and did Ohio, i think it's a good one for Trump. I didn't go down to precincts i think they are called, but only at the county level.
And look at that... oh damn i can't insert the image, but Biden got a bump at 3 and 4 again. Hmmm interesting.
Now i am curious, i think i'll do them all this weekend. At both level, County and precinct.
Let me know how it goes. I’ve been working on this shit for weeks, and I’ve seen lots of garbage thrown around. Bedford’s law isn’t a joke to dismiss.
So where Trump had the majority he didn't follow benfords law? :/ mathematician != logician
I would be curious to see if there is a similar state with that many county of roughly the same size 400-600 voters and pro-trump. If true we should see Trump having the bell shape curve. I am not american myself so i wouldnt know which one to pick but if data is available i dont mind doing the maths behind it on spare time.
I come on here cause i am just as pissed as you guys on this obvious stolen election, if you guys fall to them, we are next. Canada. That same BS is going on over here and we need a strong neighbor.
I feel bad for that guy. He probably got blasted for calling out Dr. Shiva. Lol
Deboonked?