Q may or may not be a larp... but man some things are starting to make sense !!!
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (54)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Q isn’t a larp. They don’t have a time machine and can’t predict the future. They are an insider and are educated about the us government, history both old and new. But not perfect. It’s called educated guesswork. It’s like a fireside cyber-chat with the Daniel Boone of US geopolitical strategy. Like listening to a sage and trying to decider the message in the myriad of details. Pretty basic no big deal. Probably Flynn
He and his family took the Q oath on Independence Day. He also just talked about digital soldiers (us) I think yesterday. Lin Wood has #WWG1WGA in his Twitter bio. Trump retweets a lot of Q followers. Q could maybe be a team of people but I do think Flynn is involved.
Q team is probably General Flynn, General McInerney, Ezra Cohen-Watnick aka @EWillHelpYou on Parler, Watson family (Ron and Jim), Juan O'Savin, Dennis L. Montgomery, and various other gentlemen connected to the Union League of Philadelphia.
Scavino is helping for sure
Admiral Mike Rogers, too.
Deport
I would like straight talk.
If one time Q said "this person in this department did this thing and this proves it" then aaaaaalllllll the smoke and mirrors would be bearable.
They can't be that straight-forward, because it would violate national security laws. (They would lose their security clearances for disclosing classified intel.)
That is why they are cryptic. Everything has to be done by the book and above board, otherwise it will be considered illegal and cause future fallout.
Q points to info that is already open sourse. (You have more than you know. Dig!) Which is what TD is famous for.
Straight talk may give up who they are?
Anybody's guesswork would be pretty educated who had access to all electronic communication ever, which is what Q claims to have.
Weird. I missed the q post that said that. Which one was that?
Anytime he says "we have it all" or "we have everything," that's what he's talking about.
Thank you for saying that because it proves my point. That’s your interpretation of what he said. I think this is the main problem. What Q posted and how it is interpreted are not the same. We have it all and we have everything(what he said) “that’s what he’s talking about”=your interpretation.