714
Comments (54)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
Lunatic_Fringe_PhD 6 points ago +6 / -0

I would like straight talk.

If one time Q said "this person in this department did this thing and this proves it" then aaaaaalllllll the smoke and mirrors would be bearable.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 2 points ago +2 / -0

They can't be that straight-forward, because it would violate national security laws. (They would lose their security clearances for disclosing classified intel.)

That is why they are cryptic. Everything has to be done by the book and above board, otherwise it will be considered illegal and cause future fallout.

1
Chickapede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q points to info that is already open sourse. (You have more than you know. Dig!) Which is what TD is famous for.

2
WakeUpWorld 2 points ago +2 / -0

Straight talk may give up who they are?