The fact that you think that they'll be neutral when they've been harrassed, drug through the mud and 2 of them were in bullshit hearings that wanted to tear them apart for a life-long appointment? Seriously? CT swore in ACB with a bigger smile on his face than you realize. This is a vendetta, a righteous one.
The point is that they can have those feelings, but they have to set them aside and say what the law and the Constitution say.
Now, there's nothing that says a judge or a justice can't be sarcastic or kindly in the way they write their opinions, or that they can't smack around attorneys in their oral questioning. But they have to have good legal reasons.
Usually liberals provide lots of good legal reasons, especially if you can dig into one of their heaps of BS and disintegrate it.
I don't see how the mountain of evidence, and the steady flowing in evidence can make someone who has actual law-sense to pass it up. These aren't lower court judges.
The fact that you think that they'll be neutral when they've been harrassed, drug through the mud and 2 of them were in bullshit hearings that wanted to tear them apart for a life-long appointment? Seriously? CT swore in ACB with a bigger smile on his face than you realize. This is a vendetta, a righteous one.
The point is that they can have those feelings, but they have to set them aside and say what the law and the Constitution say.
Now, there's nothing that says a judge or a justice can't be sarcastic or kindly in the way they write their opinions, or that they can't smack around attorneys in their oral questioning. But they have to have good legal reasons.
Usually liberals provide lots of good legal reasons, especially if you can dig into one of their heaps of BS and disintegrate it.
I don't see how the mountain of evidence, and the steady flowing in evidence can make someone who has actual law-sense to pass it up. These aren't lower court judges.