1795
Comments (66)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
kyle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let me know how it goes. I’ve been working on this shit for weeks, and I’ve seen lots of garbage thrown around. Bedford’s law isn’t a joke to dismiss.

1
Einskaldir 1 point ago +1 / -0

So i couldnt do it in the last days but worked on it today a little.

Havent got all states compiled yet but wanted to see the swing states ( my list may be the wrong one, but i think its close to the swing state list, not a specialist of USA election )

List: Arizona, Ohio, Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin. Check the results... Trump almost perfect on the curve, Biden not at all. Benn starting a conversation on that original video, people brings interesting points but, it smells fishy as hell.

(L= 30,1% -- 17,6% -- 12,5% -- 9,7% -- 7,9% -- 6,7% -- 5,8% -- 5,1% -- 4,6%)

(T= 30,9% -- 18,4% -- 10,0% -- 8,6% -- 8,4% -- 6,4% -- 6,5% -- 5,3% -- 5,6%)

(B= 25,5% -- 18,9% -- 12,7% -- 14,5% -- 6,2% -- 7,3% -- 5,6% -- 4,4% -- 4,9%)

Altough it becomes clearer with times that he won by cranking illegal votes in some key big county with huge cities, so i guess the key to fraud isnt here anyway. Still...

1
Einskaldir 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes i realize what he did, he went to the precincts level which are smaller, Benford's law needing several order of magnitude to work effectively, seems like the county level will give the best results. Since they have votes in the 10s of thousands instead of small 500-800 voter precincts.

Can't wait to run them all and then do some matching, swing states vs non swing states, etc.

Big cities only, vs smaller county with no significant cities. i'll figure a way to have the result linked.