No. I'm just bringing something up subtly. We don't want censorship but there are adverse forces we need to be aware of. This is among them.
There are groups, we don't really know what they're about or truly intend that are either way creating strife that's unnecessary.
I don't know the JIDF. I do know some forces around that can be a bit too zealous given the tremendous threat they face and the determination to win.
I do however know the ADL and CAAS. For whatever reason these groups backfire (CAAS is a nationalist militant group that likes to quote military songs usually repeating things three times like fight fight fight or education education education no wait that's Tony Blair, my favourite is candyman though, beats out beatlejuice, except that episode of TNG, Cause and Effect, never say Holocaust three times in a row). Personally I'm not going to be coy about it though. It's not doing anyone any good.
These organisations are the most divisive and censorious.
The problem is, your replies to me make no sense in the context of my text. I didn't promote a stance on any issue other than the fight against those who use and promote disruptive tactics that conflict with the future of TDW.
copied from an earlier post I made about this subject:
One of the rules bans "general unfounded bigotry". I believe the key word there is unfounded. If posted content is true, there is no reason for it to be banned, even if it offends someone or some group. That kind of censorship is unacceptable. Of course things posted on TDW should be relevant to the concepts of MAGA, KAG, etc. Pointing out problems in our society that are continually suppressed is just a part of that process. People have cowered behind political correctness for far too long. It wouldn't be right to suppress people from discussing these subjects as long as they do so within the bounds of the established rules.
The curse of being drunk and also being focused on another battle at hand rather than the battle at hand.
These people operate on the boundary. Yu needs to find a pivot to tip the balance. Sometimes it is good, it is our boundary and we escape our imprisonment but sometimes they're just cattle rustlers and trying to have us come into their pasture so to graze and never to escape.
As long as we're civil, friction will happen and things will heat up a little but we can handle it which is what makes us better. You can point out hey you posted that it's random and you didn't bother to read the whole thread and I can be like alright fair enough.
These people though don't know how to get along. They'll try to exploit natural divisions among us but they'll never crack us.
It doesn't work on us the same way it does on others. They exploit those who are vulnerable and afraid because they are black. They exploit those who are vulnerable and afraid because they are white.
They exploit those who are afraid and vulnerable. The only fear I fear is that which I might induce in others. They best be afraid if they truly induce fear in me.
We are the stubborn stain left behind that they just can't crack. Try try and try as they might until the fuel tank is empty. Come at us I say.
We do need to remember that extremists will try to find a home in any camp they can. We are under attack. We actively keep out the extremists but are also genuinely inclusive and will listen to people's say then oppose it on equal terms and win unlike the left that has to cheat and use downvotes or moderation or election fraud to win.
They will exploit that we're individualists not collectivists and try to tar us with the brush of those we're willing to entertain but not necessarily pass a favourable verdict upon.
Be careful not to sink into the image obsession and how things are seen that works so well on the psychologically weak left who have in their flexibility normally a strength have been made putty in the hands of those who seek to ill do.
Either way we are supremacists but not the sort they would like us to be. We are superior in emotion, logic, flexibility, solidarity, etc. We shall win in all battles and leave them nothing of their own just as they have tried taking it all from us, our nationality, our race, our thinking, our speech, our guns, all of it until left with nothing but the individual that is each of us which they they endeavour to take from us.
If they say we can't have guns for ourselves, hands for ourselves, eyes for ourselves, mouths for ourselves, brains for ourselves or even ourselves for ourselves then lets see what happens when we hold them to the same and demand selflessness to match their demands of ourselves.
No. I'm just bringing something up subtly. We don't want censorship but there are adverse forces we need to be aware of. This is among them.
There are groups, we don't really know what they're about or truly intend that are either way creating strife that's unnecessary.
I don't know the JIDF. I do know some forces around that can be a bit too zealous given the tremendous threat they face and the determination to win.
I do however know the ADL and CAAS. For whatever reason these groups backfire (CAAS is a nationalist militant group that likes to quote military songs usually repeating things three times like fight fight fight or education education education no wait that's Tony Blair, my favourite is candyman though, beats out beatlejuice, except that episode of TNG, Cause and Effect, never say Holocaust three times in a row). Personally I'm not going to be coy about it though. It's not doing anyone any good.
These organisations are the most divisive and censorious.
The problem is, your replies to me make no sense in the context of my text. I didn't promote a stance on any issue other than the fight against those who use and promote disruptive tactics that conflict with the future of TDW.
copied from an earlier post I made about this subject:
The curse of being drunk and also being focused on another battle at hand rather than the battle at hand.
These people operate on the boundary. Yu needs to find a pivot to tip the balance. Sometimes it is good, it is our boundary and we escape our imprisonment but sometimes they're just cattle rustlers and trying to have us come into their pasture so to graze and never to escape.
As long as we're civil, friction will happen and things will heat up a little but we can handle it which is what makes us better. You can point out hey you posted that it's random and you didn't bother to read the whole thread and I can be like alright fair enough.
These people though don't know how to get along. They'll try to exploit natural divisions among us but they'll never crack us.
It doesn't work on us the same way it does on others. They exploit those who are vulnerable and afraid because they are black. They exploit those who are vulnerable and afraid because they are white.
They exploit those who are afraid and vulnerable. The only fear I fear is that which I might induce in others. They best be afraid if they truly induce fear in me.
We are the stubborn stain left behind that they just can't crack. Try try and try as they might until the fuel tank is empty. Come at us I say.
We do need to remember that extremists will try to find a home in any camp they can. We are under attack. We actively keep out the extremists but are also genuinely inclusive and will listen to people's say then oppose it on equal terms and win unlike the left that has to cheat and use downvotes or moderation or election fraud to win.
They will exploit that we're individualists not collectivists and try to tar us with the brush of those we're willing to entertain but not necessarily pass a favourable verdict upon.
Be careful not to sink into the image obsession and how things are seen that works so well on the psychologically weak left who have in their flexibility normally a strength have been made putty in the hands of those who seek to ill do.
Either way we are supremacists but not the sort they would like us to be. We are superior in emotion, logic, flexibility, solidarity, etc. We shall win in all battles and leave them nothing of their own just as they have tried taking it all from us, our nationality, our race, our thinking, our speech, our guns, all of it until left with nothing but the individual that is each of us which they they endeavour to take from us.
If they say we can't have guns for ourselves, hands for ourselves, eyes for ourselves, mouths for ourselves, brains for ourselves or even ourselves for ourselves then lets see what happens when we hold them to the same and demand selflessness to match their demands of ourselves.