They can't be that straight-forward, because it would violate national security laws. (They would lose their security clearances for disclosing classified intel.)
That is why they are cryptic. Everything has to be done by the book and above board, otherwise it will be considered illegal and cause future fallout.
I would like straight talk.
If one time Q said "this person in this department did this thing and this proves it" then aaaaaalllllll the smoke and mirrors would be bearable.
They can't be that straight-forward, because it would violate national security laws. (They would lose their security clearances for disclosing classified intel.)
That is why they are cryptic. Everything has to be done by the book and above board, otherwise it will be considered illegal and cause future fallout.
Q points to info that is already open sourse. (You have more than you know. Dig!) Which is what TD is famous for.
Straight talk may give up who they are?