1795
Comments (66)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
kyle 2 points ago +2 / -0

His video was complete trash. He looked at one or two curves. So lazy.

If you want to be taken seriously he should have pulled at least 12 graphs.

That guy is a fraud like Bill Nye trying to dumb down an explanation to dismiss it. No critical thought was applied. His goal was to debunk from the beginning, not to investigate.

1
Einskaldir 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well he checked exactly what was claimed in the Benfords law video. Best way to verify if it makes sense. Pick a county that is favorable to trump with most county having around 400-600 votes and check the result.

That mathematical evidence convinced me so i didnt went to check. I am just saying we need to focus on real anomalies, not those who can be mathematically explained.

2
kyle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your a moron. There is no ‘Benfords law video’ there is countless github repos, papers written, and many videos regarding the subject.

That lack of interest in not wanting to check for yourself will get you reported.

2
Einskaldir 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, oh boy, you are a bit intense, but that sting me a bit so i went and did Ohio, i think it's a good one for Trump. I didn't go down to precincts i think they are called, but only at the county level.

And look at that... oh damn i can't insert the image, but Biden got a bump at 3 and 4 again. Hmmm interesting.

Now i am curious, i think i'll do them all this weekend. At both level, County and precinct.

2
kyle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let me know how it goes. I’ve been working on this shit for weeks, and I’ve seen lots of garbage thrown around. Bedford’s law isn’t a joke to dismiss.