3616
Comments (68)
sorted by:
87
acasper 87 points ago +87 / -0

They can't really turn down a case like this if there are any grounds whatsoever as they are the court that handles disputes between states.

48
deleted 48 points ago +49 / -1
34
_shifty 34 points ago +34 / -0

no hoping about it. state vs state disputes is the original intended purpose of the supreme court. it was never supposed to be the arbiter of case law for just any case that was not ruled in a satisfactory way in lower courts.

17
errydaktal 17 points ago +17 / -0

But there was also fraud in texas. Biden didn't get 1.4m more votes than hillary

3
vegaspatriot1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

DEBOOONKED!

10
Rainman 10 points ago +10 / -0

The fact is if the SCOTUS doesn't fix this fraud by making a clear statement that states must follow the constitution and state's laws when it comes to federal elections the fraud will never be resolved.

At that point POTUS must enact the innserrection act and hold new elections in contested precincts with military supervision or the country is genuinely lost

-7
540k-Again -7 points ago +1 / -8

Wait for the full lawsuit text first! The article shows it's snek, here's my breakdown:

https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTmdUij/breakdown-of-breitbart-article-o/

20
TypicalEd 20 points ago +20 / -0

I believe it only takes 4 justices for it to be accepted.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
7
BloodDe 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm going to go out on a long limb here and guess 5 to 4.

I realize that's a long shot.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
9
jdur 9 points ago +9 / -0

I just wonder if the authority of filing as the state of texas will be challenged. The gov has cucked to facemasks so I doubt he would be behind this

7
acasper 7 points ago +7 / -0

I do definitely wonder who is bringing the case which is why I want the full text instead of reporters sharing their 50/50 roach brain analysis.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
milhouseisameme 3 points ago +3 / -0

How long before they respond do you know

1
Sugar4Brains 1 point ago +1 / -0

probably today along with the PA case

42
paradox87 42 points ago +42 / -0

According to Jay Sekulow the supreme court has to take this case under grounds of "Original Jurisdiction." Basically a bad election in one state dilutes the election for every state

10
vegaspatriot1776 10 points ago +10 / -0

an injustice against one is an injustice against all. RIP commies!

2
GreekYogurtGod 2 points ago +2 / -0

And then what? A new election?

2
CommieCucker 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would guess the most likely result would be that it gets kicked to a Congressional vote

1
Redpill-notCommieRed 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Republican state legislators take charge and send their electorals to Trump.

0
MAGAA2020isback 0 points ago +1 / -1

I like Sekulow.

Only thing is, I think the Supreme Court will probably agree to hear just one election-related case. So, let's hope they pick up the best one and let's hope we grab it. Alito has already shown some receptivity to the merits when he asked PA to separate their mail in ballots, but this isn't quite the same thing as a majority victory. We'll see. It's tough when the fraud is so damn strong but hyper political lower courts are throwing them out and higher courts are rejecting jurisdiction.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
35
China-is-asshoe 35 points ago +35 / -0

Iโ€™m praying pede. And I am not religious but lately I feel the need to pray

30
dontbanus 30 points ago +32 / -2

Thatโ€™s because this is the great awakening. I myself have found God and prayer during these times. I overheard someone at the store say they were a โ€œborn again Christianโ€ and only recently born again.

When they say this is biblical they are not exaggerating.

It is good vs evil.

I def recommend reading some of the stories from the Bible itself. I was always afraid to open it up until recently and wow, absolutely game changer.

God bless you, pede.

9
GreenCumulon 9 points ago +10 / -1

I'm in the same boat. If you havnt listened to Jordan Peterson Bible lectures you should. The Bible is much deeper than I was tough when I was a kid.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
6
dixie1963 6 points ago +6 / -0

Your post gave me chills! God is moving in these times.

5
ciemPepe 5 points ago +5 / -0

God bless you, welcome to the family of God

Jesus saves.

4
ShyRipley 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lift all voices and He will hear

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
5
dukeofdoorcounty 5 points ago +5 / -0

You'll hear about it after the ruling , giving it the most "Trump stole the election " effect as possible.

1
GreekYogurtGod 1 point ago +1 / -0

TrUmPs sTaGiNg a CoUPe

2
Daemoness 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, including my Missouri . The silence makes me fear the worst.

9
Tookens 9 points ago +9 / -0

They have to take the case. Because otherwise why do we even have them?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
1
Mrsattorney 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yup. At the Medal of Freedom ceremony for Dan Gable yesterday.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
SmolPedeBestPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Note not clear if they can, but they have many times in the past. As one example, in 2016 Nebraska and Oklahoma brought a lawsuit against Colorado to SCOTUS concerning marijuana legalization. The court decided 6-2 not to hear it, without explanation. Alito and Thomas dissented, saying the court should have taken the case.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
nenorpg 4 points ago +4 / -0

I asked in my own thread, but why aren't other states doing the same as Texas?

3
Sugar4Brains 3 points ago +3 / -0

PA will use tbe Chewbacca defense

3
RocknnRobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

...a Wookiee living on Endor...therefor Biden wins?

1
EDDIT_IS_CUCKED 1 point ago +2 / -1

That doesn't make any sense!

2
0xTC 2 points ago +2 / -0

Texas knows firsthand how the election was rigged. Democrats were SURE Texas was going to turn Blue...but a key ingredient went missing: the fake Chinese ballots needed. Go back and look what happened this year to Chinese burning ballots at the embassy. You canโ€™t have a โ€œblue shiftโ€ if you ONLY have dominion and do not have the subsequent ballot stuffing. Iโ€™m willing to bet Texas is about to show some shit, and Democrats are absolutely FUCKED.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
MAGAMAN300 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course they will accept this case... President Trump has the Conservative majority. Except for Roberts... The rest of the Judges will accept it, They are that BASED. ACB and every single Trump appointee know what's going on.. Plus Scotus handles disputes between States so they will take it. BUT DON'T STOP PRAYING! praying is a good thing.

Like President Trump said yesterday "You will see some BIG THINGS HAPPENING OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS!". This was all planned in my opinion!! PEDES WE ARE NOT ALONE IN THIS FIGHT TO SAVE OUR REPUBLIC AND WILL BE SAVED ONE WAY OR ANOTHER . PRESIDENT TRUMP WILL START HIS SECOND TERM IN JAN 2021 ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!

1
Drsugarballs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now get Florida, Ohio and the rest to follow along.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Choppa_Pilot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Today is a good day: it's the Feast of Our Lady of the Immaculate Conception. The Blessed Mother of our Lord, under that title, is the patron Saint of the United States of America.

๐Ÿ™ Beatissima Virgo Maria, Mater Dei, ora pro nobis!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Drpol 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can someone please explain the significance of this? Donโ€™t we have several cases going to Supreme Court also? Why are people acting like this is the last hope?

1
Weallseethetruth 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is setting up to be a "if you don't accept this case then Texas will secede from the US" type of letter!!!

1
Sugar4Brains 1 point ago +1 / -0

No Standing! No Injury! and Laches if you do!

REEEEeeeEeeeEeeeeeee

1
slaphappy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no way in hell that they don't take the case. It only takes four justices to take the case - and we have five. The conservative block has already written that PA's actions were probably unconsitutional.

0
EvensoAmen 0 points ago +1 / -1

We don't have 5. Roberts may or may not vote with our 4 but he is not conservative.

1
slaphappy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Learn how to count.

0
EvensoAmen 0 points ago +1 / -1

1....2....3....4....?

1
slaphappy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Try again. This time go higher. I know you can do it.

1
EvensoAmen 1 point ago +1 / -0

:) Maybe Alito will tell Roberts to vote accordingly or he will release the Epstein Kraken. If this happens then we definitely have 5!

1
GreatHumungous 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the USSC caves then weโ€™re at civil war time, lay down the Insurrection Act and 2018 EO on foreign election involvement which has tons of proof they did and let the chips fall where they may I LOVE our odds!

1
orange_kek_great 1 point ago +1 / -0

They better fucking do the right thing. If not, millions of Americans are at a breaking point. Domestic enemies will be first.....then... hello CCP.

1
magagaLady 1 point ago +1 / -0

pede prayin ๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™MAGA๐Ÿ™FOUR MORE YEARS๐Ÿ™ FOUR MORE YEARS ๐Ÿ™ FOUR MORE YEARS๐Ÿ™FOUR MORE YEARS๐Ÿ™FIGHT FOR TRUMP๐Ÿ™FIGHT FOR TRUMP๐Ÿ™FIGHT FOR TRUMP๐Ÿ™TEXAS๐Ÿ™TEXAS๐Ÿ™

1
RandoMando2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

I pray they sue Cali next.